Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

After speaking to an engine builder and tuner, he's tuned plenty of RB20s with a FFP and has never seen a loss in power. The shorter runner length changes where the torque curve comes in the rev range but doesn't go backwards in power.

He actually had an a31 cefiro with a 20 and greddy FFP almost ready for the dyno and is going to keep me updated with the results. He also says the car becomes alot more responsive with the shorter length of piping and generates less turbo lag.

On the other hand, he said he has seen some after market plenums that have provided a very minimal difference, but still rates them due to the responsiveness, cleaner engine bay and accessibility.

I then went and got a second opinion from a very knowledgeable source who confirmed that there's no way I'll be going backwards.

Fitting it won't be an issue as I have the manifold off currently which is why I decided to research if FFP were better in the first place. Battery was going in the boot anyway and the cars getting a tune because I changed the turbo, exhaust and air flow metre.

We're just trying to help mate... The advise you have got would only make sense if you were building a race car, as the on/off throttle response is definitely better with short runners. However in that case a race engine doesn't need torque down low, as the revs are always kept high.

Also don't confuse the throttle response you gain (due to the short runners and less intercooler piping) with increased turbo spooling. Your turbo will spool slower with short inlet runners as there is less torque down low and hence less exhaust gas to hit the turbo and help it build boost.

All the advice you've had in this thread has been sound. If your car is a daily drive, loosing inlet runner length is just stupid, especially with the RB20. For me if you must go to a front facing plenum, your best two options are to either modify you current plenum to change the throttle body location or buy a Plazmaman style plenum top to retain your lower runners.

Do I know what I'm talking about?

I have a RB25 in my car and swapped the standard plenum to this when I went to a front mount intercooler....

e74315f8.jpg

Any gains I made in throttle response, were rubbish compared to the loss of torque down low and lower spool rate of the turbo. So after 5 years of persisting with this plenum and getting different tunes to try to improve the driveability, I went back to the standard lower runners with a MX performance plenum top.

IMG_0351_zps0e132526.jpg

IMG_0455_zps144e6a90.jpg

That lesson has wasted probably $2000 of my money.... We're not a performance shop trying to convince you to spend money, so we can profit from you.... We're trying to give you advice so you save money!

I am new to this forum, have never driven a Skyline, and my only experience with RB motors is with the RB20DET which I installed in my 1984 RX-7. However, we did modify the intake manifold, not for more performance but to get rid of the clutter on top of the motor. Before we even looked at the various intakes that are shown on the web, my fabricator friend cut up the stock intake and modified it as shown. He cut up an old Porsche 944 intake to get the pieces he wanted for a factory "cast" look.

The main point I want to make is that if you have the skills available, you can do this without changing the runner lengths. Of course the plenum volume has been significantly reduced. Everyone who has driven this thing seems to be impressed with the torque over the speed range.

post-115519-0-97562000-1374198630_thumb.jpg

post-115519-0-58065300-1374198648_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

I like it when people do a god job of cutting up and rebuilding RB plenums like that. But I always end up wondering what the air distribution ends up like. Especially when the volume ends up reduced, not increased.

FWIW, the shape that that plenum has been given stands a good chance of having good distribution. But unless you either flow tested it, or better yet had 6 exhaust pyros installed, you really don't know.

"the shape that that plenum has been given stands a good chance of having good distribution. But unless you either flow tested it, or better yet had 6 exhaust pyros installed, you really don't know."

I agree completely. I retired from Boeing a few years ago after 36 years, B.S. and M.S. in aero engineering ( you may have heard of Boeing - they make those noisy things that occasionally fly over your house). Never worked as an aerodynamicist, but I think I understand the basics of airflow, also commonly known as black magic. But the advantage of a mod like this is you can test drive it, and if you have nothing better to do, dyno test it. I plan to install a wheel speed sensor for my friend's rally computer, and then I can get some pretty accurate horspower and torque curves.

There are other types of "performance mods" that cannot be easily tested. I have several friends who are very experienced, expert aerodynamicists, and the thing we most often laugh about over a beer is this amazing fad that has been going on for more than 40 years, and shows no signs of fading away. I refer of course to this idea of taking a really nice looking car and cluttering up the shape with a wing or spoiler on the back end. Without exception, all of my aero friends agree that 1. It may or may not produce any down force, but you will never know without some very difficult and expensive testing. 2. Only a tiny fraction of the people who do this for street use will ever go fast enough for the wing to make any noticeable difference.

Hope this tirade doesn't get me banned form the forum.

Man, you need to step up your efforts if you want to risk getting banned.

I disagree about the utility of wings. Mine stands a good chance of keeping my boot lid shut if the catch fails while I'm driving around. Plus, it blocks up the screw holes that would be left if I took it off. Very useful things.

I am new to this forum, have never driven a Skyline, and my only experience with RB motors is with the RB20DET which I installed in my 1984 RX-7. However, we did modify the intake manifold, not for more performance but to get rid of the clutter on top of the motor. Before we even looked at the various intakes that are shown on the web, my fabricator friend cut up the stock intake and modified it as shown. He cut up an old Porsche 944 intake to get the pieces he wanted for a factory "cast" look.

The main point I want to make is that if you have the skills available, you can do this without changing the runner lengths. Of course the plenum volume has been significantly reduced. Everyone who has driven this thing seems to be impressed with the torque over the speed range.

i had a good look at those pics and that is automotive art at its best

I am new to this forum, have never driven a Skyline, and my only experience with RB motors is with the RB20DET which I installed in my 1984 RX-7. However, we did modify the intake manifold, not for more performance but to get rid of the clutter on top of the motor. Before we even looked at the various intakes that are shown on the web, my fabricator friend cut up the stock intake and modified it as shown. He cut up an old Porsche 944 intake to get the pieces he wanted for a factory "cast" look.

The main point I want to make is that if you have the skills available, you can do this without changing the runner lengths. Of course the plenum volume has been significantly reduced. Everyone who has driven this thing seems to be impressed with the torque over the speed range.

I highly rate that!

I'm thinking modding the standard plenum is the way to go. Will have a good look at it this weekend and hopefully come up with something.

Edited by Footnah

"I'm thinking modding the standard plenum is the way to go. Will have a good look at it this weekend and hopefully come up with something."

My fabricator friend, Sean O'Brien, has come up with a concept you might want to consider - relatively simple if you have a good aluminum welder who can help you. Just make a plate that bolts to the lower manifold, and then weld on a cast aluminum V8 valve cover. Dozens of styles are available from very plain, no writing or logo to the old style with ribs cast in, some with names like Offenhauser or Edelbrock. The volume is about right, and the length will allow some over hang at the rear so the idle air valve can be hidden underneath if you want a clean look. The throttle body flange can be welded to the front, straight out or angled as required.

I like this RB20 so much I bought another complete R32 front clip when I had the chance, got one with 35,000 miles. Recently I found the car I have been looking for, in nice condition for a very good price. It is an iconic design, the first modern car made in the U.S. after WWII, fairly small, weighs only 2700 pounds, and is a 1948 model. As soon as Sean saw this, he said we have to make in intake that looks like a 50's hot rod part, and then he come up with the idea of using a valve cover. I soon found one with the appropriate name cast in, and had it shipped as-cast with no holes drilled. Photo attached. In case you think this is just another engine swap, be advised the level of insanity goes well beyond that. The complete R32 front structure will be grafted to the firewall and frame rails, so the entire front suspension will be Skyline. I also acquired an R33 rear suspension,which will fit nicely under the rear frame rails. Suffice it to say this will not be your grandfather's Studebaker. Don't mean to hijack this thread - I will start a topic in the Project section as soon as we begin the cutting and welding.

And those who appreciate our "automotive art" may want to look at this: www.cardomain.com/ride/646433

post-115519-0-79788300-1374255798_thumb.jpg

post-115519-0-81242600-1374255845_thumb.jpg

post-115519-0-61678700-1374255903_thumb.jpg

OP - Look for a build thread titled "A boy and his love for his RB20"

The crazy person that created that thread has a sick love for RB20s.

long story short... he was making over 260rwkw.

paid mega dollars for a good brand name FFP.

Had it fitted, cooler piping revised to suit.

back on the dyno and it was worse at everything other than pretty engine bay.

less power, less torque, more lag, more aidz everywhere.

go read it..

dyno results and all.

  • Like 2
  • 2 years later...

Anyone running the Plazmaman plenum? I assume this is just the top bolt on replacement. So I don't have to muck around with the whole manifold etc.

How did you find the fitup? Any advice or things to look out for?

I figure I'd ask in here over creating a new thread. Have the RB20DET in the 32 and mainly looking to reduce the kilometres of pipe work in the engine bay. If i gain a little power then I'll call it a bonus.

Thanks


Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...