Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've looked through the rb26 thread but can't find much. I have a new Borg Warner s300 . The measurements as follows. Compressor inducer 59 mm exducer 84mm . Turbine inducer 74mm exducer 64mm. What will this be like on a 2.8 stroker? Currently running dash 10s on a 2.6. Any help greatly appreciated.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/437060-is-this-turbo-suitable-for-rb26/
Share on other sites

I've looked through the rb26 thread but can't find much. I have a new Borg Warner s300 . The measurements as follows. Compressor inducer 59 mm exducer 84mm . Turbine inducer 74mm exducer 64mm. What will this be like on a 2.8 stroker? Currently running dash 10s on a 2.6. Any help greatly appreciated.

Here's an example:

http://www.trademe.co.nz/Browse/Listing.aspx?id=585599046

-10's on a high comp 2.8 and a 8375 on a 8.5:1 on a 2.6, having driven both, I'd take the single on a 2.6. That, on a high comp with head work on a 2.8 would be a totally different kettle on fish.

-10's on a 2.6 would suck the hiney, so, so hard!

  • Like 1

Not sure why the F#CK!! I cant paste links here,

Search GTR_JOEY 83/75 into google, my results are there

The turbo is actually pretty boss, I had great results from it.. you will be pushing it hard to get to 450 on a genuine dyno, you will need reasonable head work and E85

as you will see I made 420rwkw with minimal head work and stockish compression on E85

post a pic of the turbo

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Nope, I don't like the look of ND RF, or any ND really, I don't like their faces or arses, why, because of their "modern" lines, the NC, whilst "modernish" has a more rounded shape that I like Well, that's how my overly judgemental eyes see it anyway  
    • Should be more than fine, especially the overall fuel pressure would never exceed 3.5bar (assuming that thing never gets more than 0.5bar of boost in stock form). According to the chart, it's 11amps.
    • I definitely know the first rule here, look first, ask second. I've seen many people get roasted 😂 I found a few diagrams for the RB, but I'm yet to come across one for the VQ. From what I have read, the pump gets the +12v along with the FPCM, and it's the negative wire that gets passed through the resistor to regulate the voltage. So I assume I can just ground the negative wire at the pump to eliminate the FPCM control. But I really wanted to see the VQ circuit diagram first to make sure I understood it correctly. Once the new pump is in I'll do some testing to see how it behaves, and in the meantime, I'll keep looking for a wiring diagram. Thanks for your help mate, your time is greatly appreciated.    
    • Maybe? I have the Supercheap ToolPro low thingo. It has a somewhat smaller diameter lifting "bowl" than you would expect on a workshop grade trolley jack, and a split rubber pad to suit that diameter. It clears the "N1" style skirts I have. Probably wouldn't if the jack's bowl and a suitably larger rubber block were in use. Having said that though.....you only need the rubber block to exist on the inner side of the pinchweld, so could carve away any rubber that fouled the skirt, leaving some there for "insurance" </simples>
    • I used to do that (sills with rubber jack block).. ... then I got side skirts, and there's no way for the jack to actually work there, the jack pad itself on the jack is too big. Is the answer to use a... smaller (?) jack? Hmmm.
×
×
  • Create New...