Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know most people here use HKS GT25s but Im about to go down a different path and try the TRUST route :sly:

I was wondering if anyone here can tell me how different specs of TD06 would perform on a RB25DET, in particular the Compressor housing specs between the 17C, 20G, and 25G

The exhaust housing is pretty straight forward: bigger, more power, more lag

What about the the differences between TD06, TD06S, TD06SH and TD06SL2?

The TD06-17C are usually used on high powered SR20s but anyone every tried them on RB25s?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42446-trust-td-06-different-specs/
Share on other sites

hey got a tdo6 20g with 8cm exhaust housing.. internal wastegate.. you can get 8cm, 10cm, i think 12cm not sure about 14.. but there is a guy with a 16cm i think.. its rob77 he mite post up details. im not sure about any power ratings.. dunt even know about mine.. so if some one could help out please.. im going to convert it to external wastegate i think.. just for the noise (as its a drift car and need all the wank value parts :)) this is going on a rb20 and hopefully isnt too laggy. there was a jms car running a internal wastegated tdo6 19c and he made 306rwkw on 1.6bar with special fuel and ran 235rwkw at a dyno day not sure on boost/fuel etc tho. did run a 11.3 i think on slicks also.. if that helps. oh and that was on rb25/microtech etc etc

How much power you after...a L2-20G is equivalent to a GT2835, a SH-25G maybe too powerful if you want to keep it a street car. I know an Evo with a TD06SH-25G will make 650ps @ 2bars.

Thus the question which is constantly asked, why go L2-20G when the factory Evo turbo can run high 11s and make just as much power (~400ps), same with why go T67 when a TD06 can make just as much. Depends on the car, setup and tuning.

Once my engine was rebuilt with forged pistons we ran up 366hp @ 1bar on a td06-20g 16cm^2 exhuast housing. I had the exhaust housing and dump pipe ceramic coated whilst the engine was in bits and I get full boost by 4300rpm. Do a search on "average power" as that thread has a copy of my dyno sheet. Its such a wild ride now, it goes from ~160hp to ~330hp in the space of 1000rpm. I'd like to try higher boost settings, but without bigger injectors, a decent exhaust manifold (its all bolted onto the stock one) and some cams I dont think its worth it. Only fault I find is the lag, a ball bearing turbo would probably come on boost about 500-800rpm quicker for the same size.

Only fault I find is the lag, a ball bearing turbo would probably come on boost about 500-800rpm quicker for the same size.

Is that a hunch or something that Steve SST etc has told you. My thinking is that it wouldnt be that dramatic, could be wrong, probably am, just interested to know. In the Garret catalogue, what does the 16cm housing equate to, something like a 1.12 or bigger isnt it?

Buster vs B-Man would be a more vaild comparison, both have ~325rwkw peak (Buster 328, B-Man 323). Buster's TD06-25G/10cm rear had more all over the curve, boost coming in 1,000rpm earlier + a higher peak. B-Man's 3040/1.22 A/R is capable of far more - his is only in initial stages of development whereas Buster's was at it's peak.

(I should just shaddup and let both of those guys post here, but I blabber too much)

have a td06-19c internal gate turbs, has been flowed with garret comp wheel (the std comp wheel was shagged) even so the std wheel is very ugly in its design, and tiny too. Havent actually ran this setup yet but getting close (rb20)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Oh, forgot to add, A few months ago I was getting mixture codes and the car was using crap loads of fuel. You could smell the unburned fuel in the exhaust, it was crazy strong. Economy was over 17.5 l/100 and usually around 19. I smoked the engine and found a leaky CCV hose which I replaced and then I replaced my two pre cat O2 sensors, I also replaced the MAF. This fixed my mixture codes and improved my exonomy but I'm still 14 - 15 l/100 when pottering about town so something is still amiss. Throttle response is much better and it has more pep but I'd like to know why it's still so thirsty (and I'm hoping that whatever it is gives me a bit more poke).    
    • Car is on factory injectors/z32 maf/ q45 throttle body/ z32 ecu with nistune 
    • Hello all, currently finishing up a rb25 swap into my s14. Having issues with starting, car has spark (confirmed by pulling a plug and watching it spark), has fuel(confirmed by checking pulse/voltage at injectors all spark plugs are soaked in fuel). Car cranks over and pops into the exhaust with a heavy fuel smell but no attempt to start or run, I have torn the timing cover off and triple confirmed timing, turned the CAS in multiple spots both directions, attempted to start with coolant temp and maf unplugged, checked my fuel lines and made sure they weren’t backwards, checked voltage at cas/injectors/coilpacks, made sure all the grounds in the harness are connected and added a few grounding straps (1 from chassis to block, 1 from chassis to head, and 1 from chassis to igniter chip) I am getting stumped here. As a last ditch effort I made a full grounding harness tonight that’s going to run from the battery and add an extra ground from the battery onto the coil pack harness/igniter chip/ intake manifold/ Wiring specialties harness ground/ and alternator. I’m hoping maybe the grounding harness will fix it here but posting here to see if anyone has any other ideas on what else I can check. My fuel pressure is unknown right gauge will be here tomorrow.  IMG_3206.mov
    • yeah I was shocked when I checked my spare OEM on and as below that's how they come from Nissan. (side interesting note new NEO gearbox and replacement park lack the brass bush on the tips and its just all alloy) unsure about damage to the box currently back at 1110 to be pulled down/inspected and selector fork replaced as he built it previously and given the never before seen failure on his billet forks he is replacing it under warranty. He said he has used always OEM the keyway tab without issue for years so it could be an unlucky coincidence. I did talk to him about the sharp corners and stress concentration too. Re: hard shifts i got 7+ years out of the OEM one and the fork itself failed not the keyway. so could be bad luck as I said or an age thing + heat cycles in box and during fabrication of billet?
    • That's some really horrible design with the way it's cut/shaped! Is there much damage to the box that failed in? IE, new fork and you can go again, or is it a total rebuild again? Id be trying to build that piece from scratch, and getting some reliefs added in the corner to hopefully stop breakage, and then swapping boxes ASAP, and then doing the same to the currently good working box. I'm assuming hard shifts have not been friendly to it!
×
×
  • Create New...