Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

thanks for this mode:) its working i jast change graunding place :laugh: now in second gear shows -8 PSI:) thanks again

Edited by guricha

hey all,

the idea of the switch is a good idea to control when you want highboost or when u want two stage boost.

ANYONE got pics of their switch, or installation of the switch that they could post up.

assuming you cut the black wire and ground it, without using a switch.

just a quick question?

is this mod reversible? like if u want the two stage boost again without using a switch. further down the track could u reattach/solder the black wire through its original path again? or is stuffed once cut?

hopefully someone can help?

Cheers :laugh:

Edited by R33LIN
hey all,

the idea of the switch is a good idea to control when you want highboost or when u want two stage boost.

ANYONE got pics of their switch, or installation of the switch that they could post up.

assuming you cut the black wire and ground it, without using a switch.

just a quick question?

is this mod reversible? like if u want the two stage boost again without using a switch. further down the track could u reattach/solder the black wire through its original path again? or is stuffed once cut?

hopefully someone can help?

Cheers :laugh:

I would imagine that you could solder the wire again, I just bought a 4 buck switch from supercheap, and mounted it in the dash I drilled a hole in the removable pushout panel thing, its just a simple on off switch,

I cbf running the wire through the firewall so i ran it next to the loom that follows the strut and continues to the wiper motor, then into the gaurd and the door, i know crap way of doing it but it works, BTW heres a pic or two! :)

post-33491-1170834217.jpg

post-33491-1170834277.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

Just did this on my R34 this afternoon, it works..it's now hitting 8psi at about 2,500rpm.

Will be hooking up a switch next weekend to switch between high boost & low/hi boost.

Also, in the pic it looks like the black wire to the plug is still connected but it's not - it's just tucked back into the black surround.

Question:When I put on a full turbo back 3 inch exhaust this will be rendered unnecessary, correct?

post-26304-1171789765.jpg

Edited by so_tred

Hi all. Is there anyone from sydney who has done this mod that wouldnt mind helpingme out. i live in the liverpool area and dont feel confident enough to start cutting wires. let me know.....there will be an ice cold six pack in it.

Question:When I put on a full turbo back 3 inch exhaust this will be rendered unnecessary, correct?

No. The only time it will be unnecessary is when you have some form of boost controller that will be bypassing the stock solenoid.

Hi all. Is there anyone from sydney who has done this mod that wouldnt mind helpingme out. i live in the liverpool area and dont feel confident enough to start cutting wires. let me know.....there will be an ice cold six pack in it.

drive to Turramurra and ill do it for you :(

Im outta switches though...

Hi all. Is there anyone from sydney who has done this mod that wouldnt mind helpingme out. i live in the liverpool area and dont feel confident enough to start cutting wires. let me know.....there will be an ice cold six pack in it.

Seriously man... its the most simple job ever...

I just shoved a cotter pin down the back of the plug.. and grounded it to the airbox.. I can remove the mod within seconds and no cutting wires at all

No. The only time it will be unnecessary is when you have some form of boost controller that will be bypassing the stock solenoid.

I thought if the boost solenoid was left standard and I added a full exhaust which usually will up the boost by 2psi then the solenoid would be made obsolete?

no, instead of being 5psi/7psi (on an R33, not sure if its the same boost on R34's?) it will then be 7psi/9psi

I hoped it would be like that :P

So it's been tried & proven to be that way?

As far as im aware.. my exhaust is only catback.. However im running around 9.5 PSI... Blitz Turbo timer tell me 0.71 kg/cm2 (which equals 9.5psi) and just installed a boost gauge.. it also reads just under 10 psi

Is that possible with only catback?

Before the mod it was 7/9psi

hey i did this on my 33gtst and its poping and crap well by the way its a S1 4 speed auto , 600x300x75 intercooler and a 3.5inch stainless from cat back and i did this thing by cut the black wire and the black wire onto the car body and the black wire from the computer taped to block it . now took it up the street and it will get to 5 psi then it will just back fire and pop and jump or what ever eles .. then i put it all back to normal then it was fine . i wanted to do this thing , but can anyone tell me how to solve this problem . or anyone from lismore or ballina . cheers, adam

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...