Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok, basic question.

Car A: From the factory has a 2.0L engine making 123kw with a 2.25" exhaust, one muffler and one resonator. (And a cat)

Car B: From the factory has a 2.5L engine making 123kw with a 1.75" exhaust, one muffler and one resonator. (And a cat)

I own Car A, and the aftermarket muffler on it is too loud for my daily needs. I can get the muffler off Car B for $20. Being that they make the same power, will putting the muffler from Car B onto Car A cause a restriction due to the drop in pipe size?

Cheers

p.s. purpose of this is to save money. OEM replacement for my car is $400. Universal muffler is still alot more than $20 and may be louder than a stock option off another car.

Edited by Bennis

What if car A needs no more than 2.25" to flow freely and reach it's calculated power output.

And car B, given that it has a bigger motor has the potential to make more power, but the manufacturer uses a 1.75" for nvh purposes which also has the effect of restricting power to 123kw.

Disclaimer: I know absolutely nothing about exhaust design haha

Edit: My point is it may be a restriction

Edited by r31slpr

You're going from 2.25" to 1.75", of course it will there will be restriction. If the goal is to quieten your exhaust and you're too poor to buy anything other than that muffler mentioned, then you don't have much of a choice do you?

If you have a crappy hotdog resonator, replace it with an oval type (bigger/heavier the better, more baffling). Same goes for a cannon rear muffler.

I doubt very much that a drop in size of 0.5" at the muffler will make enough difference to be discernable.

Do a bit of reading on Charles Law, and you will see why. The gas temp at the muffler is about 25% of the temp at the manifold, ergo you can quite drastically reduce the diameter of the exhaust a fair whack (and a lot of manufacturers do) without causing a restriction. There are also more than a few proponents out there that support the idea that reducing the back end of the exhaust diameter will actually help pulse scavenging (in an NA car, obviously not in a turbo application) which will contribute to low end pulling power.

Its also for this reason why hi-flow cats make a difference to performance, and cannons do not.

Personally, I would not let the back end diameter get below the std exhaust size from the manufacturer though.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The incentives are mostly the same, yes. Ethanol is cheap compared to the cost of doing 98-100 RON with crude oil alone. 87 to 93-94 AKI all with E10. In 2020 Canada mandated E10 as a part of their "renewable fuel standard" and is supposedly going to go to E15 in 2030. In California where there are only 8 refineries with two threatening to shut down next year it's been over 20 years now of E10 and 91 AKI maximum because there's just not enough refinery capacity or crude oil supply relative to the demand for premium unleaded fuel. And CARB's low carbon fuel standard means functionally none of the diesel available at the pump is made from crude oil anymore. It's almost all entirely 20% biodiesel blended with 80% renewable diesel (hydrotreated vegetable oil) now. The number of gasoline vehicles that support E15 or higher ethanol concentrations is surprisingly low, I can't imagine it being wise to play tricks like this without flex fuel sensors in most of the fleet.
    • It's almost certainly the same as the one next to it. Have a fish around amongst these hits https://www.google.com/search?q=surface+mount+transistor+m33&sca_esv=9cb49794e0b2005d&source=hp&ei=2vJ5aNjTB7Kw0PEPldnS8QM&iflsig=AOw8s4IAAAAAaHoA6qkfmF6XcygtrZ4Vu9f92NXF_RFd&ved=0ahUKEwjYqIPP7MWOAxUyGDQIHZWsND4Q4dUDCA8&uact=5&oq=surface+mount+transistor+m33&gs_lp=Egdnd3Mtd2l6IhxzdXJmYWNlIG1vdW50IHRyYW5zaXN0b3IgbTMzMgUQIRigATIFECEYoAEyBRAhGKABMgUQIRigAUjKCFAAWABwAHgAkAEAmAHfAaAB3wGqAQMyLTG4AQPIAQD4AQL4AQGYAgGgAuYBmAMAkgcDMi0xoAfMBLIHAzItMbgH5gHCBwMyLTHIBwU&sclient=gws-wiz
    • South Australia, which is hardly as far behind as the rest pf Oz makes out, and who is also not a paragon of progressiveness (read that as over-legislation) in the area of vehicle standards, has this to say on the subject: Adjustable coil-over suspension Aftermarket adjustable coil-over suspension components are suspension units that incorporate an external thread on the main body and corresponding threaded spring saddle that allows the vehicle's suspension height to be varied. If fitting aftermarket or coil-over suspension components you must submit an Application to modify a light motor vehicle form and a report from a light vehicle engineering signatory (LVES).
    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
×
×
  • Create New...