Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Getting this error msg now when selecting more reply options to upload pics

"Sorry, you don't have permission for that!"

Was successful once and then the above msg on next few attempts

I'm not being logged in automatically. When I do log in, I get:

I'm still sorting out the redirects, the problem is probably because you're going to skylinesaustralia.com and not sau.com.au.

Sorry, must have missed the news about the change of domain name.

Made the change in my bookmarks, and it seems to work as before.

Tks

  • 2 weeks later...

Still getting a lot of 502 and some 504 errors accessing SAU

Really??? When was the last one?

What URL were you visiting?

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/forum/51-nsw-members-area/

Threads within here and even http://www.sau.com.au

The last one I had was just minutes before I posted that. I couldn't get onto SAU for around half an hour this morning.

Can you please take screen shots next time and upload them to the Downtime Registry thread? I haven't had any problems for days and I cant find anything in the logs. Might be a caching problem

Sure thing! I think the 502s were the same as the one i posted earlier but I'll start capturing it a lot better for you. Will note down times etc too.

I'm not working at the moment, life is boring when SAU goes down! LOL.

  • 3 weeks later...

Prank - may be a co-incidence but on the last two times i've uploaded a pic, i get the cloudflare 502 immediately after on any sau.com.au URLs. It occured just now with a ~250k file. I can supply ntp squid logs if that helps.

Prank - may be a co-incidence but on the last two times i've uploaded a pic, i get the cloudflare 502 immediately after on any sau.com.au URLs. It occured just now with a ~250k file. I can supply ntp squid logs if that helps.

Yeah I've kinda had it and will be creating a new image to base new instances on this weekend. Its driving me nuts!

Does the image upload work? Even if it throws an error?

The image upload works but the next page after that dies. The third image i uploaded (second for today) seemed to be ok though...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...