Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

So a friend recently purchased a R33 GTS-T, he's taken it to the pits to find out what needed to be done to get it registered it the ACT, unfortunately, they picked up that the chassis rail is damaged.

Question is, has anyone experienced a damage chassis rail and the cost in getting it repaired?

He doesn't know the extend of the damage yet.

It's booked in next week for assessment.

Cheers for your opinions.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421143-damaged-chassis-rail/
Share on other sites

* Sometimes the rail is irreparable > replacement of the rail OR the car can't be blue slipped

* Sometimes the section can be boxed > welded

* Sometimes a hole can be drilled through the rail > threaded > pulled down

Booked in for next week. Fingers crossed it goes well.

The RTA did say it's repairable (Whether or not he knew what he was talking about), but hopefully it is repairable, that's my main concern atm.

(OP is referring to me).

What came back as so expensive? what did they say?

It's not on paper as of yet because he didn't quote the parts (He had to ask Nissan), however, the 2k so far is for the labour, enlightenment machine ($500) and signing the paper for RTA ($500). The quote isn't down on paper due to the quote unfinished

, but I need 4 segmented parts, which is an unknown cost atm.

It feels retarded, but cheapest in town apparently. I didn't notice the damage, but it's pretty bad. What is more retarded is that the car drives perfectly fine and perfectly straight. It's just the RTA being dogs.

Does this car still have valid registration in another state? If so, which one?

+1 for pics!

It has 1 month in NSW Rego.

Once the lad gets the full quote he will send me an e-mail with everything. He just needs to make a phonecall or two.

I'm pretty much seeking a R33 SR2 rolling shell as of now, unless the quote is going to be cheaper then I expect.

Don't NSW cars need to be inspected for rego renewal? where as in ACT they can just randomly call for an inspection?

Change of ownership I'm guessing is mandatory inspect in ACT & NSW aswell. (Jeremy only just bought it)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...