Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hi, im planing on throwing a bolt on setup onto my standard Rb2det

Set up is a hypergear SS2 (top mount), external gate, adaptronics ECU (mafless tune), forward facing greddy plenum FPR and injectors etc....

Im unsure of the injectors. I will only run the car on pump fuel for now and i want to push over 300 atw... something around the 320 mark i hope looking at the 300kw thread.

Ok here are the questions:

*Can i use side feed injectors on a forward facing plenum? (will probably go top feed anyway)

*what size injector can i run without maxing out the duty cycle? ( i was going to go ID1000 so i can go flex fuel later but still unsure)

*If i go with the ID1000's will it still idle well?

*size external gate i should run? (hoping to be tuned on 18-20 psi. Had a read on flow calculations to determin the correct size but i am still unsure)

Appreciate the help

Just use ID1000s. Everyone here swears by them and they idle at least as well as factory injectors.

Sidefeed vs top feed depends more on the fuel rail than the plenum. As you didn't indicate exactly which engine (you called it an RB2DET...no telling if it was 20, 25 or 25Neo) it's a bit hard to say whether the plenum you plan to use is suited to either sort. All that's really important is that you have to be able to bolt the rail down to the manifold.

Are you aware that FFPs don't offer any benefit except clearing your topmount?

series 2 RB25 from a R33 sorry.

Yep, the FFP was to reduce the cooler piping, neaten the bay and let me go top feed with no clearance issues. Doesent help flow at all?

Also are aftermarket RB26 injectors compatable with the Rb25 or little modification?

Edited by Streetglow

i am running nismo 740 side feed injectors in standard fuel rail on a greedy FFP - tuner said that set up with my turbo will give 300kw on pump and E85 (another member here hit 304) but i will be upgrading to id1000 and top feed which my tuner recommended so might as well go the good ones up front -

ah cheers for the reply... yeah i was going to go 740DW then upgrade later but i think ill just go the ID1000.

so you'll need an aftermarket rail for the ID's, theres a write up in the DIY section, there not easy to setup but doable.

Edited by AngryRBGTX

I'm using power enterprise 850 injectors. They cost abit more but they are very good and direct drop in. They started to go lean at 430rwkws, but that is above the maximum efficiency of the SS2 turbocharger.

Those injectors where bought from CJmotors

I'm running a 50mm gate made by my self, So I can make you one if you are not in a hurry or use a turbosmart 50mm gate.

44-45mm is usually perfect

I'm using power enterprise 850 injectors. They cost abit more but they are very good and direct drop in. They started to go lean at 430rwkws, but that is above the maximum efficiency of the SS2 turbocharger.

Those injectors where bought from CJmotors

I'm running a 50mm gate made by my self, So I can make you one if you are not in a hurry or use a turbosmart 50mm gate.

so what actually determines the size of the gate? boost? size of turbo? power?

how much would a vband gate be if you made one?

Edited by Streetglow
  • 4 weeks later...

so what actually determines the size of the gate? boost? size of turbo? power?

the gate size is determined by the diameter of the actual wastegate port that sets against the manifold.

That doesn't really answer the question?

I remember reading something like:

Big turbo low boost - big gate

Big turbo big boost - med/ big gate

Small turbo low boost - small gate

Small turbo big boost - small/med gate

Because the bigger the turbo the more flow, the lower the boost the longer the gate is open etc.

I could be wrong this is just my understanding, anyone elaborate?

you're correct..

as you run more boost, you flow more exhaust gasses into the turbine to generate pressure, i.e. less exhaust gasses are diverted to the gate.

If you're running less boost, it's more ideal to run a slightly larger gate to prevent boost creep.

you're correct..

as you run more boost, you flow more exhaust gasses into the turbine to generate pressure, i.e. less exhaust gasses are diverted to the gate.

If you're running less boost, it's more ideal to run a slightly larger gate to prevent boost creep.

Is there ever a gate-too-big situation?

I'm planning a gtx3076 on 20-24psi rb25det. Would a 38/40mm gate be to small?

Not really sure how gate sizing goes with a mid framed turbo on med/high boost...

If your gate flows too well (or is too big) the controller may have issues holding flat pressure, somewhere around 45mm would work well in your situation. It is all related to the pressure in the exhaust manifold and the angle the wastegate is mounted more so than the size.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...