Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey everybody, I have a garrett 3076 external wastegate version ( not sure on the a/r) and was wondering where I can purchase a different rear housing? Im wanting to go to a internal wastegate.. I've heard this is possible, please correct me if I'm wrong. Bit of a noob when it comes to turbos.

Thanks for any help in advance.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/449525-replace-rear-housing/
Share on other sites

We can machine you a IWG .82 rear housing that has a 6 bolt Nissan pattern on the rear, with actuator with bracket supplied, plus the exhaust manifold spacer. In total you will be looking to spend $600.

I should probably give a bit more info.

I recently purchased a GTT which came with a - but not installed - HKS 3037 external wastegate version (56 trim?). Which apparently is exactly the same as a Garrett 3076R. Also got a Trust exhaust manifold for an external gate setup.

So far from the research I've done, it would be simpler and cheaper just to stay with an internal gate system, which is the reason for my original question.

Or would I be better off going the external gate route.?

Yes I realize what I have already been told. But about which route I should take is where I'm not sure on. I've read that an internal gate can be restrictive on how much boost can be run and that a .82 internal gate housing will spool slower than if it was an external gate setup instead.. Is this true? Im looking for a fun street use setup that will go well on the track aswell. And money isnt the biggest issue.

hks 3037 had the cropped turbine wheel iirc

so a standard gt30 rear end won't work

So using Bens rear housing won't work, I take it this won't work either?

http://www.sonicperformance.com.au/771300-GT30/Garrett-GT30-T3-Internal-Gate-Turbine-Housing/pd.php

Would the hypergear one work or would I better off just using what I have and going the external gate route?

So using Bens rear housing won't work, I take it this won't work either?

http://www.sonicperformance.com.au/771300-GT30/Garrett-GT30-T3-Internal-Gate-Turbine-Housing/pd.php

Would the hypergear one work or would I better off just using what I have and going the external gate route?

That's what I have.

Hypergear should be able to machine a hkusing to suit your turbo.

Okay so I'll keep that in mind that I'll be looking at about $600 for an internal gate rear housing.

Now, what I'd also like to know, seeing as I already have the manifold for it, what are the pros and cons of internal vs external gate in this particular set up? Besides the fact I'll need to buy an external gate and the fab work.
Can one handle more boost than the other? Or is one laggier than the other?

Sell hks turbo complete buy bens gt3076r. Hks gt3037 has a cropped exhaust wheel as stated above. Same as the gt2835.

That's genius!

If you were considering a housing for 600 a whole turbo for 1250 makes sense. Approx 500o k's use and includes dump pipe.

I was seriously considering it but im going a high mount ext gate as I think itll match the plazmaman plenum better I think. But op should def buy and sell the hks. Wont lose money as the hks 3037's still get $1000+ mark.

No, they are just saying that the HKS turbos used a cropped wheel. So the 2835 is a cropped 3071, the 3037 i believe is a cropped 3076

HKS 3037 and 2835 are two completely different turbos, the 3037 will deliver more power with more lag.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...