Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys I have been on this page for a little while but only used it for a reference sort of thing. But now I thought I would try my luck asking a question. I recently got my 33 gtst tuned and it has a flat spot in power curve. I basically just want to see if someone has had a similar problem and what they did to resolve it.


Mods are.

•Haltech platinum pro plugin.

•Hypergear atr43g3 on standard exh mani

•Nismo 740cc injectors

•Ebay intercooler kit

•3" bellmouth single piece dump pipe to 3" delete pipe and steps up to 4" before rear muffler.

•Standard plenum

•3" intake to pod filter and 2.5" cooler piping.

•Tomei fpr


Car makes 255.7rwkw on 20psi with bp98 which seems low compared to other peoples results.


Have checked for boost leaks with none found.

Tuner said that he thinks restriction is exhaust manifold but have heard of standard ones still getting 300kw etc.


Has anyone had something similar?


Regards Spencer

post-104841-0-31871700-1384330400_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/434952-flat-spot-in-power-curve/
Share on other sites

Na I didnt drop the exhaust because I was pretty confident it wasn't a restriction at the time. Might do it once I get it back on the dyno after I change induction pipe to 4" and maybe see if there is a pressure drop through intercooler

I have seen over 400kw through a 3 inch intake too, infact the 430kw 33 had a Z32 afm... No point going bigger than the AFM unless you ditch it and go MAP sensor.

Just looking at the graph, it seems you are missing a chunk of boost in the midrange, did you get a boost plot by chance?

That is a whack result. Scottynm35 has seen huge power through stock mani, Not sure what your issue is, many things to check but I hope you can get it sorted out.

E85 is a hell of a thing. Can't compare a car which is tuned on petrol with one which is tuned on ethanol - the nastiness which is the stock manifold gets covered up a bit if using a very knock resistant fuel.

E85 coveres up 200kw... Yeh right. :P

Anyway, 250 isn't it's limit surely, not to mention, where is his midrange? It either has no boost in the midrange, or no timing, probably due to a big restriction somewhere. Cam timing?

Did I mention my closed 1.5 inch Varex exhaust makes more than 250? ;)

I wasn't referring to the 250kw thing specifically - so much as how ridiculous comparing a big turbo high octane combination with a small turbo pump gas setup... there is an issue there, but mentioning a 400+kw ethanol setup is probably not being helpful for perspective.

I wasn't referring to the 250kw thing specifically - so much as how ridiculous comparing a big turbo high octane combination with a small turbo pump gas setup... there is an issue there, but mentioning a 400+kw ethanol setup is probably not being helpful for perspective.

It proves the standard manifold can flow a lot more than the power he is making. Many people (myself included) have made much more than 250kw through standard manifolds on 98. Why argue against scottys valid point that in this case manifold flow is not the restriction?

It proves the standard manifold can flow a lot more than the power he is making. Many people (myself included) have made much more than 250kw through standard manifolds on 98. Why argue against scottys valid point that in this case manifold flow is not the restriction?

Because I was bored at home with manflu and brain wasn't working very well - my bad! Forgot I even posted that. There is clearly an issue that isn't the exhaust manifold causing it.

post-104841-0-53226600-1384589445_thumb.jpgI changed my induction pipe to solid 4 inch yesterday instead of it stepping down to 3 inch. Tuner is going to print me out a picture of boost plot so will show that when I get it. Also going to change actuator to 14psi and run an eboost street to have high and low boost and get retuned.

Here is a photo of my timing map

That timing map is pretty average. Looks like a huge reduction at around 5krpm-20psi drops like 3-5deg then back up at 6k. I'd imagine that'd feel pretty flat through there.

Did the tuner say anything about the engine wanting to knock?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...