Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How crazy is this?!

I know the new xr6 turbo has been brought up before but with power like this its probly going to dominate all!!

BA Falcon Turbo

10.9 second quarter mile

405kW ATW

12-injector manifold

Standard turbo

Tweaked auto trans

Completely streetable car

http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_2144/article.html

-----------------------------------------------

And the new FPV Typhoon:

Being released end of 2004

Turbo-charged 4.0-Litre DOHC 24 valve 6 Cyl.

Max Power: 270kw @ 5,250rpm

Max Torque: 550Nm @ 2,000 to 4,250rpm

http://www.fpv.com.au/swf/f6typhoon.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42421-does-this-bother-you/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 63
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I like it :rofl:

Altho ide be a little :D at a 10.9 from 405 Kw at the wheels

Besides their weight, and lack of sports car looks, there pretty cool

-10.9 was done on slicks too

It still amazes me how advanced japanese engines are, the XR6T is a 4.0 L turbo.

Making 250kw.

GTR engine is only 2.6, and is very close to 250kw, even tho its stated to be 206

Bring on the new GTR! 300kw from a 3.2L :aroused:

"It still amazes me how advanced japanese engines are, the XR6T is a 4.0 L turbo.

Making 250kw.

GTR engine is only 2.6, and is very close to 250kw, even tho its stated to be 206"

You’re comparing a motor that has been in production for maybe a year to a motor that has been around for how many years?

Development takes time and dollars. Because a motor makes xx hp/ci, doesn’t make it more technologically advanced than another. Otherwise a 350 chev would be one of the most advanced motors when it comes to hp/ci.

Upset at 10.9 from 405rwkw? Who cares how much power he made. It’s a brand new ute and it ran 10.9. Bloody good effort.

Looking on the bright side of things, I'd bet my chances on NOT getting pulled over in the XR6 T Ute, than if I were in the Skyline. But can the XR6 take corners?? Either way, apparantley these ford straight sixes are awesome, I have a mate who's building one of these in a 64~Mustang, they're plan is to get Low 10's, and hopefully in the RH-Nines.

I've driven a BA XR8, and it actually cornered a lot better than I thought it would. But even with 240kw or whatever it is (it was stock including suspension), it felt like an absolute slug power-wise due to the excessive weight.

If someone gave me a 10 second XR6T, I wouldn't complain. I'd even drive it proudly and stick a baby seat in the back :D However, that doesn't mean I'd ditch the Skyline or even swap my car preferences. I don't care if the Falcon had twice as much power as the Skyline, it just can't make up for style.

"It still amazes me how advanced japanese engines are, the XR6T is a 4.0 L turbo.  

Making 250kw.  

GTR engine is only 2.6, and is very close to 250kw, even tho its stated to be 206"

You’re comparing a motor that has been in production for maybe a year to a motor that has been around for how many years?  

Development takes time and dollars. Because a motor makes xx hp/ci, doesn’t make it more technologically advanced than another. Otherwise a 350 chev would be one of the most advanced motors when it comes to hp/ci.

Upset at 10.9 from 405rwkw? Who cares how much power he made. It’s a brand new ute and it ran 10.9. Bloody good effort.

they dont just throw an engine together, it would have been in development for years.

the point is that the rb26dett came out in 89 (could be earlier) and compared to a new age engine that is supposed to be the best new technology it still matches up while be a smaller capacity. same for the 1jz and 2jz. therefore it goes to show just how far ahead the japanese are than the rest of the world. also that that an engine can be in production for 15 years and still be one of the best around.

How crazy is this?!

I know the new xr6 turbo has been brought up before but with power like this its probly going to dominate all!!

BA Falcon Turbo  

10.9 second quarter mile  

405kW ATW  

12-injector manifold  

Standard turbo  

Tweaked auto trans  

Completely streetable car  

http://www.autospeed.com.au/cms/A_2144/article.html

also that doesnt look like a std turbo to me.

from all that ive heard the std turbo is quite small.

im probably wrong but i cant imagine ford building a top mount turbo on their cars

People (after market tuners) have only had the engine to play with/modify for 12 months. Like you said, RB26 came out in 89. Many more years of aftermarket tuning have gone into it. How much off the shelf gear can you buy for a RB26 compared to a ford turbo motor? Combinations are well documented for rb26’s you know what works and what doesn’t. With the fords, its never been done before. Nice effort I think.

Im not bagging the rb26, just pointing out that this guys work is a great effort.

the xr6 turbo supposbly has one of the biggest stock turbo's to come out of the factory.

heres a link to a phase kits for the xr6 turbo. the phase 3 runs a 10.98 sec @ 124.87 mph

there making a phase 4 kit soon.

http://www.airpowersystems.com.au/falcon/xr6turbo.htm

they run a GT40 from the factory, quite large indeed.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • That's probably OK. That's a face to face compression joint between two surfaces with the clamping load provided by those bolts. So.... it's unlikely that the bolts will end up feeling that load in shear, unless the clamping surfaces are not large enough, bolts not got enough tension on them, etc etc to prevent the two faces from moving wrt each other. Which... I would hope the designers have considered, seeing as it's probably one of the most important things the upright has to do apart from resist collapsing in its own right. But yes, it would definitely be worth asking them what their safety factor on that part of the design was. I tend to think that the casting, being a casting, is not necessarily the strongest bit of material in the world. It's about an inch square, and when you think about the loads that are being put into it, you have to wonder what safety factor the Nissan boys (and every other OEM engineer who has designed all the millions of other uprights that look essentially the same) used to account for defective casting, aging, severe impacts on the wheel, etc etc. 
    • Those bolts would be orders of magnitude stronger that cast aluminium though.  And its mainly clamping force, not shear they are dealing with?
    • Except all that twisting force that is breaking a cast piece, appears to be going through 4 bolts in the picture Johnny posted of the BryPar one...
    • The smart approach is to use the gearbox loom from the manual car. Makes it a lot easier - just plugs into the switches on the box and plugs into the main loom up near the fusebox. Then you only need to deal with bypassing the inhibit switch. The other approach requires you to use the wiring diagram to identify those wires by colour and location, perhaps even indulging in a little multimeter action to trace them end to end to make sure, and then.... you will have the answers you need. The R34 wiring diagram is available on-line (no, I do not have a link to it myself - I would have to do a search if I wasn't able to go to the copy I have at home).
    • Hi, i’m converted my r34 4dr auto to manual but need help with gearbox wiring. There are bunch of wires no idea which one for speedo drive, neutral, reverse can anyone help me. IMG_6860.mov
×
×
  • Create New...