Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys first post for me,im new to gtr's.I have just recently bought a r33 gtr from Adam at JEM.It currently makes 343kws at the wheels on 20psi.

My plan is to switch it over to United e85 with an end goal of 400kws at the wheels.IT has a precision 6266 turbo and other supporting mods.At the moment it has an 044 intank,i was thinking of replacing this with a walbro e85 450l/ph pump and replacing 750cc injectors with some bosch id1000s.

I have asked Adam at jem and he said in theory this pump should do the job,but has not personally done it.

Your thoughts guys or experiences would be great.I will directly wired this off the battery thru a relay to get good volts to the pump.I have used the search function,but could not find an answer.

From the last page of the RB26 dyno results thread:

forged bottom end

stock cams and valve springs

metal head gasket with ARP head studs

precision 6266 0.84 T4 divided rear

3.5" dump/cat back

GFB EX50 50mm external gate

1200cc injectors with walbro e85 pump

power fc d-jetro

409rwkw @ 26psi on Caltex eflex E70, at the limit of stock cams and injectors

At 13.5v and 40 psi rail pressure it advertises 430l/ph and on 12v at 40 psi it flows 375l/ph.I plan on running a direct feed to get near 13.5 volts.So at 40psi pressure should outflow 2x 044s.I was toying with the idea of the bosch id2200cc injs.Thanks guys

Not sure on that one piggaz,i think I will go straight with the bosch id 2200cc or similar brand.Car has haltech platinum pro plug-in,should handle the big injectors ok.Thanks guys.

Have a gander at my attachment.

I wrote a pretty simple spreadsheet for calculating and comparing different fuel systems for my car. Obviously it's to suit my setup but could be easily tweaked.

I have highlighted all of the cells you need to update then see sheet 2 and graph's it all out.

IE set the highlighted cell to your desired base fuel pressure. write out your hp and boost based off a close dyno sheet. in my case when it was tuned for bp98. and then fill in the injector flows and corresponding pressures.

with this info it tells me that my injectors are too small for me to convert over to E85 and keep my same HP. unless I either run a 70PSI base pressure or go about an 80% duty.

fuel calcs.zip

thanks ss8 gohan,will go with the e85 450l/ph pump.Still tossing up on the injectors.Tuner thinks 1000cc ids will do,but a lot of guys on here think the 2000cc are the go.Most suppliers will warrant the 1000cc with e85 but not the 2000cc,Will do some more research.Thanks all,for ideas and tips.

  • 3 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to !
    • As I've said elsewhere, I am using the stock intercooler piping path in the engine bay, and a return flow cooler, and making ~250 rwkW (without any effort put into trying to turn it up past there just yet) and expect to be able to make some more, and frankly, I would be perfectly happy with 260-270rwKW. This is peak road Skyline usability territory. You go past there and, sure, the car will snap necks more when it's on boost, but it will also break shit all the time, cost a (even larger) fortune in tyres, etc etc. Anyway, I also do not like the over-the-fan pipe path, and you don't have to do it.
    • I see, honestly I’m not too fussed about the looks. The only reason to go plenum is to make the piping easier instead of the classic over the rad etc. 
    • Not easy to quantify wrt something like how many fractions of a second slower it would be over 0-100. But given that a 250-300rwkW car is able to do that launch sprint in 5-6 sec (and faster with appropriate tyres, and surface)..... giving up as much as a second would feel like torture. A ~450HP capable turbo is not going to make lots of boost in the 2000-3000 rpm range. So, whilst with some boost on hand it will be faster accelerating in that rev range than your engine currently is NA, it will not feel like a fast car until the boost is solidly in. You know what your car feels like right now when you open it up at 2000rpm. if you've ever been in an actual fast car, you will appreciate that the NARB25 is.... not exciting. Well, add some boost and it will be better. But shorten the intake runners and it might not be better at all. It might come out better, but it could end up feeling the same. For me, it's not the 0-X km/h sprints that matter. It is easy to fry the tyres with anything over 200 rwkW. You can't use all the power available in 1st and 2nd anyway, you have to modulate the throttle. What matters is how the car reacts when you're driving in traffic in 4th or 5th and have maybe 2000 rpm on board, and you want/need to add some speed quickly, and don't have time for the downshift. It won't make boost, it will be all NA (at the speeds we're talking about - remember how fast you're going at 2000 in 4th! and don't plan on breaking the limit by too much.) So giving away NA torque is not what I would consider practical for a street car. And retaining that NA torque builds boost faster which makes the car faster. The flashy plenum is not actually better, unless you're looking at a track car where you can keep it on the boil all the time.  
    • So how much difference does it make you think? Like 1 second in the 0-100?  I was have smaller turbo so hopefully that spools quick GTX2871.  currently it’s NA so you can imagine pretty slow, but I do want fast accusation a little as there’s not many places I’ll be driving where I go over 80 even near me. So 0-60 and 0-80 targets   
×
×
  • Create New...