Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Iv'e beeen try ing to find one for a couple of years now ...

sorry the just don't exist :verymad:

what do you mean they dont exist.

"bbc one live stream" in google will win you something when bbc are actually there.

and or "sky sports f1 stream" tho sky i would say is a little trickier.

firefox and an add blocker would be handy for most of the results tho. and or a vpn and you can just watch it all thru the bbc's website :)

post-31456-0-61388900-1370638844_thumb.png

what do you mean they dont exist.

"bbc one live stream" in google will win you something when bbc are actually there.

and or "sky sports f1 stream" tho sky i would say is a little trickier.

firefox and an add blocker would be handy for most of the results tho. and or a vpn and you can just watch it all thru the bbc's website :)

attachicon.gifScreen Shot 2013-06-08 at 7.00.05 AM.png

sorry I was just being a dick, that question Macillaz asked seems to come up every other week and if he searched he could have found a link to watch FP1

Edited by Missileman

Christian Horner has revealed that Red Bull Racing turned down the opportunity to test with Pirelli as they felt it "wasn't in line" with the rules.

"We believe it is the responsibility of the entrant to comply with the regulations, so when it came to light that a test with the current car had taken place, or interpretation of the rules was that that was in clear breach of them, therefore we raised a protest prior to the race for it to be dealt with by the FIA," he said during Friday's FIA press conference.

"It is really an issue between the team and the FIA and obviously Pirelli have asked several teams to test - ourselves included - but we have declined to do so as we felt it wasn't in line with the regulations, certainly with the current car. So that is the situation, it has gone to the tribunal and we trust the FIA to make the appropriate decision regarding it.

"The important thing is that there needs to be absolute clarity in what you can do and what you can't do, what I testing and what isn't testing and I think that that is more crucial than anything to be fully resolved."

The Red Bull team boss also claimed that there was no way Mercedes did not get an advantage over their rivals despite the team's insistance that they did not.

"I think that whenever you have limited testing with the rules written as they are, then when you run a current car with the way the amount of technology and the way the amount of data analysis there is you are always learning - whether it is reliability, whether it be endurance, whether it be performance.

"So of course even if you are testing a component for another supplier you are learning. Formula 1 has moved an awfully long way over the last few years to ensure fairness and equality to all of the entrants and I think if a team does carry out an extra 1000km with a current car then you are going to learn something."

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/8764261/-Red-Bull-declined-Pirelli-test-

Paul Hembery will not face the media in Montreal on Friday afternoon as he has withdrawn on advice from Pirelli's legal team.

http://www.planetf1.com/driver/18227/8764099/Hembery-withdraws-from-press-conf

P1 Times

01. Paul di Resta Force India 1m21.020 10 laps
02. Jenson Button McLaren 1m21.108 +0.088 20 laps
03. Romain Grosjean Lotus 1m21.258 +0.238 21 laps
04. Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1m21.308 +0.288 16 laps
05. Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1m21.608 +0.588 22 laps
06. Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1m22.068 +1.048 18 laps
07. Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1m22.402 +1.382 22 laps
08. Sergio Perez McLaren 1m22.587 +1.567 17 laps
09. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1m23.047 +2.027 26 laps
10. Mark Webber Red Bull 1m23.131 +2.111 16 laps
11. Felipe Massa Ferrari 1m23.341 +2.321 13 laps
12. Valtteri Bottas Williams 1m23.352 +2.332 17 laps
13. Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1m23.3e6 +2.366 19 laps
14. Adrian Sutil Force India 1m23.417 +2.397 19 laps
15. Esteban Gutierrez Sauber 1m23.957 +2.937 33 laps
16. Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1m25.054 +4.034 21 laps
17. Nico Hulkenberg Sauber 1m25.354 +4.334 22 laps
18. Giedo van der Garde Caterham 1m25.753 +4.733 21 laps
19. Max Chilton Marussia 1m25.821 +4.801 19 laps
20. Charles Pic Caterham 1m27.143 +6.123 20 laps
21. Pastor Maldonado Williams 1m27.522 +6.502 11 laps
22. Jules Bianchi Marussia 1m29.306 +8.286 8 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8763404/Prac-One

P2 Times
01. Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1m14.818 48 laps
02. Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1m14.830 +0.012 45 laps
03. Romain Grosjean Lotus 1m15.083 +0.265 40 laps
04. Mark Webber Red Bull 1m15.212 +0.394 46 laps
05. Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1m15.249 +0.431 46 laps
06. Felipe Massa Ferrari 1m15.254 +0.436 43 laps
07. Sebastian Vettel Red Bull 1m15.280 +0.462 41 laps
08. Adrian Sutil Force India 1m15.396 +0.578 43 laps
09. Jenson Button McLaren 1m15.422 +0.604 29 laps
10. Daniel Ricciardo Toro Rosso 1m15.566 +0.748 38 laps
11. Kimi Raikkonen Lotus 1m15.599 +0.781 35 laps
12. Sergio Perez McLaren 1m15.661 +0.843 39 laps
13. Paul di Resta Force India 1m15.855 +1.037 22 laps
14. Pastor Maldonado Williams 1m16.319 +1.501 46 laps
15. Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso 1m16.351 +1.533 38 laps
16. Valtteri Bottas Williams 1m16.374 +1.556 40 laps
17. Esteban Gutierrez Saube 1m16.475 +1.657 45 laps
18. Nico Hulkenberg Sauber 1m16.929 +2.111 35 laps
19. Jules Bianchi Marussia 1m17.070 +2.252 41 laps
20. Charles Pic Caterham 1m17.236 +2.418 35 laps
21. Max Chilton Marussia 1m17.888 +3.070 45 laps
22. Giedo van der Garde Caterham 1m18.392 +3.574 39 laps

http://www.planetf1.com/news/3213/8764018/Prac-Two

Thailand's plans to host a Formula 1 grand prix have hit trouble after Bangkok officials banned racing in the city's historic quarter.


Authorities said in April that a 5.995km circuit would be created near the Royal Thai Naval Dockyard in Bangkok, with the hope of landing a deal to host a Formula 1 race in 2015.


The track would have run past the Grand Palace, the Temple of Dawn and Victory Monument.


The plans, however, have suffered a setback after Bangkok's Metropolitan Authority passed a law that bans racing in the area.


"The law came into effect on May 16 prohibiting car racing in inner Bangkok because that area is a conservation for culture and arts," Kriangphon Pattanarat, director general of city planning department told AFP.


It is still unknown whether another location is being considered for the circuit.


http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/107905


Massa continues to shine

And Maldonado, 2nd drivers at their best

Have to say I was really looking forward to Grosjean gaining some confidence and showing some speed, but it doesnt look like its going to happen this year.

Grid Penlaties for Kimi and Dan. Only lose 1 place each because of the order the Penalties were inforced. Bit of good luck in a bad situation for those two

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...