Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Howdy folks,

Got the engine fiasco sorted but now it's the suspension. The ride is fine but occasionally when there's couple of bumps, it upsets the suspension a bit and it wanders left and right. It feels as if it doesn't want to hold itself still. Another problem I am having right now is I need to point towards the left in order to go straight. Is this simply an alignment issue or it's deeper than that?

(afterall, the coilovers were swapped out during compliance then put it back on so alignment settings may have moved..)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/43068-r33-gtr-wanders-everywhere/
Share on other sites

3rd gear at about 7,000rpm in a BCNR33 with 345rwkW and stock (non-V) suspension and 245/45R17 A032R tyres the car does a weird feeling that the car was sort of walking around at the rear, almost like it was being rotated on its longitudinal axis. It felt bizarre... I don't know if it was slight wheelspin or what it was... But it was very strange.

my car does exactly the same thing after putting 7.5s on the front + allignment. they buggered the allignment up shit creek the first time by lettin some young inexperienced guy do it and then supposedly straighnted it out the next day when i brought it back but now it does exactly the same thing as urs does...wanders around on bumpy roads and strays off to the left.

also one time in the wet when turning right at about 70 in a big intersection lost the front end for a split sec and had to catch it...scary stuff

takin it to a specialist tomorrow.....aint goin back to that place again!!

oh yeah..i dont think its the swaybars as i had them on before the allighnment and the car was driving sweet ass before those bastards got their hands on it. they also put a nice deep groove right around the 2 rims when swappin tyres over.........arrrhhhh!!!not happy jan!!

Tramlining seems a fairly standard problem with GTR's, mine does it a bit with 245's all round...

Gojira, my gtr does the same thing you are talking about, driven hard near the top of 3rd or 4th the car will squirm once then track straight again. I'm thinking it's maybe the hicas as it's a weird feeling and only does it under heavy power, ie if I'm doing 120kph cruising no probs, but if I nail it in 3rd doing say 90 it'll squirm...

Weird.. might have to by a hicas lock kit to see if it fixes it..

Brett

Had/have a similar problem with my 32 gtr, i took it to get an alignment and basically paid money for nothing cause when i drove it it was as bad if not worse than before, got a mechanic to check the whole front end and it turns out i have flogged out inner upper control arm bushes, i'll let you know next week after i fit whitline kits to the front and rear.

Hi guys, I always start at the uper control arm bushes on Skylines (all models). They wear out, it is as simple as that. Adding some positive caster (as much as you can) really helps with the tramlining, a small amount (not too much) of negative camber helps as well.

If it pulls to the left, I add a little positive caster to the left hand front wheel, about 0.5 degrees more than the right usually works a charm. Don't ignore the rear wheel alignment, if it is out, it can have a similar effect.

I would never suggest going to your local tyre service for a suspension check/alignment on a Skyline, it's a waste of time and money. A suspension specialist is the go.

well....just came back from Traction tyres (recommened by sydkid....legend:D) as its closer to me and they confirmed that my castors abit out on the front left...my right rear is toed in abit more than the left rear but nothing to major. diagnosis is to change the castor bushes to adjustable ones to straighten things out and get rid of the tramlining. very pleased with the quality of service and advice...also helps to see 2 race cars being worked on too...hehe.

i can now sleep easier knowing nothings bent:D

question......i was pondering just buying new aftermarket adjustable castor rods instead of replacing the bushes cause i plan it to take it to the tracks. one of the guys at TT raised issues about some actually being weaker than originals and break depending on their designs. is it worth it or should i just make do with the adjustable bushes?? and which brands should i be lookin if i do??

cheers

I have replaced nearly everything there is to replace with adjustable stuff on the suspension on my 33 GTR and added a little more caster and sorted the camber front and rear. With 265s all round I have yet to experience any noticeable tramlining, it now drives nicer than any other car I have experienced. The mini tramlines heaps more with its big 165s all round!

jlnewton: just a question, when you mean "replaced nearly everything there is to replace" do you really mean every single tid bit of the suspension or just a selected few? I'm sorta looking at the Whiteline handling pack to go with my Arogosta (sp?) coilovers with the Eibach springs.

I put these in a month or so ago now:-

APEXi T-max coilovers - Reconditioned

Replaced springs with king spring items (F - 400lbs, R - 225lbs)

Cusco Adj caster rod

Cusco adj rear upper camber arm

Whiteline front adj camber bush.

Whiteline Pineapples.

Whiteline adj sway bars should be in, in about 2 weeks. And also may try differnt spring rates (F - 450lbs, R - 300lbs) just to see the effect it has. Trying to find the best compromise on the road/track, comfort/handling front.

Height is 355mm from centre of wheel to arch all round

FR :- camber = -1.5deg caster = +5.0/5.5deg Toe = 0.0mm

R :- camber = -1.0deg Toe = +1.5mm total

Basically the whiteline suggest touring settings.

Rides real nice at the moment on soft, absorbs all the bumps but still firm. Turn the knob to hard and it shakes your teeth out. I am real happy with the result so far. The GTST started to tramline real bad when the tyres where approaching the replacement stage, so I expect the GTR to do the same. At the moment its fine though on the new 265 Yoko ES100s.

Dairyboy,

I know its only a long shot, but have you checked the height setting of each coilover. I remember reading an article in a zoom mag a while ago where they actually weighed each corner to get the correct height. I recall they were quite surprised by the differences in each corner. But it might be nothing to do with your problem.

RE: the orignal thread, has the car been damaged?

It is amazing after an accident what will happen to the suspension. Something that looks arrow striaght could be really far out of alignment, even after a small gutter hit.

Get the car on a proper laser alignment machine that measures castor, camber & toe and you should be able to work out the problem.

From there it is a matter of replacing the damaged component or replacing the component needed to get thte desired result i.e not enough castor on D/S front from gutter hit, either replace the bent castor rod (which looks straight) or buy some adjustables and get them dialed in to suit.

A skyline GTR should not tramline heaps if it is setup properly even with 265 tyres all round.

TG

Alignment will tell if something is out... Its definitely worth it.

Another good idea is to put the car up on a hoist and actually measure distance between suspension components. That way you can tell if you car has bent suspension or even worse bent body components, like chassis rails.

I have even heard of the front cradle that holds the engine can sometimes be out if it has not been bolted in correctly. This directly effects the suspension as the castor rods are directly attached to it. Only a few mm of difference can help here. If the engine has been out then this is a possiblity. Its only a five minute job to loosen the cradle nuts and move the cradle with a bar then re-tighten once aligned.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Well, that's kinda the point. The calipers might interfere with the inside of the barrels 16" rims are only about 14" inside the barrels, which is ~350mm, and 334mm rotors only leave about 8mm outboard for the caliper before you get to 350, And.... that;s not gunna be enough. If the rims have a larger ID than that, you might sneak it in. I'd be putting a measuring stick inside the wheel and eyeballing the extra required for the caliper outboard of the rotor before committing to bolting it all on.
    • OK, so again it has been a bit of a break but it was around researching what had been done since I didn't have access to Neil's records and not everything is obvious without pulling stuff apart. Happily the guy who assembled the engine had kept reasonable records, so we now know the final spec is: Bottom end: Standard block and crank Ross 86.5mm forgies, 9:1 compression Spool forged rods Standard main bolts Oil pump Spool billet gears in standard housing Aeroflow extended and baffled sump Head Freshly rebuilt standard head with new 80lb valve springs Mild porting/port match Head oil feed restrictor VCT disabled Tighe 805C reground cams (255 duration, 8.93 lift)  Adjustable cam gears on inlet/exhaust Standard head bolts, gasket not confirmed but assumed MLS External 555cc Nismo injectors Z32 AFM Bosch 023 Intank fuel pump Garret 2871 (factory housings and manifold) Hypertune FFP plenum with standard throttle   Time to book in a trip to Unigroup
    • I forgot about my shiny new plates!
    • Well, apparently they do fit, however this wont be a problem if not because the car will be stationary while i do the suspension work. I was just going to use the 16's to roll the old girl around if I needed to. I just need to get the E90 back on the road first. Yes! I'm a believer! 🙌 So, I contacted them because the site kinda sucks and I was really confused about what I'd need. They put together a package for me and because I was spraying all the seat surfaces and not doing spot fixes I decided not to send them a headrest to colour match, I just used their colour on file (and it was spot on).  I got some heavy duty cleaner, 1L of colour, a small bottle of dye hardener and a small bottle of the dye top coat. I also got a spray gun as I needed a larger nozzle than the gun I had and it was only $40 extra. From memory the total was ~$450 ish. Its not cheap but the result is awesome. They did add repair bits and pieces to the quote originally and the cost came down significantly when I said I didn't need any repair products. I did it over a weekend. The only issues I had were my own; I forgot to mix the hardener into the dye two coats but I had enough dye for 2 more coats with the hardener. I also just used up all the dye because why not and i rushed the last coat which gave me some runs. Thankfully the runs are under the headrests. The gun pattern wasn't great, very round and would have been better if it was a line. It made it a little tricky to get consistent coverage and I think having done the extra coats probably helped conceal any coverage issues. I contacted them again a few months later so I could get our X5 done (who the f**k thought white leather was a good idea for a family car?!) and they said they had some training to do in Sydney and I could get a reduced rate on the leather fix in the X5 if I let them demo their product on our car. So I agreed. When I took Bec in the E39 to pick it up, I showed them the job I'd done in my car and they were all (students included) really impressed. Note that they said the runs I created could be fixed easily at the time with a brush or an air compressor gun. So, now with the two cars done I can absolutely recommend Colourlock.  I'll take pics of both interiors and create a new thread.
    • Power is fed to the ECU when the ignition switch is switched to IGN, at terminal 58. That same wire also connects to the ECCS relay to provide both the coil power and the contact side. When the ECU sees power at 58 it switches 16 to earth, which pulls the ECCS relay on, which feeds main power into the ECU and also to a bunch of other things. None of this is directly involved in the fuel pump - it just has to happen first. The ECU will pull terminal 18 to earth when it wants the fuel pump to run. This allows the fuel pump relay to pull in, which switches power on into the rest of the fuel pump control equipment. The fuel pump control regulator is controlled from terminal 104 on the ECU and is switched high or low depending on whether the ECU thinks the pump needs to run high or low. (I don't know which way around that is, and it really doesn't matter right now). The fuel pump control reg is really just a resistor that controls how the power through the pump goes to earth. Either straight to earth, or via the resistor. This part doesn't matter much to us today. The power to the fuel pump relay comes from one of the switched wires from the IGN switch and fusebox that is not shown off to the left of this page. That power runs the fuel pump relay coil and a number of other engine peripherals. Those peripherals don't really matter. All that matters is that there should be power available at the relay when the key is in the right position. At least - I think it's switched. If it's not switched, then power will be there all the time. Either way, if you don't have power there when you need it (ie, key on) then it won't work. The input-output switching side of the relay gains its power from a line similar (but not the same as) the one that feeds the ECU. SO I presume that is switched. Again, if there is not power there when you need it, then you have to look upstream. And... the upshot of all that? There is no "ground" at the fuel pump relay. Where you say: and say that pin 1 Black/Pink is ground, that is not true. The ECU trigger is AF73, is black/pink, and is the "ground". When the ECU says it is. The Blue/White wire is the "constant" 12V to power the relay's coil. And when I say "constant", I mean it may well only be on when the key is on. As I said above. So, when the ECU says not to be running the pump (which is any time after about 3s of switching on, with no crank signal or engine speed yet), then you should see 12V at both 1 and 2. Because the 12V will be all the way up to the ECU terminal 18, waiting to be switched to ground. When the ECU switches the fuel pump on, then AF73 should go to ~0V, having been switched to ground and the voltage drop now occurring over the relay coil. 3 & 5 are easy. 5 is the other "constant" 12V, that may or may not be constant but will very much want to be there when the key is on. Same as above. 3 goes to the pump. There should never be 12V visible at 3 unless the relay is pulled in. As to where the immobiliser might have been spliced into all this.... It will either have to be on wire AF70 or AF71, whichever is most accessible near the alarm. Given that all those wires run from the engine bay fusebox or the ECU, via the driver's area to the rear of the car, it could really be either. AF70 will be the same colour from the appropriate fuse all the way to the pump. If it has been cut and is dangling, you should be able to see that  in that area somewhere. Same with AF71.   You really should be able to force the pump to run. Just jump 12V onto AF72 and it should go. That will prove that the pump itself is willing to go along with you when you sort out the upstream. You really should be able to force the fuel pump relay on. Just short AF73 to earth when the key is on. If the pump runs, then the relay is fine, and all the power up to both inputs on the relay is fine. If it doesn't run (and given that you checked the relay itself actually works) then one or both of AF70 and AF71 are not bringing power to the game.
×
×
  • Create New...