Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Std high flow makes 100kws at 3000RPMs and maxing out at 320rwkws on E85. Note this turbo hit 20psi at 3400RPMs, there isn't many turbos out there can do this without chocking the engine tho. Pump 98 fuel usually makes 40kws less. It is cheaper then what cost you to buy a TD06, after testing all this TD06 based turbos, I'm fairly sure it is far more responsive then any thing based in a 10cm turbine and makes more power internally gated.

Added 270214:

labeled dyno reading from 21U high flow internally gated on Stock manifold E85 (take 40kws off for P98 result)

21uhfpowerlabeled.jpg

How does the 2IU highflow compare to the atr43ss1PU?

Looks like they both get full boost at 3400, but the ss1pu has 30rwkw more in it? How much physically bigger is the front cover on the ss1pu compared to the highflow?

What's the difference between the two on the street in terms of driveability?

  • Like 1

I think the SS2 or a OP6 high flow will suit your car better.

Reason is I've found out that your car is a AWD GTS4. By experience not only that they are 12% lake in power to the RWD Skylines, they also run the turbine end hotter. The end result will be more successful with a larger rear housing, that makes the engine much happier too.

Other thing need to be understood is turbocharger isn't magic, making 20psi by 3400rpms requires high exhaust gas velocity in low rpms, which does not satisfy the flow requirement in upper rev range or compensate for high boost. There for most 500HP rated turbochargers kicks in 20psi region around 4000RPMs mark using a larger turbine housing.

Solution on the extreme side is high temperature variable turbine geometry system, heat resistant silicon nitrate ball bearing system and high efficiency compressor wheel (ATR43SS-Alpha system). On this setup we can have 20psi by 3500RPMS, make good power while not chocking the engine. Sadly this turbocharger so far can only work on an externally gated system, complicated to build and expansive.

powerallmarked.jpg

I think the SS2 or a OP6 high flow will suit your car better.

Reason is I've found out that your car is a AWD GTS4. By experience not only that they are 12% lake in power to the RWD Skylines, they also run the turbine end hotter. The end result will be more successful with a larger rear housing, that makes the engine much happier

[[/img]

Is the cost of the op6 highflow the same as the cost of the 2IU highflow? I can't seem to find the 'high flows' on your website?

What's the op6 rated too on e85? Do you have an op6 e85 dyno sheet by any chance please?

Cost to high flow is same.

All the results has been indexed on page one of my high flow thread. Along with many other.

21U result is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page__st__7000

Op6 result is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-461

Note 4WD systems usually creates a bit more drag, acts very similar to higher dyno ramp. Which usually ends up with better response and less power, probably because the combustion discharging temp is higher under greater load..

  • Like 1

Cost to high flow is same.

All the results has been indexed on page one of my high flow thread. Along with many other.

21U result is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page__st__7000

Op6 result is at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-461

Note 4WD systems usually creates a bit more drag, acts very similar to higher dyno ramp. Which usually ends up with better response and less power, probably because the combustion discharging temp is higher under greater load..

Have you done much testing with the addition of cams regarding boost response?

Can't wait to have an fresh highflow under the bonnet

The cams I used was 264 dur / 9 Tomei from CJmotor, and only CJmotor has them. That was a waste of time and effort, made 3kws of power differences for 400RPMs of lag. For the HP level expected, standard cams works best.

details are at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-452

The cams I used was 264 dur / 9 Tomei from CJmotor, and only CJmotor has them. That was a waste of time and effort, made 3kws of power differences for 400RPMs of lag. For the HP level expected, standard cams works best.

details are at:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/261613-hypergear-hiflow-service-continued/page-452

Jeez.... Glad I spent $700 on tomei 256 poncams.... :/

Unfortunately building turbochargers isn't just about turning lathe, people isn't just buying a turbo, they are buying their desired HP goal. Ensuring the outcome I must not only be an excellent engineer, the engineering must be closely related to the power generating subject which on SAU is a Rb25det motor along with all of its components.

Yes I have a book of dyno sheets contain 1806 pages. that recorded the behavior of a Rb25det in many different aspects, its very useful in directing the shortest path archiving certain performance goals.

I think the issue he was mentioning is with VCT off it fudges the figures a fair bit. You can't say a certain set of cams is no good just because it din't work on your particular setup.

I am of the opinion the stock cams are usually the best option anyway... Upgrading cams is the last thing I would suggest, and only on well sorted high power setups. More important is keeping the gas speeds up.

Yes they will have better low range power because nearly every aftermarket cam shift the powerband slighty up but makes more mid to top power

But with staos car setup it wasn't a fair comparison with stock vs tomei cams as the std had VCt and the tomei didn't

I don't know much about rbs but maybe cause the duration or lift VCt is incompatible but it would be better to compare a smaller aftermarket cam with VCt vs std cam then you can say if it's worth changing cams or not so his test was flawed

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...