Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

You can tune Low and HIgh Octane fuel and timing maps 16*16 resolution, knock sensitivity, acceleration pumps, CLT and MAT compensation tables. A knock sensor that actually retards timing when it sensors a certain level. It basically retains all of the original functions its just that with the software you will be able to alter these values to the new desire tune.

  • Replies 83
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

You can tune Low and HIgh Octane fuel and timing maps 16*16 resolution, knock sensitivity, acceleration pumps, CLT and MAT compensation tables.  A knock sensor that actually retards timing when it sensors a certain level.  It basically retains all of the original functions its just that with the software you will be able to alter these values to the new desire tune.

have i miss something here but the pfc has 20*20 resolution amd can be tune for what ever octane fuel you like ,has great knock sensor sensitivty (or why would australias fastest gtr ( KW) still retain a pfc and hand controller when he is running a fully optioned motec).The pfc also runs compensation tables ?

It runs the lower octane map if you put lower octane fuel in it that. It has sensitivity but no ability to retard the timing.

The thing is the standard computer is more consistent than the PFC and doesn't need any higher resolution, the interpolation and extrapolation is exceptional. How much do you think nissan spent developing their ECU compared to APEXI I would say about a whole F***load more.

The PFC is very powerfull computer dont get me wrong, its ok to tune and although a little nintendo like it does create a nice tune. THe difference comes in calculating the transitions and acceleration rates and predicting where the motor is heading thats what make a good computer. Try to think outside the box or inside the box I should say!

So the only difference you can show is the to ability the retard when knock level reached the rest is your personal option, as who can truely say what company sent on development but i can say the std computer was only design to run 208kw where the development of the pfc was 208kw to 1000kw+ (apexi 8sec drag car runs pfc). To call the pfc inconsistent is a big call, as it must be close to the world most used after market ecu on the rb series engine. The pfc ability to control large injectors at low % operation is nothing short of remarkable and i must have talked to a dozen other tuner who have had not a problem with the units ability .Personally i have met an unhappy pfc owner but thats only my experience unfortunately i can't say the same the same for alot of the others(wolf,mines chipped ecu,etc).

But if the pfc is so lacking and inconsistent as you say i'm sure you will find a large market for your home grown software and really how could a company the size of APEXI compete with you at home on your laptop.

how do you intend to re-burn the chip for the R33 ECU?

From what ive seen and dabbled in a loooong time ago in a galaxy far far away

The Stock 33 ECU has a totally different type of chip. It can only be burnt once, not overwritten.

To be overwritten you'd need to convert it via a daughterboard or similar to have a basic R32 setup... or follow a costly burning route. Which everytime you want a retune is gonna cost you $$$$

My old R33 ECU has this setup, but it was one of very few ever seen out of Japan.

It runs the lower octane map if you put lower octane fuel in it that.  It has sensitivity but no ability to retard the timing.  

are you saying this about the PowerFC or stocker ecu?

The software I'm making is just a way of editing the factory computer. Sure there are limits of the factory ECU of which I dont know yet but as I've said around 400rwkw is what i've seen and it drove beautifully.

I never said that the PFC was inconsistent I just said that the standard ECU is more consistent, more powerful with mathematical calculations. The thing is how many skylines out there are over 400rwkw - not that many I would suggest. This is where my software will hopefully bridge the gap.

I will say that the PFC is shit for tuning time but so are the likes of Wolf. The datalogit type software should be standard software with PFC IMHO. PFC is also my preference for the skyline in regards to aftermarket computers so dont get me wrong I'm not underestimating it at all.

Dont knock the home PC thats where Bill Gates came from.

how do you intend to re-burn the chip for the R33 ECU?

From what ive seen and dabbled in a loooong time ago in a galaxy far far away

The Stock 33 ECU has a totally different type of chip. It can only be burnt once, not overwritten.

To be overwritten you'd need to convert it via a daughterboard or similar to have a basic R32 setup... or follow a costly burning route. Which everytime you want a retune is gonna cost you $$$$  

My old R33 ECU has this setup, but it was one of very few ever seen out of Japan.

are you saying this about the PowerFC or stocker ecu?

The standard ECU, if it detects more knock than what it has learnt it will revert to a lower octane map of where the timing numbers are reduced.

Ahh dont really want to reveal at this stage. Sorry

A properly tuned PowerFC wont knock ;)

So there is no need to revert to a less powerful map.

And dont forget you can put sh|t pertol in and just alter the figure with the H/C via the PFC.

I've done that before loads of times when i cant find premium nearby.

takes all of 15seconds to knock timing out of it

well once you do its gonna be easy enough to copy anyhow mate :)

rest assured.

But it cant be much differet to what i have mentioned above from what ive seen

as alot of you guys said it is not only the computer you have too look at it is the tuner too, i have seen alot of power maid with the rb26 using a dta it was some where around 860hp to be exact and i am personally using an electromotive on my rb26 and looking to get around the same power or maybe more if i can, i really think all the computers are good it is the tuner who has to know what he is doing.

I know. I have been doing it for the past year and its not something you can sell to a mechanic. He most likely has a HEx editor that displays data that is being accessed at that exact moment. If you've seen the current software you would now its just tables and tables of hexidecimal code.

Such a negative bunch aren't we.

I run an Autronic SMC in my race car. For a race car it's perfect, for the street it does more than what you really need but if you like tweaking engines i don't think you'll find much better.

So they are $1800 or so and then you need all the compatible sensors to run it, but I'll bet you have more horsepower per dollar when compared to another type of ecu setup on a similar engine. If not more horsepower you'll have better drivability/ torque.

Turbine.

Rob82,

Have you had any experience tuning the stock ecu's with RX7 550cc high imp. injectors and the rb20?

I remember Martin had issues with trying to obtain a decent idle.

RX7 injectors being squirters they don't atomize fuel too well, that combined with the 2ltr 6cyl it doesn't work too well. :D

Rob82,

Have you had any experience tuning the stock ecu's with RX7 550cc high imp. injectors and the rb20?

I remember Martin had issues with trying to obtain a decent idle.

RX7 injectors being squirters they don't atomize fuel too well, that combined with the 2ltr 6cyl it doesn't work too well. :D

We have a R32 GTS4 RB20DET with quite a few mods done to it, also with those injectors installed.

If we did'nt tell anyone they were in their, they would'nt know the difference with the idle and low RPM stability. This is with the standard ecu.

http://www.turboclub.com/Australia/Members...GTS4_AWD_21.jpg

Turbine

I think we need to clarify a few things;

1. In our race team cars we have a number of different ECU's (Power FC's, Motec's, Microtech's, Autronic's and even an Electromotive in the SuperTourer). I can tell you that I truly believe only the PFC gives driveability as "nice" as the standard ECU with a very sensible amount of set up and tuning time. We can install a PFC and get a reasonably modified Skyline to run very nicely for ~$1300 (including the cost of the PFC). We can also get a Skyline to run nicely on a Motec, but it will cost closer to $5,000 and it won't make 1% more power either.

2. On line tuning for R32/Z32/S13 vintage ECU's has been around for years. Plenty of tuners have the software and the experience to carry out that process. The cost is usually around $800, being $500 for the rechip and $300 for the tune.

The problem is I can buy a Power FC for $950 now, that takes similar tuning time to a rechip of the standard ecu. So for $450 extra I get the Commander, which saves me buying a whole heap of gauges and gives me superior diagnostic ability to the Consult style readers (which cost $300 or so on their own).

3.There is considerable difficulty with rechipping the later vintage ECU's (R33GTST, R34GTT, Stagea S1 & S2 and R34GTR). Since R33GTST is the most popular model currently modified, this issue is not to be underestimated. There are some Japanese tuned (rechip via daughter board)) ECU's around, but their cost makes my nose bleed.

Buying a Power FC for this vintage is even more worthwhile with the same advantages (as above) plus a lower cost than the currently available rechips.

Is it any wonder that the PFC is the most popular ECU.:(

Yes cubes, the car feels fine at light load and cruise. Economy is good enough to drive out along the great ocean road from melbourne with the car club.

The real trick was to modify the standard airflow meter so that it sees or feels the same air velocity across the sensor as it would if it had the stock turbo still on it. But it's mass is increased dramatically.

It was difficult to figure but it works. We have had a few tuners baffled by this when they get told what size those injectors are on a stock ecu.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Don't even try to run it on the stock ECU if you're going to have the boost controller bring boost above ~10 psi. I've already told you that. If you use the Nistune ECU, you will need to CAREFULLY read the available documentation for Neo tuning, and read some threads on the Nistune forums, to discover the various things you have to do to prevent the ECU from going bananas when the boost is too high. The is a table associated with th boost sensor that must be modified to prevent it from shitting the bed. This is just one of the things that you will need to do to the tune in Nistune, because the Neo turbo ECU will be expecting to see a number of things (such as the TCS) that are not there, and you have to block the DTCs on those. It is totally not surprising to me that you are having the problems that you are, but the solutions to these problems have been known for >15 years. So just get it done.
    • Hi. Sry iam not a mechanic and iam not at the car atm so i dont know 100% but they told they measure those and even try to change those. AFM they have two. Coils are new a they have my old one too. Plugs too. ECU...we have 25 NEO stock and Nistune 25 NEO.   But i dont know if any one those could be the problem and why/if/what can cause this, Only thing they did not check is fuel...but that walbro 255 is new(like 1,5 years)... That fuel pressure gauge idk...but i let them know Any suggestions?   EDIT: how can they know if it is like you say he ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high? Tha car has boost controler
    • Can you clarify what you mean by boost cut, do you mean it misfires both when under load (driving) and when stationary and out of gear? Or does the ECU pull power when it reaches a specific boost level that is too high (boost control issue)? Does it occur at idle with no throttle? When you say "the ECU is OK", what ECU is it and why do you think it is OK? Have you used the NEO ECU, and if so do you have a MAP sensor attached? Same for the AFM, why do you think it is OK? Do you have any way to put a fuel pressure gauge on it (even just a mechanical one between the fuel filter and fuel rail)?
    • Hi.. Just another problem. So maybe you can help. I(my mechanic) done swap from my RB20DE NEO to RB25DET NEO. Everything is OK but we have a boost cut. Coils/Plugs are ok...AFM is ok. ECU is ok. I have Walbro 255 but it "changed" sound few months ago(you can hear it ouside) you did not hear that when it was new(maybe faulty?) Sooo...what now? What can cause this boost cut? It is even when you standing still...
×
×
  • Create New...