Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well pulling into a driveway today at an angle, i noticed that when the rear left became unweighted it free wheeled and the car struggled to get up the driveway ramp...so needs new diff by the looks of it :)

Is there anyone that has had the std Nissan diff reco'd, what can be done...who is running an aftermarket mechanical diff, names brands. I found a Kaaza dealer but its going to be about $2200 fitted for a 2-way diff

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42464-r32-gtst-diffs/
Share on other sites

I was looking at a GTR rear cradle, friend with a 200sx was going to get the brakes whilst i got the diff. Only they need work to fit into a GTST so i didnt bother...

Id much rather a bolt in affair unless someone can point me in the direction of a mechanic that has done this modification/transplant before...as id rather not be paying for someone else to learn on my car and charge me for the process

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42464-r32-gtst-diffs/#findComment-867537
Share on other sites

to run a gtr diff you need to put the internals inside your std casing, then run the gtr driveshafts and hubs to suit the output on the diff. the driveshafts are biggers and run bigger slpines so you need the hubs to suit, all very easy to do once you have the parts

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42464-r32-gtst-diffs/#findComment-867851
Share on other sites

Clint to the rescue!!! So yoy sound as though you have done this?

A question no one has been able to answer for me is... is the GTR hub aluminium...im assuming the GTST is cast iron...so if the GTR is lighter, then i will go to the trouble of getting the hub/driveshafts etc, otherwise ill stick with a GTST diff.

...and mist how much are you asking?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42464-r32-gtst-diffs/#findComment-867929
Share on other sites

Are we talking a weight difference of 50%, 100%? Im waiting for Whitelien to release the Group 4 coilovers for the R32 GTST, if i replace the hub mount then ill be able to run R32 GTR rear shocks (available) and R33 GTST front shocks (available) so seems doable...provided the weight saaving makes it worthwhile. I suppose the added driveshaft strenght shoudl be enough to warrant the change

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42464-r32-gtst-diffs/#findComment-867981
Share on other sites

I had my GTS25t viscous diff done by UAS for $1200 a year or two ago.

Before i had it done i would spin the wheels in the wet constantly and when accelarating through corners it would spin one wheel followed by the other and then heaps of sideways action.

Now i have to do nasty stuff to get the wheels to spin and through corners i can hold the throttle nearly flat without going sideways. Going up a gutter where one wheel is left hanging and the other planted it pulls up without ANY wheel spin. Even after a year or two (i forget how long i have had it) it will still skip the wheels ie lock up when you are turning and you apply some throttle. As far as i know it is a GTS25t diff housing with GTR internals and a clutch pack, call John Penlington and ask him since cant remember the story.

http://www.uniqueautosports.com.au/priceli...rts/r33diff.jpg

http://www.uniqueautosports.com.au/priceli...ylineclutch.htm

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/42464-r32-gtst-diffs/#findComment-869163
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...