Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hello.

Ive found a nice m35 3.5lt rwd

My questions are

What have u guys paid for these b4?

Chain tensioner- how many ks until it needs looking at?

How is the timing adjusted on these? Automatic or manually?

Where can i get a rear boot matt from?

Common issues...

Do these suffer the rear end issues the earlier m35s had?

Anything i need to specifically look at?

I know electrics can be a prick on these,

How common, and what sorts of failures have you come across?

Rear tyre ware bad? And is fuel really 11.5 km/100? (Of course there are many factors but as a general guide?)

If/when i get it, ill budget for this,

Transport (syd to melb -who have we all used)

Travel to and from on a plane

Spark plugs

Engine oil and filter

O2 sensor (what one do i use? 350z?)

Brake fluid - check brakes

Power steer

Flush coolant

Rwc, rego, stamp duty

Insurance

Epic alarm

Cant think of much eles to ask atm. Any info is great!

In terms of mods, i dont need power, torque,looks.

I want comfort and fuel economy.

Is there a nice set of coilovers that are quite comfy?

And is there alot to gain with exhaust mods. (Dont want it louder than it is)

Thanx all

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/428945-vq35de-and-m35-axis-help/
Share on other sites

Please see answers in caps. Sorry, not intending to interwebz shout, just easier for you too see and read ;)

Hello.

Ive found a nice m35 3.5lt rwd

My questions are

What have u guys paid for these b4? WHATEVER ITS WORTH.

Chain tensioner- how many ks until it needs looking at? 250,000+ I'M GUESSING. DEPENDS ON SERVICING

How is the timing adjusted on these? Automatic or manually? AUTOMATICALLY

Where can i get a rear boot matt from? YAJ/STREETER/IM

Common issues...

Do these suffer the rear end issues the earlier m35s had? DEFINE ISSUE PLS

Anything i need to specifically look at? SAME AS ANY OTHER USED CAR

I know electrics can be a prick on these,
How common, and what sorts of failures have you come across? NOT PERSONALLY, BUT ENGINE CAM/CRANK SENSORS, INTERIOR SCREEN

Rear tyre ware bad? And is fuel really 11.5 km/100? (Of course there are many factors but as a general guide?) NO IF ALIGNED CORRECTLY, AND YES, I'D BE STOKED WITH 11.5. MINE DOES SHORT TRIPS AND IS ABOUT 14/100. ON THE FREEWAY A BIT BELOW 10

If/when i get it, ill budget for this,

Transport (syd to melb -who have we all used)
Travel to and from on a plane
Spark plugs
Engine oil and filter
O2 sensor (what one do i use? 350z?) GOING TO REPLACE ALL 4....? MIGHT GET EXPENSIVE....
Brake fluid - check brakes
Power steer
Flush coolant
Rwc, rego, stamp duty
Insurance
Epic alarm


Cant think of much eles to ask atm. Any info is great!

In terms of mods, i dont need power, torque,looks.

I want comfort and fuel economy.

Is there a nice set of coilovers that are quite comfy? READ WHAT YOU WROTE IN THE PREVIOUS 2 LINES - WHY WOULD YOU WANT COILOVERS...?

And is there alot to gain with exhaust mods. (Dont want it louder than it is) NO

Thanx all

In terms of coils, im thinking of shagged out stockies not being any good, due to age, kms, and conditions

M35 issues are rear cradle mainly. Turbo also but this is N/A

The screen is it a pixle issue, or just dies? Easy to come by?

And is the cam sensor a prick to swap or is it not too hard?

In terms of coils, im thinking of shagged out stockies not being any good, due to age, kms, and conditions

Bc coil overs is what most run when they get them. They aren't harsh, but if you can get your hands on bilstein shocks, you'll be pleased. There are a lot of options

M35 issues are rear cradle mainly. Turbo also but this is N/A

Haven't heard of a cracked pm35. Some theory is that hicas increases the chance of crack, but overloading and rough roads stiff springs is a bad combo. It's a simple fix. Weld it if cracked.

The screen is it a pixle issue, or just dies? Easy to come by?

The motor that makes the screen go up and down can be temperamental. Haven't heard of replacement, but wouldn't be simple

And is the cam sensor a prick to swap or is it not too hard?

Easy enough for a confident home mechanic. Back of either head, and in the bell housing.

I need a bloody matt for the back.

The bulldogs claws dont like leather

There are few on importmonster about 60-80 plus postage. If not got to clark rubber and make one out of thin rubber. I think scotty nm35 got his made up if I remeber about a year ago if I remember correctly.

Keep us posted with how you go Chef.

I'm interested too, the simplicity of PNM35's really appeals to me as I don't drive in snow/icy conditions. Non turbo is a big win also given how "one of a kind" the NM35 turbos are.

Without driving one it's hard to know how they are power wise - reading the specs a bit more than the NM35's from factory but obviously a lot easier to pull more out of a NM35 without more major modifications (bolt ons, mainly).

My other concern is fuel economy. I used to get excellent economy out of my NM35 - just over 10L/100km around town assuming I was wearing my sensible pants and as low as 8L-9L/100km on the highway without air cond.

I think if I bought a PNM35 I'd be organising a remap for it so I'd be hoping that I would be able to get those sort of economy figures out of one.

Keep us posted with how you go Chef.

I'm interested too, the simplicity of PNM35's really appeals to me as I don't drive in snow/icy conditions. Non turbo is a big win also given how "one of a kind" the NM35 turbos are.

Without driving one it's hard to know how they are power wise - reading the specs a bit more than the NM35's from factory but obviously a lot easier to pull more out of a NM35 without more major modifications (bolt ons, mainly).

My other concern is fuel economy. I used to get excellent economy out of my NM35 - just over 10L/100km around town assuming I was wearing my sensible pants and as low as 8L-9L/100km on the highway without air cond.

I think if I bought a PNM35 I'd be organising a remap for it so I'd be hoping that I would be able to get those sort of economy figures out of one.

:/ remap for fuel economy? Isn't it expensive just to do a remap for fuel economy? and you might not get what you'd be hoping for, wouldn't it be cheaper to get it gas converted?

I'm a 4th year apprentice, I also have another job, completely independent. I manage 250km to 270km for half a tank on average and the car is my daily, it's hell unpractical as a daily, but I love the car to bits reason being it offers soo much and for me they outweigh the cost of running the thing and I'm not just talking fuel economy. If I wanted a car that was big, fuel economic and would save more money compared to a PNM35 I'd be looking at probably a diesel wagon or an SV6 or something...

You'd probably save more by spending 100$ a week at Coles or Woolies and use the fuel discount rather than a remap or get another NM35 as the savings of fuel you get over a year you can budget for tubz? Then next year with the same savings you can get a couple AFMs as spares.

Not trying to talk you out of PNM35's but one thing they ain't is economic :P.

But on to the mechanical issues, the only issue I've had was a split CV boot, the rear diff was weeping but that was just a blocked breather I was told, and I've replaced the radiator. The car has almost done 144k kms and I've probably put about 10k kms on myself.

Edited by M35woah

Engines have become a lot more efficient, these things run wideband o2 correction... But it's still 3.5L in a 2 ton car...

Liquid gas conversion would be the go like Matt said.


:/ remap for fuel economy?

I'd be looking at probably a diesel wagon or an SV6 or something...

SV6 isn't going to be any better on fuel, nor is the NM35. Even the missus A4 1.8t only gets around 9L/hundred on the hwy.

My other concern is fuel economy. I used to get excellent economy out of my NM35 - just over 10L/100km around town assuming I was wearing my sensible pants and as low as 8L-9L/100km on the highway without air cond.

I think if I bought a PNM35 I'd be organising a remap for it so I'd be hoping that I would be able to get those sort of economy figures out of one.

SV6 isn't going to be any better on fuel, nor is the NM35. Even the missus A4 1.8t only gets around 9L/hundred on the hwy.

Just going on what Jasevr4 has stated what he got previously, and the SV6 is just going on redbook figures.

The figures that Jase stated put the PNM35 to shame, there is no way I can do 10L/100km around town unless freeway town.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...