Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

why you knocking on engineers for? =(

Lol, only the kind that need to keep telling everyone that they are...

I don't think anyone would be crazy enough to mess with a chemical engineer Alvin.

QFT. :woot:

Pull your head in mate. I'm interested in trying to find a solution to your pipe dream. Your talking with Scotty, who if there isn't something he doesn't know about vq turbos, it's not worth knowing, and I myself have done a VQ35 turbo into an awd stagea.

The turbo is only a small part of an overall kit, so why not consider using the pipe work and other parts. What turbo are you intending to put on it? Single or twins? Gt30, 35, 42? Re you going to buy an off the shelf item, or modify it yourself? That constricts the location and packaging.

Are you building a motor? The stock vq35 has notable flaws when using forced induction. But I'm sure you can engineer your way around that...

holset VGT's are fairly cheap, some manifolds etc may need an engine out sonario (scotty tells me), if there could be another approach lets say we keep the standard manifolds and try an alternate location for the turbo, we agree on increased pipe length for driver and discharge medium, but if a VGT turbo is an option this will decrease the loss,

Weak points of the VQ35 is the conrods? from what i could find they give out arround the 500hp mark.

If the motor is kept standard a 300 rwkw mark should be a reasonable target to aim for...?

Plenty of VQ35's blow at much less, some last though. Perhaps the difference between a tune, and a good tune...

Just remember when talking US power figures, ours are often much lower.

Plenty of VQ35's blow at much less, some last though. Perhaps the difference between a tune, and a good tune...

Just remember when talking US power figures, ours are often much lower.

The ones that blow at lower power figures, do you know what lets go?

Yup, it's rods, and the overall HP isn't that much of deal. It's about the torque. Because you can have full boost at 2200 ( my experience) the loads through the rods at slow engine speeds is the issue. Therefore steps have to be taken to reduce torque.

When comparing with US figures I found a lot of bullshit. I was massively short with my results, using the same boost, afm volts, afr, and ignition timing as other cars. I didn't want to push my set up as it was a daily car.

Thanks Guys, I see the issues....

In saying that i have made perliminary drawings and have sent them to STS, Garrett gearhead.. they are both showing interest in my design, my calculations with a VGT turbo show that this could be a dead end due to the rods being so weak, (with an engine rebuild (strengthen) this has potential to be a very mean engine) im looking into the rear and mid mount turbo setups now, they might be an option as the power is much more gradual.

Yup, it's rods, and the overall HP isn't that much of deal. It's about the torque. Because you can have full boost at 2200 ( my experience) the loads through the rods at slow engine speeds is the issue. Therefore steps have to be taken to reduce torque.

When comparing with US figures I found a lot of bullshit. I was massively short with my results, using the same boost, afm volts, afr, and ignition timing as other cars. I didn't want to push my set up as it was a daily car.

What setup do you run?

im looking into the rear and mid mount turbo setups now, they might be an option as the power is much more gradual.

Nothing gradual about rear mount setups, they come on just as hard as front mount.

Seriously, you can't go past what Nissan have already designed, I know from experience the factory manifold is much easier than an STS kit, or GT35 in the boot. Just imagine the headaches you will have pumping the oil return back to the engine... I don't need to, I have already been there. :/

What setup do you run?

He went back to NA because he's limp.

I ran a HKS z33 single turbo kit (gt3037) modified to fit a awd stagea.

It gave me a 70 kW gain at 6psi. It was tuned very safe, and tuned to reduce low range torque.

I ran a HKS z33 single turbo kit (gt3037) modified to fit a awd stagea.

It gave me a 70 kW gain at 6psi. It was tuned very safe, and tuned to reduce low range torque.

The kit looks very nice, why did you revert to na?

Nothing gradual about rear mount setups, they come on just as hard as front mount.

Seriously, you can't go past what Nissan have already designed, I know from experience the factory manifold is much easier than an STS kit, or GT35 in the boot. Just imagine the headaches you will have pumping the oil return back to the engine... I don't need to, I have already been there. :/

They dyno graphs that i could find for the people who do run front mount coolers with rear mount turbos they seem to be getting happy around 4.5k mark and the car revs 6.5k it is not much of a power band, with this type of engine as scotty says once turbo they should spool up nice and early (3037) (depending on turbo ofcourse)

I went back because I wanted a track car, and this was not it. It was a Mummy trolley. So I bought a very modified 180sx which I track. There was also a couple of things that annoyed me about running the turbo. Mainly the inability to run closed loop, and the tuning of gearbox pressures.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • just an update to this, poor man pays twice  Tried sanding down the pulleys but it didnt do the trick. Chucked another second hand alternator in the na car which I got for free off my mate and its fixed the squelling. Must have been unlucky with the bearings.    As for my turbo car, I managed to pick up a cwc rb alternator conversion bracket + LS alternator for 250 off marketplace, looked to be in really good nick. Installed it , started the car and its not charging the battery.... ( Im not good with auto elec stuff so im not sure if this was all I needed to do but I verified such by using a multimeter on the battery when the engine was running and I was only getting 12.2v )   I had to modify the earth strap for the new LS alternator , factory earth strap was a 10mm bolt which did not fit the bolt on the LS alternator which was double the size so I cut it off , went to repco bought some ring terminals that fit, crimped it onto the old earth strap and bolted it up to the alternator , started the car and same issue. Ran like shit and was reading 12.2 at the battery.  For a "plug and play" advertised kit thats not very plug and play but alas.  My question is , am I missing something ? Ive been reading that some people recommend upgrading the stock 80 amp alternator fuse to a 140 amp but I dont see how that would stop the alternator charging especially at idle not under load.  Regardless ive pulled it out and am going to get it bench tested by an auto elec tomorrow but it would be handy to know if ive missed something silly or have done something wrong.   
    • My wild guess is that you have popped off an intake pipe....check all of the hoses between the turbo and the throttle for splits or loose clamps.
    • Awesome, thanks for sharing!
    • To provide more specific help, more information is needed. What Android screen? What is its wiring diagram? Does the car's wiring have power at any required BAT and ACC wires, and is the loom's earth good?
    • So, now all you need to do is connect the 2 or 3x 12v feeds into the unit to permanent 12v, ACC 12V and IGN 12V that you can find in the spot behind the stereo, and the earth, and then it will switch on with the car.
×
×
  • Create New...