Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey,

I've just ordered a Tomei fuel pressure reg, and noticed I shanked it. I've ordered the type L which is for high boost setups.

Here are the specs:

post-93817-13935642253751_thumb.jpg

I've got an R32 GTR, HKS GTSS's, poncams, 700cc injectors, HKS Fuel pump, HKS turbo back. Can I still use the type L for 18-22psi?

Or should I cut it away and get the type S?

You should be OK. It will try and maintain pressure at X+manifold pressure, so a larger valve will need to be slightly more closed than a smaller valve at the same pressure.

If you are really worried borrow a fuel pressure sensor and hook it up to the regular before starting the car. You will quickly see if it is holding the correct pressure at idle - which is when the regulator is doing the most work.

Hope that makes sense!

Also, I think high boost / low boost is misleading terminology to use for a fuel pressure regulator.

Remember the regulator is controlling the return from the rail, not the feed.

So, a regulator needs to be sized so it is large enough to return fuel from your fuel system at idle.

A larger fuel pump requires more fuel to be returned.

On boost, the regulator is returning less fuel, as more is going out the injectors.

Therefore, it follows that higher boost means less fuel to be returned.

In summary a fuel pressure regulator is not sized based on boost or power output, it is based on fuel flow rate at idle, which is when it will have to return 95% of the fuel flow back to the tank.

Yeah thanks for that. Think I'll just cut it away and go with the Type S. Wasted money and potential by the sounds of things.

If you are ever planning to go to a larger fuel pump then it is one thing you won't need to upgrade.

What is the max power rating of the HKS pump?

Nothing wrong with stock reg. How much power you chasing? Why change it?

That depends entirely on the pump setup, for example the stock regulator will not be able to control the pressure if you have 2x 044s behind it.

For the HKS pump on the other hand, yes it would likely flow enough just fine.

  • 4 weeks later...

That depends entirely on the pump setup, for example the stock regulator will not be able to control the pressure if you have 2x 044s behind it.

For the HKS pump on the other hand, yes it would likely flow enough just fine.

won't that just mean it will return more fuel to the tank? doesn't the regulator open above 43.5psi?

That depends entirely on the pump setup, for example the stock regulator will not be able to control the pressure if you have 2x 044s behind it.

For the HKS pump on the other hand, yes it would likely flow enough just fine.

Yes it will. Seen it on more than one setup, both Nismo and factory units with duel 044's.

OP, you'll be fine although it's not needed.

Yes it will. Seen it on more than one setup, both Nismo and factory units with duel 044's.

OP, you'll be fine although it's not needed.

Interesting to know!

Do you know if the dual 044 setup pressure lines were T'd together before feeding the rail, or was the rail dual entry centre return?

In my case each 044 has its own pressure line leading to each end of the rail. Which is why I went with a aftermarket FPR off the centre of the rail.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...