Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am looking at getting an R34 GT-T 2 door coupe. It was inspected by RACQ who mentioned that the 'UV' glass near the rear passenger seats may be illegal. I am pretty certain that UV glass is meant to be that dark but has anyone had problems with defect notices etc regarding it?

In addition, does anyone know how much it would cost to replace the glass?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/41858-r34-2-door-coupe-gt-ts-rear-window/
Share on other sites

yes it is dark, but that was a factory privacy option, you'll pay through the nose to get it replaced as it's you antenna as well!

The 180's have similar glass....not much you can do about it.

I'm pretty sure that it would have been looked at with regards to ADRs as 99% of R34's have the dark glass.

Dude.. I have a R34 GTT with the UV cut glass also with tinting! :thumbsup:

I have had a full RACQ check just before I pick up the car, no problem and I have been driving alot not a problem with the tint. :)

And yes replacing it will cost an arm n a leg, cause like 666dan said it is also the car's attenna.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This sounds very old of me, however since buying the Tiguan shit box, my view on shit boxes have changed.
    • I've looked up the parts number (41011AL501). It's around $700 OEM. Usually our Infiniti G35 here in Canada have interchangeable parts with my Stagea but the parts number are not the same. I have looked around and it seems the JDM 2005 V35 Skyline (which is the same as our G35) has the same caliper but I cannot confirm. And I can't find a repair kit. The inner brake pads drags on the rotor, seems to be rusty piston. Thanks for the info by the way
    • This coupled with 6-9 speed autos with ridiculously short gearing is why these modern shitbox cars always seem so fast off the line. If it wasn't for those things, Raptors would not seem fast. The problem we have is there is a driveability gap between a more gentle take off and a wheelspinning sideways launch. The difference between ankle flex required to achieve one and ankle flex required to achieve the other is about 0.5°.
    • Yeah I think I'm also with the opposite here. It's 'hard to keep up with traffic' because in the real world I'm accelerating with 15% throttle and they are pinning it. It feels like I'm being an overt dickhead at anything above 15% throttle, so the car sounds like I'm being an overt dickhead to keep up with/get ahead of traffic when I'm really just trying to drive with traffic. There would be no issue 'keeping up with traffic' if we used the same level of throttle input/aggression to drive around. People really do just drive around with their foot nearly pinned in econoboxes.
    • To be fair it's the other way around. 300kw is boring in a modern Golf or BMW. They are so competent / well-engineered / devoid of emotion that you have to go stupid fast to feel anything. Whereas the <300kw RB still makes all the right noises and it feels good to drive. Can pull off at the lights with the turbo whooshing and the blow-off pssshing and feel like the coolest kid on the block. Just don't look to the side where you'll see the bored housewifes in their shitbox Yaris/Corolla/Camry that kept up because you didn't go fast at all
×
×
  • Create New...