Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

it ain't glamorous and it ain't fun... but when you do it regularly magical things start happening... an awesome exercise if your feeling stressed or frustrated... a proper squat session is like nothing else, it gives you an awesome appetite and you sleep like a baby

and it cures cancer... obviously

my old man is nearly 70, 65kg and does 5 sets of 20 reps with 60kg... don't let a senior citizen out squat you!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422559-squattin/page/2/#findComment-6802596
Share on other sites

I was watching the fattest losers last night while eating a bowl of ice cream with cookies and maple syrup... and before it came back from an ad break, the commando was on giving a "TIP".

I cheered and did fist pumps like I had just won lotto..

There was the commando, Barbell on his traps.

And it goes something like this.

C - "Here is an exercise that will not only help you lose weight but also give you an all body workout and get you strong" Squats!

me - "here we go.. time to see some 1/4 squats to make sure the knees are safe"

C - "If you want, start with a broom stick to get used to the position... what you want to do is put the bar across the back of your shoulders, pull your shoulders back to create a platform there, have your feet shoulder width apart, take a breath in, then sink down and back keeping your knees out until you are at the bottom (he was well below parallel), then push back up. Everything moves up together, everything stays tight"

me - "Holy shit!!"

C - "get some weight on to the bar and start by doing 3 sets of 10 reps then increase the resistance. If you are over 40, you may need to be more careful of your joints.. I recommend *insert some brand of joint formula here*" (pumps out nice full depth reps as it fades off to an ad with the other male trainer and same joint care formula)

me - *choking on a cookie I didn't fully chew* "f**k yeah!! - Do some squats you fatties.. get that up ya!!!!"

Didn't even care that it was an ad for some shit.

Edited by TTT
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422559-squattin/page/2/#findComment-6802670
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

inb4 Birds' squat thread

Currently:

60kg x 10

70kg x 10

80kg x 10

90kg x 5

60kg x 10

70kg x 10

80kg x 10

90kg x 5

95kg x 2

Watch this space for big improvements, given I can only work legs at the moment. May start dropping to 5 rep sets, as my warmups are taxing me up top quite a bit...though its not as it I'm not making gains.

The ATG squat has a bias towards glutes and adductors, so I'm smashing leg press after squats to give the quads a good bashing too. After this and hamstring curls, I start walking like a zombie.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422559-squattin/page/2/#findComment-6814200
Share on other sites

if you want more quad work try front squats with an olympic stance

you could squat twice a week... do one day with high reps, light weight... sets of 10-20... then do a heavy day where you do very light warm ups then do 5 x 5 or even 5 x 3

in the above your mixing both... which as you say makes you too tired when it gets heavy

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422559-squattin/page/2/#findComment-6814228
Share on other sites

Or I could squat 4 times a week, 2 for light weights and 2 for heavy :D

Good suggestion though. Might allow my legs to recover quicker too.

Can't really do front stance, as I think it will aggravate my supraspinatus. I'm lucky that i can bend my arms enough for high bar. My quads do get plenty of work, don't get me wrong...but it's nice to add that little extra with the leg press and to finish them off in a way that squats can't without losing form. I was considering mixing up the parallels with ATG so that I get a bit more quad action going on there and have more strength for getting out of a half way hole.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422559-squattin/page/2/#findComment-6814288
Share on other sites

60kg x 10

70kg x 10

80kg x 10

90kg x 5

95kg x 2

60kg x 10

70kg x 10

80kg x 10

90kg x 6

95kg x 3

Might add a 6th/1RM set to this so I can start using it to leverage my sets of reps and up their weight. 100 should be fairly doable for a start.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/422559-squattin/page/2/#findComment-6818205
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...