Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I need to replace my fuel injector resistor.

I have had a look online at all the usual places I would expect that sell them but haven't had any luck.

I have a R34 GT RB25DET Neo

if anyone knows where I could get one from that would be great.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/425475-fuel-injector-resistor/
Share on other sites

Hey guys,

I need to replace my fuel injector resistor.

I have had a look online at all the usual places I would expect that sell them but haven't had any luck.

I have a R34 GT RB25DET Neo

if anyone knows where I could get one from that would be great.

have you tried ebay? plenty of R34 stuff on there

R34 RB25 NEO's do not have a resistor pack for the injectors. They are high impedance driven straight off the ECU.

You sure you havn't got it confused for something else?

EDIT - As seen in the attached wiring diagram for the NEO engine. There are no resistors for the injectors.

post-45091-0-19315100-1369208865_thumb.jpg

R34 RB25 NEO's do not have a resistor pack for the injectors. They are high impedance driven straight off the ECU.

You sure you havn't got it confused for something else?

EDIT - As seen in the attached wiring diagram for the NEO engine. There are no resistors for the injectors.

Thats what I thought... but what is this?

resistor.jpg

its attached to the bar thats going down etc.

Already seen that one. would rather a new part with warranty.

if you HAVE to have a new part then nissan/amamaya (whoever!)might be your only options but dont expect it to be cheap. . but as pointed out above the 34 has the resistor as part of the ecu

^^ - No there is no resistor period.

I don't know what the part is you've circled. Too small to tell on the phone and I don't know R34 engine bays like the back of my hand.

Why do you think it's a resistor pack and why do you think it needs replacing?

More info needed. What is the car doing / not doing?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...