Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys as you know I have an r33 GTR and according to my tuner it's due for a fresh of oxy sensors.

Here's what I need help understanding..

I'm using r32 dumps which have an opening to suit 12mm sensors - I.e NTK OTD2F-1P and or standard.

From my understanding 33 and 32 use different type of sensors - zircona vs Titania . Would it be fine if I was to use Titania oxy sensors on my 33?

Btw I'm using a power fc

Any help appreciated,

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/417278-oxygen-sensor-dramas-r32-vs-r33-gtr/
Share on other sites

You have two options...

The one mentioned above which I prefer,but takes alot more time to tune the low load/crusing section of the map which results in better fuel consumption if done properly or...

There is "O2 sensor reg." in the ETC. menu of the pfc which allows you to choose between r32 and r33 type O2 sensors.

If I remember correctly, off(+ sign) is r32 type. The info is floating around here....somewhere

Found the info. from Paul and its the other way around.....My bad,but as I said i just turn them off :)

apexi's official answer;

There is a difference in the o2 Sensor for these vehicles. (With or without internal register)

After tuning, please check () "O2 Sensor REGISTER" for BNR32, and NOT for BCNR33.

So off (+sign) is for r33 type sensors

turn off the o2 feedback and leave it off - tune around it

+1

always got better economy with it off and a good tune, and just leaving a dead sensor in there or a bung.

The factory O2 Sensors tend to fail more often in modified examples as well so better off just getting rid of the expense.

  • 1 year later...

Threads like this one are the reason why I keep coming back to SAU.

I have a late model BNCR33 engine in my early edition BNR32.

I installed an AEM wideband and it's constantly reading rich (14+). A couple of weeks ago, I checked the spark plugs and they were very filthy with fuel. I tried my best to clean them but a friend said I should completely replace them. I'm planning on doing that but I want to find out why my GTR is running so rich.

I think I tracked the problem to my O2 sensors via a mechanic that was doing some different work on my car. I have BNR34 VSpec dumps with BCNR33 O2 sensors installed on my BNR32 Skyline. I also have a Mine's ECU that's in need of a tune or change. :-(

Do you guys think that using a stock ECU and/or changing to BNR32 O2 sensors will improve my fuel economy?

Thanks for the clarification, Hadouken. If the spark plugs are filled with fuel, wouldn't that indicate a "rich" car?

Ido,

I don't have the stock ECU any longer. Is it possible to but a used one from the auctions and still have it work on my car?

Thanks for the clarification, Hadouken. If the spark plugs are filled with fuel, wouldn't that indicate a "rich" car?

Ido,

I don't have the stock ECU any longer. Is it possible to but a used one from the auctions and still have it work on my car?

Yes you can buy a used one or a PFC... or a plug in Link or Vipec will go in the case inhabited by your Mines chipped ecu.

I think that's what he meant: "your gauge us shit."

Let me ask you guys something, is it possible to go on a 4-5 hour road trip in the current state my car is in? I have to drop off my vehicle at a friends place that's quite far

the wide band sensors can crap out too not just the gauge. hard call there....if you are worried i'd say stay off boost and you should be ok....but in the end its up to you. I'd re-check your afr's if you can...seems weird you'd be 14's and have fouling plugs...check your breathers and make sure your intake isn't all gummed up with oil vapour residue etc.

it should be pretty obvious when they don't work....the one we were using that was faulty would only read down to 11's before giving no reading.... you should be running around the low 12's to low 11's on boost....strangely your car is quite like my wife's car...bnr32 with bcnr33 motor.

Just to confirm my own thoughts? Doesn't the o2 sensor only work during lean cruise?

I thought the ecu only uses it at lean cruise (closed loop monitoring) where it looks for the rich or lean side of lambda.

that's why it flicks around 14.5-15.5-ish back and forth as it continually looks for and aims for lambda 1.

Then when you load the engine from cruise to accelerate it will give a solid afr and richen the more load increases.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • You won't need to do that if your happy to learn to tune it yourself. You 100% do not need to do that. It is not part of the learning process. It's not like driving on track and 'finding the limit by stepping over the limit'. You should not ever accidently blow up an engine and you should have setup the ECU's engine protection to save you from yourself while you are learning anyway. Plenty of us have tuned their own cars, myself included. We still come here for advice/guidance/new ideas etc.  What have you been doing so far to learn how to tune?
    • Put the ECU's MAP line in your mouth. Blow as hard as you can. You should be able to see about 10 kPa, maybe 15 kPa positive pressure. Suck on it. You should be able to generate a decent vacuum to about the same level also. Note that this is only ~2 psi either way. If the MAP is reading -5 psi all the time, ignition on, engine running or not, driving around or not, then it is severely f**ked. Also, you SHOULD NOT BE DRIVING IT WITHOUT A LOAD REFERENCE. You will break the engine. Badly.
    • Could be correct. Meter might be that far out. Compare against a known 5 ohm 1% resistor.
    • @Murray_Calavera  If I were an expert I wouldn't be in here looking for assistance.  I am extremely computer literate, have above average understanding on how things should be working and how they should tie together.  If I need to go to a professional tuner so be it, but I'd much rather learn and do things myself even if it means looking for some guidance along the way and blowing up a few engines. @GTSBoy  I was hoping it would be as simple as a large vacuum leak somewhere but I'm unable to find anything, all lines seem to be well capped or going where they need to be, and when removed there is vacuum felt on the tube.  It would be odd for the Haltech built in MAP to be faulty, the GTT tune I imported had it enabled from the start, I incorrectly assumed it was reading a signal from the stock MAP, but that doesn't exist.  After running a vacuum hose to the ECU the signal doesn't change more than 0.2 in either direction.   I'll probably upload a video of my settings tomorrow, as it stands I'm able to daily drive, but getting stuttering when giving it gas from idle, so pulling away from lights is a slow process of revving it up and feathering the clutch until its moving, then it will accelerate fine.  It sounds like I need to get to the bottom of the manifold pressure issue, but the ignition timing section is most intimidating to me and will probably let a pro do that part.  Tomorrow I'll try a different vacuum line to T off of, with any luck I selected one that was already bypassed during the DBW swap.  (edit: I went out and did it right now, the line I had chosen did appear to have no vacuum on it, it used to go to the front of the intake, I've now completely blocked that one off at the bracket that holds several vacuum lines by the firewall.  I T'd into the vacuum line that goes from that bracket to the vacuum pump at the front of the car, but no change in the MAP readings).  Using the new vacuum line that has obvious vacuum on the hose, im still only getting readings between -6.0 and -5.2.  I'm wondering why the ECU was detecting -5.3 when nothing was connected to the MAP nipple and ECU MAP selected as the source. @feartherb26  I do have +T in the works but wanted to wait until Spring to start with that swap since this is my good winter AWD vehicle.  When removing the butterfly, did it leave a bunch of holes in the manifold that you needed to plug?  I thought about removing it but assumed it would be a mess.   I notice no difference when capping the vacuum line to it or letting it do its thing.  This whole thing has convinced me to just get a forward facing manifold when the time comes though.
    • Update: tested my spark plugs that are supposed to be 5ohms with a 10% deviation and one gave me a 0 ohms reading and the rest were 3.9ohm<, so one bad and the others on their way out.
×
×
  • Create New...