Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 74
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

One question ,If you got the tomei dumps and manifolds ceramic coated inside and outside would that help protect them.

In theory it should

Rapid changes in temp contribute to manifold crack. The ceramic coating should greatly reduce heat transfer and allow for slower heating/cooling cycles reducing thermal shock.

In theory it should

Rapid changes in temp contribute to manifold crack.

Indeed.

Along with weight of exhausts poorly hung and movement of exhausts as well when used on circuit, another big factor.

Typical street driven cars don't seem to crack them. It's the guys doing circuit or 400rwkw+ and solid driving that seem to kill them. Your 350rwkw street car would probably be fine... But then... Stock manifolds are fine for that so why bother really? :merli:

Go with stockers, reliable and cheap! (Breaking a Tomei set makes people cry as you gotta take the turbo side out to fix/replace).

-9s 350kw on 98 built 2.6 full boost 22psi by 3800rpm earlier depending on weather

Don't you remember the ride I took you on...

i do and it was awesome still brings a stupid grin to my face i just think its going to be way to hard for me to get everything perfect to get it setup like yours to make the power i want i dont want to get to the end of my build and be dissapointed :unsure:

i do and it was awesome still brings a stupid grin to my face i just think its going to be way to hard for me to get everything perfect to get it setup like yours to make the power i want i dont want to get to the end of my build and be dissapointed :unsure:

As i keep saying - you've got a LOT more to put into the driveline/suspension yet. Nick has a well sorted set-up and that's what makes it fast in the roundy roundy stuff, not just the power (which is still good) of course).

My R33 R was SOOooooo much more fun to drive, and faster, with the suspension/brakes/diffs/transfer case all done. So much so that if I was doing another build I'd do all that first before going for power. I drove a mates R33 R without decent suspension/diff/transfer case and it was nowhere near as fast as mine. Both cars had similar engine builds/brakes/power

As i keep saying - you've got a LOT more to put into the driveline/suspension yet. Nick has a well sorted set-up and that's what makes it fast in the roundy roundy stuff, not just the power (which is still good) of course).

My R33 R was SOOooooo much more fun to drive, and faster, with the suspension/brakes/diffs/transfer case all done. So much so that if I was doing another build I'd do all that first before going for power. I drove a mates R33 R without decent suspension/diff/transfer case and it was nowhere near as fast as mine. Both cars had similar engine builds/brakes/power

im worried about getting the ceramics off the engine bay as a first priority then im sorting the suspension

Yeah that is always a good idea (I more meant building motors and what not, should've been clearer :))

haha im trying to plan forward so what i buy now will be applicable when i start to build over engineer so stuff dosnt break

IMHO response and all thar fluff costs thousands and adds a few kws to the party. Just get a good spread of power and spend the thousands you have just saved on actually punting the car at the occassional track days

This got it right on page 1

Prime example here in Vic is everyone said you needed 380rwkw to get a GTR into the 'teens' at Sandown. Then one day it was done solidly with 330rwkw and full weight. It came down to the things mentioned earlier - and a driver with experience and knowledge of his car :)

Put -9s on (so its still responsive around town), and spend time/money in getting the car sorted in the more important areas - especially seat time, as you'll chop times consistently for years In most cases especially as you develop the car. Enjoy milling over that for the next month lol :merli:

Only his reasoning for improved times is wrong :) It had more to do with the tech of tyres and change from RE55s to AO50s. The change from 98-100ROn to E85...those two factors alone mean there is no point comparing times...not to mention the final factor that tracks are being re-surfaces. Sandown is faster simply because of re-surfacing and now PI is >1.5seconds quicker due to re-surfacing.

But to the core of the question. The things that increase response. Well everything is a compromise and trade off. But the main things are to reduce inertia so smaller lighter materials for things like turbo wheels, tailshaft, accessories on the front of the engine. Reponse comes from good culinder filling and gas velocity so as others have touched on dont go crazy big bore on inelt pipes and headwork.

If you want Mines like response just put 2 stroke/rotary like gearing in your car and the need to swap gears every 2 seconds will have you thinking you are driving the most responsive car in the world :) But silly statement but raises the intersting point is to look at gearing and diff chanegs are an option.

If you are talking engines then bin the head. Get an RB25 R33 or R34 head, put an built for purpose inlet manifold on the car and just jam fist fulls of boost into it

Only his reasoning for improved times is wrong :) It had more to do with the tech of tyres and change from RE55s to AO50s. The change from 98-100ROn to E85...those two factors alone mean there is no point comparing times...not to mention the final factor that tracks are being re-surfaces. Sandown is faster simply because of re-surfacing and now PI is >1.5seconds quicker due to re-surfacing.

There is every point. It's the whole point about car development over time and making improvements in various areas. If tyre changes simply meant no point, then why bother even comparing anything? Tyres are always going to evolve just like car set-ups.

Go back 5-6 years then with AO50s and resurfacing - those times still wouldn't have been done as there is still improvements being made, such is the nature of developing a car.

There is every point. It's the whole point about car development over time and making improvements in various areas. If tyre changes simply meant no point, then why bother even comparing anything? Tyres are always going to evolve just like car set-ups.

Go back 5-6 years then with AO50s and resurfacing - those times still wouldn't have been done as there is still improvements being made, such is the nature of developing a car.

Yeh, its always a matter of factors. But the 3 biggest factors are tyres, track and E85...so car development is a far smaller variable. Take them off E85 and put them back on RE55s if you want a good indication of just how much the cars have really developed

come on guys there must be other ways to get more out of the bottom end im curious and want to learn

How's your bank account look?...VCAM is another option...

or rather than chasing the power at low rpm, what about lightening the rotational load (carbon shafts, carbon clutch etc) to help response

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Try looking at Eibacb/H&R springs Thats what Gary sourced for mine.
    • Hey y'all! I'm curious about how y'all go about widebodying your cars. I noticed that when running a square setup, my front wheels are a bit more tucked in than my rear wheels. Not by much, maybe 5-10mm. This leads me to wonder - when I widebody, should I use narrower front flares and wider rear flares? I found a set of 40mm rear flares that I really like, and was thinking of pairing them with some 18mm front flares, but I don't want the car to look strange. How have others done this? Note, I'm in a sedan. Thanks!
    • And if it was anything other than an auto tranny part, it might be a problem. But seeing as all auto trannies belong in the recycling bin, it's fine.
    • I have an R32 Fenix rad. It is good.
    • All the schemas I can see, indicate your typical setup of ATF 'cooler' (read: heat exchanger) in the bottom radiator tank..ie; https://nissan.epc-data.com/stagea/wgnc34/5413-rb25det/engine/214/ ...but I can prattle on a bit here. These trannies have a thermistor in the sump ~ the TCU reads this and 1. bumps the line pressure up when the ATF is 'cold' and 2. prevents the TC lockup clutch from operating, until the ATF comes up to minimum operating temp (keeps the ATF 'churning' through the TC so it heats up quicker) -- trigger point is around 55C. In these conditions, the engine coolant temperature rises faster than the ATF temperature, and also helps heat the ATF up, which is why it's best to think of the in radiator tank setup as a heat exchanger ; the heat can flow in both directions... ...with these trannies, the 'hot' ATF comes out the front banjo bolt, flows through the cooler/heat exchanger, and returns to the box  via the rear banjo bolt. This gets a mention, due to the wildly different opinions wrt running auto trans fluid coolers ~ do you bypass the in radiator tank altogether, or put the cooler inline with the in radiator tank system...and then, do you put the additional cooler before of after the in radiator tank system?... ....fact is the nominal engine operating temp (roughly 75C), happens to be the ideal temperature for the ATF used in these trannies as well (no surprises there), so for the in radiator tank system to actually 'cool' the ATF, the ATF temp has to be hotter than that...lets say 100C -- you've got 25C of 'excess' heat, (slowly) pumping into the 75C coolant. This part of the equation changes drastically, when you've got 100C ATF flowing through an air cooled radiator ; you can move a lot more excess heat, faster ~ it is possible to cool the ATF 'too much' as it were...(climate matters a lot)... ...in an 'ideal' setup, what you're really trying to control here, is flash heating of the ATF, primarily produced by the TC interface. In a perfect world, wrt auto trans oil cooling, you want a dedicated trans cooler with builtin thermostatic valving - they exist. These should be run inline and before the in radiator tank system ~ when 'cold' the valving bypasses the fin stack, allowing the ATF to flow direct to the in radiator tank heat exchanger, so it works 'as intended' with helping heat the ATF up. When 'hot' (iirc it was 50C threshold), the valving shuts forcing the ATF through the cooler fin stack, and onto the in radiator tank heat exchanger...and you sort of think of it as a 'thermal conditioner' of sorts...ie; if you did cool your ATF down to 65C, the coolant will add a little heat, otherwise it works as intended... ...the 'hot' ATF coming from the front bango bolt, is instantiated from the TC when in use, so all/any flash heated oil, flows to the fluid-to-air cooler first, and because of the greater heat differential, you can get rid of this heat fast. Just how big (BTU/h) this cooler needs to be to effectively dissipate this TC flash heat, is the charm...too many variables to discuss here, but I just wanted to point out the nitty-gritty of automatic trans fluid coolers ~ they're a different beastie to what most ppl think of when considering an 'oil cooler'... /3.5cents   
×
×
  • Create New...