Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hello skyliners

just a quick question for now

i got myself a nicely rebuilt forged gtr this weekend gone

it has a power fc big single turbo 700cc injectors running 17psi and plan to up it to 20 or 25 psi but has stock air flow meters

i got told to go to z32 or r33 air flow meters but i was thinking would a map sensor be better ???

**can the power fc support a map sensor with another tune??

**would a map sensor be more recommended over bigger air flow meters??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/423946-power-fc-and-map-sensor/
Share on other sites

That's why you would have a d detro just to run a map. You get the power fc to run a maf. But get a vipec or autronic (whatever it's called) if you getting another computer to run map. Much better ecu

you can't run map sensors on the l-jetro powerfc (the airflow meter version)

youd have to sell it and buy the d-jetro version and buy the map sensors and get it tuned

you shouldnt max twin z32s and its probably comparable to cost vs selling your current setup and buying a map sensor based system

Go adaptronic/vipec/link ect. Map sensor capable and a better ecu also can run dual maps for e85 and 98. Although nothing wrong with a PFC and twin z32s. You'll be doing pretty well to max twin z32s out.

Cheers Josh

just go map, everything works so much better and you can clean up your pipe work. i have had so many issues because of a maf setup that would be prevented with a map. plus if you get a map it will be with a better ecu.

Forget the FC and go a real ECU. Link, Vipec, Blackbox.

For the money you're going to spend on installation with the Power FC WITH the MAP sensors, you're much better off with another option. HOMEWORK!

ViPec and I assume Link plug ins work well and can used with either either MAFs or MAP . Goes in you std ECUs case so looks factory at a glance . I already had a Tech Edge wide band to do the oxygen sensing stuff but the V88 has all that std if you only want one box .

IMO you need WB 02 input and the ECU the ability to trim mixtures set by an AFR target table - for road anyway .

I'm far from being a good tuner but I fiddled all my start light load and cruise settings and I'm getting around (in Sydney) 13-14/100 on E70 . My 25 now uses MAP after having a PFC and Z32 and while I did get a bit better consumption with my tuning towards the end with the Apexi I wouldn't go back . I'm still learning with Vipec and MAP sensing and its slowly getting better and with modern injectors like IDs should be better again .

Be choosy with larger injectors because the best motorsport computer on the planet can't improve old tech injector abilities at really low pulse widths .

My computer reckons I'm idling at 1% injector duty cycle and its not too bad but could be a little smoother .

If I was you I'd get modern injectors first and change them over when the next computer is fitted and tuned .

A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...