Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

see the pic!

History

rb25de neo in a r32 shell

all supporting mods - fuel, ignition is not an issue (wasted spark setup), external gate is off the turbo exh housing at 35mm. air flow meter is a functioning z32 afm. tune is thru a nistune (or chipped std ecu).walbro 255,

turbo is 'unkonwn' but has been reported to me as a t04 variant. but from the graphs, it spools fairly late and should make more power than it is. the worrying part is the odd dip!! does anyone have an explanation or a theory from prev experience?

exhaust is 3" from the catback at least

attached dyno sheet is from the above config

my tuner thinks it could be a cam timing problem or an upset turbo with missing blades etc.

any help or suggestions much appreciated.

post-38082-0-69421700-1373696972_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428551-help-me-with-my-dyno-problem-please/
Share on other sites

Does the car drive like that dip shows??

What has the tuner said?

EDIT. I highly doubt its damaged turbine fins. Cam timing, nope.

Just by looking at the graph, it looks like heaps of ignition timing is being pulled.

thanks for the responses people. The tuner recommended that I check the cam timing. The crank angle sensor - if faulty -should have given off some signals (e.g. vibrations etc) if it was the cause but I will be getting a replcacement to troubleshoot that as well. The tuner tried to smooth out the curve with everything he had at his disposal, added a ton of timing at the dip to try offset potential ignition issues etc. no luck. so we returned everything back to 'standard' so I could troubleshoot the issue without worrying about how it would affect the tune.

Turbo issues is last on my list but with such a good spool and also a carry on on a decent boost curve after the crazy dip, then i doubt the tutbo is the issue here, i am betting on some sort of cam or valve priblem when it hits a resonant frequency.

any another ideas are most welcome, the turbo should be making another 50kw and it is unfortunate that i am missing that power

as far as I know, boost is holding steady at 12psi through the rev range - measured on a prev dyno run which was done on a hub dyno. this time round we didnt have all the sensors hooked up through the wheel dyno so I can't be sure, but I had the dyno operator working the 4th gear pulls and keeping an eye on the electronic boost gauge and didnt notice any sudden drops.

one thing to note is that the z32 afm voltage ramps up to ~3.4v and then holds which indicates some sort of flow problem somewhere - it maxed at 3v last tune, and I found a baffle in my exhaust had caused a restriction. so I replaced the entire exhaust and now making 40kw more, but still something is wrong ...

sounds weird. I would be concerned that the tuner tried adding heaps of timing to counteract the dip, rather than find the root cause.

In your first post you mentioned functioning z32. What do you mean by that? Had it been tuned in another car and behaved normally? Any fault codes present on ecu?

Edited by superben

the tuner added timing to try get rid of the dip but it had no effect. It was done as a diagnostic measure to try eliminate possible reasons for the dip. if even a really advanced spark doesnt make a change, then the problem must be mechanical right?

the z32 afm has not been tested in another car, but it has not shown any abnormal behavior. it has fine resolution up to 160kw initially, and then again up to 200kw on the second tune (around 3v on the first power level, and 3.4v on the second). I would expect if it was the afm, we would be seeing some weird outputs and perhaps even a flow ceiling, but the second tune with an increase in power and hence flow resolution sort of rules that out.. but if that power/torque curve could be a result of a faulty meter, then I can definitely add that to the list of things to diagnose.

no fault codes were found, and my tuner removed all safeguards temporarily to make sure the computer wasnt trying to safemode or anything, for example, fault knock sensors can cause the ecu to pull lots of timing to protect the engine when there is nothing wrong, so we pulled that to be sure it wasnt.

essentially my tuner has eliminated all possible electronic causes out, hes increased the output of the ignition system, there is no missfire and there is plenty of fuel.

current tune now has no ignition dumping to try quick fix the dip, holds a safe AFR throughout the range, so its up to me to try find the cause. if I can fix it, the ecu should be able to relatively safely extrapolate fuel and timing to keep it safe, but i will definitely put it back on the dyno

  • 3 months later...

cleaned out the intake manifold - removed the silly butterfly valve in the neo intake, regapped the plugs and ran a compression test

cyl1-6

200, 120, 170, 160, 170, 190

would the low values on #2 cyl cause these issues?

worth swapping a new short block with 190psi across the board?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...