Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

But seriously......how long is this piece of string that you're trying to measure? Are we in 1st gear? 3rd? 5th? Uphill? Downhill?

As to the 4.9 sec 0-100 time......of course it's with a decent launch. A high rpm launch? Depends on what you cal high rpm. But realistically, on any given surface, there's only really one correct rpm to launch at, and it's not necessarily "high". ~4500rpm side stepping the clutch will get you moving fairly briskly, but the turbos won't be "fully spooled" at those revs before you let the clutch out. But they sure as hell would be if you were driving uphill in 4th.

That was my question, when are they " fully spooled." from a standing start and you say they are not fully spooled at 4500rpm in 1st. I thought they would be going hard at 4000rpm with smallish twins?

I was not really interested it those times but they were pretty quick in 1999, even now.

That was my question, when are they " fully spooled." from a standing start and you say they are not fully spooled at 4500rpm in 1st. I thought they would be going hard at 4000rpm with smallish twins?

I was not really interested it those times but they were pretty quick in 1999, even now.

I didn't say "in first". Nobody launches "in first". Everybody launches with the clutch in. Ergo, the likelihood that the turbos are fully spooled up at 4000rpm BEFORE you let the clutch out and load the engine is pretty slim. The turbos will then go on to make boost once the load is applied, but you can bet your last 50c that you get full boost later (in terms of rpm) on a 1st gear launch than you would if you did a rolling start in 1st at say 1500rpm.

That's why I took the position I did on answering your question. You failed to specify exactly what you were asking about.

  • Like 1

Well each gear, peak boost will be reached at different rpm due to load, will it not?

And farken "full boost". Unless it has some sort of reference to it (eg 25 psi), it's the most meaningless thing ever. Are we talking 5 psi or 55 psi?

Oh, I'm going off a controlled environment. Dyno.

This is still silly though. I think this is a school holiday question.

Just asked when a stock R34GTR would be fully spooled from a standing start, not launched at 4500 or 8000rpm, just let the clutch out and put your foot down.

Hadouken did something strange, he just gave me the answer, going at 4k , thanks Mate

Back to school now :)

Well each gear, peak boost will be reached at different rpm due to load, will it not?

And farken "full boost". Unless it has some sort of reference to it (eg 25 psi), it's the most meaningless thing ever. Are we talking 5 psi or 55 psi?

Whatever a stock standard R34GTR is, doubt if many are 5 or 55psi, you sure do swear a lot Mr Piggaz :))

Before my engine met its fourth untimely demise, I was going to ask a boost related query.

Mind you this is a 4 speed auto that's been built a lot.

1st gear would see 22psi at about 4k and bleed off to about 21.

2nd gear would see 25psi and then bleed off to about 24.

3rd gear would see 29 psi and bleed off to about 25.

4th gear (lol) would see 30psi and crack the wastegate which is what the boost controller was set to.

There were no boost leaks in the system that were obvious. There were concerns about the FMIC not liking it and maybe not flowing boost through, but it certainly made no audible sound when an air compressor was attached to the intake.

On the dyno, it made 30PSI at about 3200 RPM, in 3rd gear. The on-road experience was different.

Is this load related? The vibe I always got was that "boost is later with less load" which makes sense, but I also got that it was a few RPM difference between first gear and top gear, not multiple PSI.

Just curious to hear what others experience in 'the real world'

The general rule is exactly as you say. Higher gears mean slower ramp rates on the road, giving more time to get the gas flow up and so you make boost at lower rpm. 1st gear in particular, the ramp rate is so fast that the engine will happily accelarate through the revs faster than the turbo can spool up to give you boost. If the system is all well balanced then you get the above characteristic.

If you have a turbo with a small hot side that restricts flow, then you can actually find that you don't make more total boost in the high gears. It might still have a lower boost threshold and reach full boost earlier in those higher gears, but it might not reach the same peak boost as maybe it will in 2nd, and it may tail off more. My car with std Neo turbo tends to do that although I must admit that I haven't spent a lot of time trying to tune the gain on the boost controller to dial it out. The number of times I can usefully load the car up in high gears for long enough to be bothered by not making enough boost there are too few to cry over these days. Well, actually, the lack of such opportunities is something to cry over.

Edited by GTSBoy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
    • What sold me on Trailer Park Boys is this scene: Great stuff, just stay clear from the new Netflix production.
×
×
  • Create New...