Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Guys that HKS GTRS is really just a GT2871R with a 52 trim compressor . Comes on song at 3700 on an SR20 ? My US SR contacts claim the larger HKS GT3037 52T spools at 25-2700 rpm and would easily out gun a GTRS . The 3037's are using the T25/28 flanged .73 ARR HKS GT30 exhaust housing and usually the RNN14 GTiR exhaust manifold .

That GT3071R at the GCG site is not the same as the one from ATP turbo in this string . The only way to make it work properly is with the HKS GT30 style exhaust housings . All the ones using GT28 exhaust housings are dogs - wrong type of turbine housing for the turbine .

Cheers A .

  • Replies 96
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Those who have interest in the gt30 rb or vg hybrid.

There's a thread floating around where some one had a vg30 turbine housing machined up to suit their gcg highflow. If I remember correctly they went from 240 something rwkw to 270 something rwkw.

I plan to do similiar using a GT30 700177-7 CHRA and .6 Comp cover machined up in to the VG30DET/R34 turbine housing.

Hopefully push 18-20psi through it.

Or... there is also the GT30 700177-14 CHRA that runs the larger comp wheel. The only issue with this is I am unsure if there is a .6 comp cover available for it. I really don't want to run a .7 due to clearance issues.

Edited by Cubes

Why is choosing a turbo so hard?? ;)

I don't know a lot on turbo figures and everyone has something different to say - GCG say the turbo would be good for an RB25DET with RB25 turbine housing.

- discopotato who seems to know his stuff doesn't suggest it as a good combination

- My tuner can't see anything wrong with the GT3071R and can get me a good price including the flanges and adaptors and everything

lol it's all too hard.... *confused*

Now that we know someone has made 250kw @ wheels with a GT3071R on an RB20DET (other thread) with full boost by 4000rpm, we can agree that the GT3071R is a good unit?

I have a VG30DET housing, this can be machined out to fit the GT30 turbine wheel happily enough - and the GT3071R comes with a .5a/r TO4E compressor housing.... shouldn't this combination be able to fit down low easier than the GT30R low mount described in that other thread, and provide some awesome performance for an RB25DET?

It sounds like the GT3071R-WG (w/ cut down turbine) was a good combo for the RB20DET.

well, I currently am running a GT30r with a VG30 housing machined to fit.

Currently running 200rwkw at 7psi, lol. Still waiting FOR MY f**kEN INJECTORS.

lol anyway, I Will be sure to let you know how this goes.

The comp Cover is a .7

On an SR20 what boost are they most efficient at? about 1.1 bar or more?

The GT-RS is a little high for my liking. If you could strap one to an un-opened motor and get a safe 220rwkw at max efficiency or close to it, I think they would be an awesome option for street use.

Hmm I'm starting to look more into a GCG Hi-flow now..

I just want my 250rwkws dammit!! :)

dude,

the garrett GT3071R (external w/gate version) will flow enough air to make 250rwkw happily.

the comp wheel itself can flow up to ~450bhp, and the turbine is the 60mm GT30 wheel which flows ~500bhp easily.

the GT3071R with A/R .82 on an RB25DEt would be a killer combination IMHO.

good luck anyway.

I just took off 3071 internal gate turbo from my r32 gtst as it was shit... couldn't control boost kept going in excess of 22psi. Made good power up high 254 at 8250rpm. Dog under 4000rpm and only exciting from 5000rpm.

External gate on rb25 would be ok, internal gate - forget it. Rb20 forget it.

hows it feel on 7psi? N/A like? :rolleyes:

lol actually, the car is much punchier down low with this turbo, as it must be able to breathe easier because the turbine isn't creating as much resistance being a ball bearing.

and I said, 7psi = about 200rwkw... Its definately not N\A like... With a good launch, chirps all the way through second :)

I just took off 3071 internal gate turbo from my r32 gtst as it was shit...  couldn't control boost kept going in excess of 22psi.  Made good power up high 254 at 8250rpm.  Dog under 4000rpm and only exciting from 5000rpm.

External gate on rb25 would be ok, internal gate - forget it.  Rb20 forget it.

I'm running an internal gate. No problems here.. With the wastegate completely open, it makes a max of 3psi boost.

Edited by The Mafia

Mafia,

I found the same thing, upon fitting the larger turbo it has free'd up the bottom end, feels freeier and tends to free rev quiker also.

More off the line let the clutch out torque. :rolleyes:

What I meant by N/A like, so its not linear then? lags a little then hits solid and pulls?

What I meant by N/A like, so its not linear then? lags a little then hits solid and pulls?

Team america - f**k YEAH

hehe

yeah pulls harder off boost, but then catches boost and starts chirping in second lol

so yeah, hit boost and starts going like your mum - an animal

(hehehe jokes)

I wouldn't say its like na at all

Roy - I'd misread the full boost thing.... though he did say 14psi by 4000rpm, which is pretty decent spool, no? This is bearing in mind that RB20DETs don't spool turbos overly well, and need a few revs to go - I'd imagine (as Quincy said...) that one should go very nicely on an RB25DET.

Mafia - Do you know if there were any modifications to the VG30 wastegate port to allow it to hold boost like that? Are you using a Garrett supplied actuator with it?

I'd say you hit the nail on the head Cubes , if a turbine side is causing a major restriction uncorking it pays off . It makes me wonder if the small turbine and housing combination had some emissions benefit - sort of heat and a little forced EGR .

Notice how at times larger ARR turbine housings pull the cork out and unleashes a few ponies with no change to the compressor or cover . I guess it comes down to how well the sysyem was designed in the first place and its aims .

The combination I always wanted to see on an RB20 was the 25 exhaust housing on an otherwise std turbo , how much gained compared to how much lost . At least it should all fit and look standard .

The GT3071R (-23 CHRA) is biased toward exhaust flow turbine wise so may not need big housings to make it work depending on the desired state of tune and engine size .

Roy - I'd misread the full boost thing.... though he did say 14psi by 4000rpm, which is pretty decent spool, no?  This is bearing in mind that RB20DETs don't spool turbos overly well, and need a few revs to go - I'd imagine (as Quincy said...) that one should go very nicely on an RB25DET.

Mafia - Do you know if there were any modifications to the VG30 wastegate port to allow it to hold boost like that?  Are you using a Garrett supplied actuator with it?

no modifications what so ever to the waste gate port. And I am running the garret actuator with it.

No problems. With the gate fully open, the most boost it will make is 4psi, max.

I've got a GT30R To go on a RB20 and I am abit worred it is going to be to big and laggy???.

Specs are .7 front cover 58mm wheel and rear housing 0.63 56mm wheel.

Dont know why i was sold such a big front cover? and it is internerly gated,

Any one got any idear when it would come on boost and what have other people got on there RB20's, what kind of power will it make-230 or so on 1 bar?

It would be great if any one could help me out, Thanks

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
    • I know I have to get a wheel alignment but until then I just need to bring the rear tyres in a bit they're wearing to the belt on the inside and brand new on the outside edge. I did shorten the arms a bit but got it wrong now after a few klms the Slip and VDC lights come on. I'd just like to get it to a point where I can drive for another week or two before getting an alignment. I've had to pay a lot of other stuff recently so doing it myself is my only option 
×
×
  • Create New...