Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Really don't have a great understanding of ignition systems. Keen to know more, what's available and how far each with go.

Currently I run a single bosch coil with with an old school electronic distributor on my FJ20. How far will this go before I run out of spark?

What's the next upgrade and when do CDI ignition systems become useful?

G

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428191-ignition-systems-and-limits/
Share on other sites

If you can find a way to mount coils directly on the spark plugs and drive them from an after market brain you escape the 80s era distributor and HT leads woes . The trouble with boosting the std system is the cap and leads dramas with high energy ignitions .

Many people mount a gang of four transistor coils somewhere near the cam cover and run short leads to the plugs , almost as good as coil on plug and much better than a dizzy cap and rotor button .

Good reliable ignition system doubly important on forced induced engines , A .

Yeah I see that's fairly common running a coil and short lead for each plug, especially with a distributor setup like mine.

When can I expect to see limits with my setup and is it related to boost and RPM?

Will the coil need upgrading and what is the big downside with a setup like mine?

Cheers and sorry for all the Q's, just trying to get my head around what I need to know.

G

Yeah I see that's fairly common running a coil and short lead for each plug, especially with a distributor setup like mine.

When can I expect to see limits with my setup and is it related to boost and RPM?

Will the coil need upgrading and what is the big downside with a setup like mine?

Cheers and sorry for all the Q's, just trying to get my head around what I need to know.

G

be related to hp and combustion pressure and a few other things , your asking on the wrong forum going by the answers...Rb30 single cams all have long plug leads, a distributor and a single coil..plenty make 900+ hp on 40+PSI of boost with that with no problems with just a CDI...a cheap analog MSD 6AL or something would probally do the job...and cheap as chips, unless the FJ has some weird probelmsd with its standard setup?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

And the 900hp vl's are all 400m cars. You want drivability and reliability? Do a proper cop or cnp conversion with a good quality igniter of at least 10a and a set of Quality coils. I'm sure there is a conversion for an fj for a signal.

and the 500-700hp+ plus cars are all street cars.....neverminding all types of other motors that have the same setup

that are fine...Talk about overkill, the starter of thread hasn't even listed power or specs...

or depending on computer outputs you could convert to wastespark

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31

@jet_R31 - FJ20, 400hp ATW, 17psi boost, 8500rpm rev limit. Full house engine build with all the trimmings. Looking to make more HP if possible.

Tuner said to try as it is first with single coil etc but wanting to learn more about ignition setups so I know what to expect and what is possible.

Running old Wolf V4 ECU which isn't helping the drivability at the moment so if I can just go ahead and throw it back on the dyno with what I have, then great.

Cheers for the input so far everyone.

The problem is making the spark jump the gap when there is compression plus boost pressure in the chambers , the air density is quite high and if the current can find an easier path to earth it will take it .

Before you even consider the electricals/electronics the rotor turning inside a cap gives issues . Any backlash in the drive gear/jackshaft gear shows up as timing inaccuracy .

The one coil has to fire four plugs instead of one and EVERYTHING hinges of what gets through to the button via the coil lead and carbon brush . Then you have erosion of the four cap contacts and finally the resistance of the four plug leads .

More modern engines use coil on plug or a waste spark system because you need high current to fire todays lean mixtures - and mostly that doesn't even figure in forced induction .

Sadly FJ20s come from the very early 1980s (1981 was 32 yrs ago) when emissions were not as tightly regulated as they are now so the manufacturers didn't have to use super high voltages to fire even turbo engines running 7-10 pounds of boost . Honestly the simplist thing to do would be to run a couple of double ended coils close to the cam cover and four short leads , two coils makes things simller computer and cost wise . If you could crank trigger for the reference pulse you take all the inaccuracies out of the system too .

The whole management and ignition system on an FJ20 needs to go over the shoulder if you want to make serious power because it's all dark ages stuff by todays standards .

It'd kill me to do FJ20s again because there are some pretty good alternatives out there now . By comparison they are lighter more compact and have far better control systems . FJs drive you crazy with two timing chains you can't easily get at that want to rattle and getting at those under bucket valve cap shims is a PITA . Single coil distributor ignition system is just another problem to solve .

People like FJs because they have big strong heavy blocks cranks and heads , fine if you are aiming for 700+ horsepower but way overweight oversize and overkill for 400 horsepower . If serious you're throwing away both manifolds and fabricating better ones . No smarts like variable cam timing either .

I could go one but you et the picture , you need deep pockets and an FJ20 bent to go places with them .

Just my 2c cheers A .

Best bang for buck is swapping to a set of 4 x LS2 coils with a set of custom leads. They have inbuilt ignitors which the wolf will drive fine and they have a brilliant spark. You can pick up a set of 4 oem surplus coils with loom for a bit over $100 off ebay usa

Thanks for the info @Discopotato03. Good to know a little more about the setup. I know the FJ is old school but I've built a tough engine now with every part that could go in the thing and it really does make good power with relatively low boost and plenty more in reserve for when I wind the boost up.

My engine is the same year as the car so it's quite fitting in that respect but I would like to make 450hp at the tyres and call it a day so I'm interested as to what might let me down on my current setup.

@PSI086 - Will search ebay, cheers!

I don't remember you upgrades but Alex used to make his own twin scroll steam pipe manifolds and run an external gate . Expensive but an FP GT3076R HTA should do the job from what I hear .

I would try to run EV14 top feed injectors like IDs and if at all possible E85 fuel because it really pushes detonation thresholds down .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...