Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I only run 2 degrees neg camber at the front, and dont want to run more permanently as the car is mostly street. I use r spec at the track so i'd like to run more like 4 degrees on track days - would it be feasible to just swap upper control arms, or would that also effect toe? (or something else?)

For a lot of our GTR's we have several sets of upper arms from 2.5 to 5.0 in .5 deg increments.

A camber change effects the entire alignment, only mildly but it does.

Best to get a base line alignment and note the settings. Change only the Camber and then check toe and castor again. Note them down and work out the difference.

Typically a GTR will loose castor and toe out when adding camber. The toe out is okay providong its measured and desirable. but the castor loss is difficult to rectify without massive strain on the radius rods and bushes.

ahh Brad has already put together a more complete response....but my car handles terribly in the wet, so I have a lengthened pair of upper arms to swap in.

of course, it has never been wet once since I started taking the spare set :)

For a lot of our GTR's we have several sets of upper arms from 2.5 to 5.0 in .5 deg increments.

A camber change effects the entire alignment, only mildly but it does.

Best to get a base line alignment and note the settings. Change only the Camber and then check toe and castor again. Note them down and work out the difference.

Once i know the difference, what do i do with that info?

Typically a GTR will loose castor and toe out when adding camber. The toe out is okay providong its measured and desirable. but the castor loss is difficult to rectify without massive strain on the radius rods and bushes.

I'm currently zero toe front and rear. I know loosing toe will make the car less inclined to turn in, but is that just a feeling at the steering wheel or does it equate to more understeer?

The car is running factory castor (nismo radius rods with the wider bush) and superpro adjustable bushes. I assumed that the extra castor that's popular is what puts strain on the outer bushes on the upper arm and chews them out - is that right?

Given my setup, do you think i'm likely to have problems if i swap in arms to get 4 degrees neg and make no other changes?

Thanks Brad and Duncan!

well Brad is better to answer that more fully...and he is the person who has got my car handling so well

in my case I run a little toe out with the standard upper arms, and therefore little to no toe if I swap to the longer arms. but since I only use the longer arm when it is wet, loosing toe out is actually desirable anyway, because you just don't have the grip to use the extra turn in from the extra toe.

do keep in mind that shorter upper arms are not a good thing really....they affect the geometery, flog out the caster and upper arm bushes, change the camber gain in corners and result in a narrower wheelbase. yes they are the easy way to get more camber and are commercially available but not really the good way. Lengthing the lower arms, or moving the lower arm mounting point outwards is a better idea - and in my case is one of the few freedoms allowed in production cars.

It's impossible to tell you what changing your upper arms will do without trial and error. Every car will change the alignment by various amounts.

One of the cars we prep it makes .5mm tow change. Another its a 1.5mm change.

You want it to toe out for circuit duties but tow in for a comfortable predictable street driven car

Unfortunaltly your going to have to compromise one or the other to go half serious at the track and be comfortable on the road. Or get an allognment before a track day and again after

It's impossible to tell you what changing your upper arms will do without trial and error. Every car will change the alignment by various amounts.

One of the cars we prep it makes .5mm tow change. Another its a 1.5mm change.

You want it to toe out for circuit duties but tow in for a comfortable predictable street driven car

Unfortunaltly your going to have to compromise one or the other to go half serious at the track and be comfortable on the road. Or get an allognment before a track day and again after

I only run 2 degrees neg camber at the front, and dont want to run more permanently as the car is mostly street. I use r spec at the track so i'd like to run more like 4 degrees on track days - would it be feasible to just swap upper control arms, or would that also effect toe? (or something else?)

Isnt the easiest answer is to find a pair of adjustable arms that can go to 4 degrees? Because I can promise you changing suspension arms just for a track day is a major pain.

well Brad is better to answer that more fully...and he is the person who has got my car handling so well

in my case I run a little toe out with the standard upper arms, and therefore little to no toe if I swap to the longer arms. but since I only use the longer arm when it is wet, loosing toe out is actually desirable anyway, because you just don't have the grip to use the extra turn in from the extra toe.

do keep in mind that shorter upper arms are not a good thing really....they affect the geometery, flog out the caster and upper arm bushes, change the camber gain in corners and result in a narrower wheelbase. yes they are the easy way to get more camber and are commercially available but not really the good way. Lengthing the lower arms, or moving the lower arm mounting point outwards is a better idea - and in my case is one of the few freedoms allowed in production cars.

The bush flogging out problem is because of two reasons (mostly)

The compliance in the suspension is in the castor rod. If you put rose joint rods on it you lose most of the compliance. It then gets transferred to the upper bush. Which gets trashed really quickly.

The mounting points for the inside of the upper suspension arm need to be rotated - this is what you get when you buy a Nismo bracket. Also the Nismo kit gives you a longer lower arm and a shorter castor rod. Unfortunately it is $$$$$'s.

Isnt the easiest answer is to find a pair of adjustable arms that can go to 4 degrees? Because I can promise you changing suspension arms just for a track day is a major pain.

Oh - my memory was that its easy, just two bolts - the inner and outer pivots. I'll have another look.

Also - i thought you would only need to rotate the upper arm if you were winding in more castor, and there would be no or very little effect from camber change.

Oh - my memory was that its easy, just two bolts - the inner and outer pivots. I'll have another look.

Also - i thought you would only need to rotate the upper arm if you were winding in more castor, and there would be no or very little effect from camber change.

Yeah there are two bolts but the inner one is about 150mm long and fouls on assorted bits of bodywork when you try and install it. Easiest way is to loosen the bolts on the inner bracket until you can get the bolt in - on the drivers side anyway. Hard to do that on the pasenger side as the ABS gets in the way.

If you have an adjustable outer bush there are two bolts to put in which are difficult to align and get started on the threads.

Basically if you do the inner first the outer is a %^*@ to get in and if you do the outer first the inner is a (%*@ to install.

Anyway it is quite a bit of messing about and more than just an hour of work. Then you need a wheel alignment.

thanks mate

Yeah there are two bolts but the inner one is about 150mm long and fouls on assorted bits of bodywork when you try and install it. Easiest way is to loosen the bolts on the inner bracket until you can get the bolt in - on the drivers side anyway. Hard to do that on the pasenger side as the ABS gets in the way.

thanks mate, that is the kind of really simple and obvious ideas that really shit you when you've never thought of them :) I know how I'll be installing upper arms from now one, on my car they are an absolute bastard

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...