Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 1 month later...
  • 2 months later...

Stormie,

Probably a bit late but if it helps....I had the same problem. Looked around at a lot of tyres (considered the Yokohama's 'cos they are OEM on the 370Z but couldn't get a reasonable price) but finally went with a newer offering from Falken, the PT722. I had not thought about that brand as my impression was just cheap passenger car crap, but these are actually pretty good tyres. I went up a size so 235/50-18 on the front and 255/45's on the rear and walked out with change from a grand!

And don't get caught up in the bullshit about speed rating - at 180Kph that's it, so why pay through the nose for a Z rated tyre?

The Falken's probably don't have the same level of adhesion as say a Continental tyre, but they do have a lot of feel when pushing the car hard.

For the price not a bad deal.

Because there is more to the speed rating of a tyre than the actual top speed that the car will go.

Its more about tyre construction, and torque handing characteristics of the tyre.

Not to mention voiding your insurance...

In SA (and I think other states are similar) the law says:

"The speed rating of the tyres fitted to a passenger vehicle must be at least 180 km/h ('S') when the tyre placard requires a higher speed rating than 'S', for all other vehicles a speed rating of at least 120 km/h applies ('L')."

So putting S rated tyres on any car won't void the insurance, nor is it illegal. In my opinion, if a tyre is rated to 180 kph (and you can bet there is a decent safety margin - the tyre won't explode at 181 kph), and I'm not using it on a track, I believe that the tyre construction & torque handling characteristics will be more than sufficient for our nanny-state speed limits.

Agree with you GeeDod.

The PT722's are rated V so 240Kph should handle it.

I understand that the higher the rating the better a tyre [should] be, but you would like to think that a modern tyre of this size and profile would provide the expected quality.

My point was more to the significant jump in price when you spec W or Z tyres when realistically most of us wouldn't push quite to the limits where we would notice the difference.

370GT SP has 19in wheels as std

370GT SP has 19in wheels as std

I think wogboy is bang on the money. I was going to say the same, and surprised nobody else has mentioned it. Each and every one of the 4 sp's my mates and I have brought out had 19" wheels.

So either;

1. It's not an sp model.....sorry

2. It's an sp with de-specced wheels.....sorry

3. I'm misinformed....in which case, I'm sorry

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hello, sorry for being late to join the discussion, but my clock just died on me.   Ive tried to look at Michaels digital clock repair.docx and it doesnt work maybe the file has expired.   Please let me know if you can re upload it or take some youtube videos to show us how to get the clock installed? thanks
    • I thought that might be the case, thats what I'll start saving for. Thanks for the info 
    • Ps i found the below forum and it seems to be the same scenario Im dealing with. Going to check my ECU coolant temp wire tomorrow    From NICOclub forum: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Thu Apr 11, 2013 7:23 am I am completely lost on this. Car ran perfectly fine when I parked it at the end of the year. I took the engine out and painted the engine bay, and put a fuel cell with an inline walbro 255 instead of the in tank unit I had last year. After reinstalling everything, the engine floods when the fuel pump primes. if i pull the fuel pump fuse it'll start, and as soon as I put the fuse back in it starts running ridiculously rich. I checked the tps voltage, and its fine. Cleaned the maf as it had some dust from sitting on a shelf all winter, fuel pressure is correct while running, but wont fire until there is less than 5psi in the lines. The fuel lines are run correctly. I have found a few threads with the same problem but no actual explanation of what fixed it, the threads just ended. Any help would be appreciated. Rb25det s1 walbro255 fuel pump nismo fpr holset hx35 turbo fmic 3" exhaust freddy intake manifold q45tb q45 maf   Re: s1 RB25det flooding at start up Fri Apr 12, 2013 5:07 am No, I didn't. I found the problem though. There was a break in one of the ecu coolant temp sensor wires. Once it was repaired it fired right up with no problems. I would have never thought a non working coolant temp sensor would have caused such an issue.
    • Hi sorry late reply I didnt get a chance to take any pics (my mechanics on the other side of the city) but the plugs were fouled from being too rich. I noticed the MAF wasn't genuine, so I replaced it with a genuine green label unit. I also swapped in a different ignitor, but the issue remains. I've narrowed it down a bit now: - If I unplug and reconnect the fuel lines and install fresh spark plugs, the car starts right up and runs perfectly. Took it around the block with no issues - As soon as I shut it off and try to restart, it won't start again - Fuel pressure while cranking is steady around 40 psi, injectors have good spray, return line is clear, and the FPR vacuum is working. It just seems like it's getting flooded after the first start I unplugged coolant sensors to see if its related to ECU flooding but that didnt make a difference. Im thinking its related to this because this issue only started happening after fixing coolant leaks and replacing the bottom part of the stock manifolds coolant pipe. My mechanic took off the inlet to get to get to do these repairs. My mechanics actually just an old mate who's retired now so ill be taking it to a different mechanic who i know has exp with RBs to see if they find anything. If you have any ideas please send em lll give it a try. Ive tried other things like swapping the injectors, fuel rail, different fuel pressure regs, different ignitor, spark plugs, comp test and MAF but the same issue persists.
    • My return flow is custom and puts the return behind the reo, instead of at the bottom. All my core is in the air flow, rather than losing some of it up behind the reo. I realise that the core really acts more as a spiky heatsink than as a constant rate heat exchanger, and that therefore size is important.... but mine fits everything I needed and wanted without having to cut anything, and that's worth something too. And there won't be a hot patch of core up behind the reo after every hit, releasing heat back into the intake air.
×
×
  • Create New...