Jump to content
SAU Community

Removing Mould From Interior Trim

Missileman

By Missileman,
in Exterior & Interior Styling

 Share

Recommended Posts

noone Experienced

noone

Posted
Posted (edited)

wipe over with white vinegar then straight water on a microfibre to remove the vinegar doubt it would really matter but better safe than sorry

probably do small inconspicuous area first if in doubt an treat any leather straight away with a leather cream after dont allow it to dry out

Edited by noone
Carbon 34 Grand Master

Carbon 34

Posted
Posted (edited)

The spores will blossom again and can cause serious health issues

use a steam cleaner with a bit of WHITE vinegar

h2O and pure clove oil ( just a few drops in a big bucket !!) it kills spores to stop spreading then let sit out in the sun to bake off stink of douche and cloves haha

Remember just a few drops to be safe on seats and dont spill it in the car or it will never go away in the heat, towels blotting the seats dry the best you can

a toothbrush is helpful in seams but use care on the pressure you apply to keep the nap from showing abrasion

baking SODA not powder sprinkled on afterwards while its closed up to capture fumes in carpets etc Do not apply while wet or you will be getting crust off works on any musty smells in the house like shoes too :-) coles sells it for a couple of bucks near the cake decorating stuff

Edited by Carbon 34
Missileman Veteran

Missileman

Posted
  • Author
Posted (edited)

Cheers Troy, will try the your suggestions out next week and report back, This is one of my relos imports, he's still in Yokohama scratching his butt and instructing his monkey what to do :)

Edited by Missileman
GTR-N1 Grand Master

GTR-N1

Posted
Posted

May I also add that the above process should be done on a day of low humidity, followed by more days of the same?

May I presume that any leaks in the storage garage or car mouldings that contributed to the mould or faulty heater core have been rectified?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kapr
      RB20DE NEO smallbox clutch.

      By Kapr · Posted

      For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...