Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Now to work the upper back for glory!

Wide Grip Bodyweight Pullups. Can you do 20/30/40/50? If not , now is your time to try.

Rules:

  • No bouncing up /kipping - Each rep is to come to a complete stop at the bottom of the ROM.
  • Arms are straight in the bottom of the rep, no bent elbows
  • No chalk
  • No straps
  • No gloves
  • No Touching the floor
  • No resting at the bottom of the rep, 1-2 second pause at the top if you want but, no resting the chin up there (it's your funeral)
  • Hand grip is to be wider than shoulder width.
  • Chin over the bar at the top.

Challenge starts now. Ends last day of Feb.

Edited by rev210
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/419064-pullup-challenge/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 192
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Supinated/pronated/either?

Allowed to have knees bent or straight legs too?

It's a pullup as opposed to a chin up .so hands over the top of the bar. No chin up grip.

The pullup bar is to be a single bar style .__-----------__

Not the peg style. -I-------I-

No leg movement (kipping) so as long as they are still through the movement , straight or bent is fine (whatever works)

Supinated/pronated/either?

Imagine doing a wide grip chin up with a supinated grip. My wrists elbows and shoulders are crying just thinking about it.

So are they essentially dead hang pull ups?

Even with bent legs I almost touch the ground when doing them on my power rack and in pretty sure my elbows would still be a bit bent...

Edited by Mitcho_7

Imagine doing a wide grip chin up with a supinated grip. My wrists elbows and shoulders are crying just thinking about it.

Grip only had to be wider than shoulders, it wouldn't be that bad.

This will be interesting for me, as I normally do wide grip pulldown behind neck, rather than in front. Should have plenty of translation though.

interesting choice of challenge for a tall, heavy bloke... this one suited to the lighter guys... I used to be able to do 20+ but reckon I'll struggle with anything over 15 at the moment

Well nows your chance to get back (pun) into shape. If you want to go heavier in the deads and bench , this will help as well. Use some scapular retraction at the top of the movement. Maybe not so much for the challenge but, in general.

.

bit harder when you are heavy but, as an example here is a 100kg bloke.for 20. Form and technique as about right for what this is.

remember no vid / no register.

I'll just add to this...this guy rests at the bottom of the last few reps...do not do this, as per rules in first post.

too many dumb rules...like no chalk for example.

Or no resting. Stopping at the bottom or the top makes it harder, not easier, it's not a rest. Don't believe me, then do cadence pull-ups instead.

No kipping, chest to bar/head over bar, arms lockout, overhand grip.

That's all that had to be said.

too many dumb rules...like no chalk for example.

Or no resting. Stopping at the bottom or the top makes it harder, not easier, it's not a rest. Don't believe me, then do cadence pull-ups instead.

No kipping, chest to bar/head over bar, arms lockout, overhand grip.

That's all that had to be said.

Seriously do you 'need' chalk to do pullups? I used to be able to do 40 without chalk but, maybe there are people with sweaty hands that need it. Otherwise it's just an aid to get slightly more efficient and some people don't have access to it. You might do more with it but, everyone is going to do without. I didn't use chalk for the deadlift challenge, didn't have any to use.

Rules say you can pause at the top, as you say it's not a rest (I noted it's your funeral). Hanging at the bottom allows the backmuscles some rest at the expense of grip fatigue, thats why it's a no no.

Just be thankfull I didn't ask for people to be wearing a clown suit and do a 1 second static hold mid rep up and down.ha ha....

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...