Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The thing is though, it doesn't turn 2.5" until almost at the turbo, to allow space to smooth the flow out into the pissy little turbo as you've described. The intake on the stock turbo is exactly 2.5", and if you expanded it to 3" you'd get more air hitting the turbo, but you still need some way to channel it into a 2.5" hole.

Andrew has designed this for the best flow possible, but obviously the stock turbo isn't. If you had a high flow or a turbo with a larger intake you would keep it 3".

At this point in time this is the only intake option for people outside of Melbourne and Sydney, and it can be packed up and mailed off.

  • Replies 52
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

yeh scotts one is matched to the size of the inlet, and funnelled out, so this wall isnt hit at all..

but yeh, the option is great for others outside melbourne especially..even within melbourne for those that dont want to hit cut lol

Ok some results...

Before the tune, my economy had improved by 1-2L/100, and the car felt a lot stronger, particularly in the top end.

After tune it seems to have made a good difference, and it looks sexy to boot.

Any more takers?

  • 1 month later...

Picking this up again after Christmas, hopefully there's a bit more interest post Christmas.

I've got Josh and Lukifer keen - need three more to make this happen.

I'll close this Feb 22 now, giving everyone about a month, and some time after Valentines Day for people's wallets to recover, for those tragic romantics out there.

Thanks!

  • 2 weeks later...

Picking this up again after Christmas, hopefully there's a bit more interest post Christmas.

I've got Josh and Lukifer keen - need three more to make this happen.

I'll close this Feb 22 now, giving everyone about a month, and some time after Valentines Day for people's wallets to recover, for those tragic romantics out there.

Thanks!

hey, I'm keen bit I have issues with my afm will this increase problems, I have a dump pipe and 3"" exaust only nothing else. Cheers rudi

hey, I'm keen bit I have issues with my afm will this increase problems, I have a dump pipe and 3"" exaust only nothing else. Cheers rudi

What issues are you having?

If you're sticking with the same filters then the intake pipe shouldn't make the problem worse. Sounds like a problem with the oiled filters, not the AFM.

Hi all.

Next time a GB is started outside the GB area, it will just be locked by Admin/Mods without warning. We've told you guys enough now.

We have the section there for a purpose, we need to use it.

Nothing wrong at all with starting a thread in here to advise people to take a look or anything along those lines, just need them in the right area.

Also we will let this thread run it's course given it's not far off - but in future, please just do the right thing from the start.

Thanks.

Admin

  • 2 weeks later...
Cheers mate. Weird that Andrew sells a lot of M35 stuff on ebay, and nothing on here.

So you can buy off eBay, or get in on the group buy and save $80. Thats *almost* a tank of fuel.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...