Jump to content
SAU Community

Id1300

XKLABA

By XKLABA,
in Engines & Forced Induction

 Share

Recommended Posts

XKLABA Grand Master

XKLABA

Posted
Posted

ID have released a all new injector the "ID1300", tech info http://www.injectordynamics.com/ID1300.html


Introducing the ID1300

When we let the cat out of the bag at the PRI show in November, we had no idea we would get the kind of response that we did.

Instead of answering questions about when it will be ready, we are hearing from dealers, and individuals who tell us that their build is on hold until they get their hands on them.

Well guys...we are as excited as you are, but we are also unwilling to release an injector until it is good enough that we can call it the best, without reservation, regardless of the application.

What we are willing to do is use this opportunity to tell you a little bit more about it, and how it came to be.

BoschMotorsport.jpg


The ID1300 is the result of a technical partnership between Injector Dynamics, and Bosch Motorsport This partnership allows us to start with a clean sheet of paper, to develop an injector with characteristics that will make it perform well in a wide variety of performance applications.

The ID1300 Offers

  • Compatibility with all known fuels.
  • Stable operation over a broad pressure range.
  • Low minimum fuel volume, capable of stoichiometric idle in small displacement engines.
  • Smooth controlled response at low pulse widths, allowing accurate linearization using all OEM methods (Ford, GM, Chrysler, Porsche, Subaru, etc.)

Coming soon to a dealer near you...

cut and pasted from there website

wondering if anyone has any ideas or thoughts about them, I put a set on order yesterday and they will be available in 2-3 weeks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428032-id1300/
Share on other sites
Kinks Grand Master

Kinks

Posted
Posted

Interesting, especially given they are short form factor injectors. At low pulse widths they have a noticeable spike in fuel delivery (see linearity deviation curves) but as for how much difference this actually makes.... I'm not sure. It depends on what kind of pulsewidths you're running at idle but it is a different characteristic to their other injectors.

Another excuse to hold off on injector purchases until I hear more about these :unsure:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428032-id1300/#findComment-6914675
Share on other sites
  • 3 weeks later...
Ben C34 Grand Master

Ben C34

Posted
Posted

Was hunting down injectors and i heard that they tested these injectors with a much thinner viscocity compared to that of the fuel we use. If i can find an article i will post.

even if that is the case who cares. injector dynamics have an excellent reputation.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428032-id1300/#findComment-6949956
Share on other sites
XRATED Veteran

XRATED

Posted
Posted

Was hunting down injectors and i heard that they tested these injectors with a much thinner viscocity compared to that of the fuel we use. If i can find an article i will post.

BS....

They're one of the only injector companies that don't use 'test fluid'.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428032-id1300/#findComment-6950049
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
×
×
  • Create New...