Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Went to fill up this morning, and the E-Flex pumps were taped off. Spoke to the guy behind the counter and he said that Caltex are no longer bringing in stock of E85. He said that a couple of servo's still have a few weeks' stock, and then that's it.

Anyone else heard this news? He suggested partitioning Caltex to keep E85 in SA.

So if this is true... then the only place left is United. For me, the closest is probably the Adelaide airport station (which I hope is 24 hours... might not be). Unfortunately, my tuner says the United mix is higher ethanol content (about E80-E85 compared to Caltex E60-E70 ish). This is good for power, but probably means a retune. Or a calculated mix with some added '98.

Nistune do flex-fuel sensors now, but that looks like costing another $2,500-3000 because a lot of re-tuning is required.

Anybody else running E85?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/450598-no-more-caltex-e85-e-flex-in-sa/
Share on other sites

I thought there was one closer to me but I was wrong....

Caltex down Seaford way does not,nor did it ever as far as i know, stock E85.

Not sure of the nearest United to me but it is very annoying not to have the option :angry:

Haven't seen any E85 at the united's down south, being Adelaide it wouldn't surprise me if the airport was the closest one.

For me, the closest is probably the Adelaide airport station (which I hope is 24 hours... might not be).

The airport one is 24h (or was...)

  • Like 1

At least it's 24 hours but yeah, 20 minutes for me too. Trouble for me is that my stagea is tuned for E85. I've got a '98 map but it's only for low boost, and there's a bit of messing around required to get it on the ECU because my consult port is on the blink at the moment.

I think I also need to get a retune to use the United E85 since it's properly 80-85% instead of about 60% (E-Flex) which my tune was done on.

Just add the approximate percentage of petrol and you will be fine, err on the side of rich and you will be more than safe enough. (your cold start will probably improve :P)

A wideband is a good idea for these situations, my new WB kit only cost $130us...

Shame the Caltex boffins are shutting it down, but I guess it just isn't viable for them now that United are in on it.

I had considered doing my own in-tank mix of 98 and E85 too... when you say to err on the side of "rich", do you mean err on the side of more 98 (lower % ethanol) or more E85 (higher % ethanol)?

The issue I think with the United E85 is too much ethanol means it will effectively lean out, as the burn ratio would actually call for more fuel, so I need to add some 98 to reduce the overall ethanol percentage probably to about 75% (to be safe)?

By my rough calculations (I'm terrible at maths), if 51 litres (ethanol content) / 60 litres (rough tank capacity) = 85% (united mix), then 45L / 60L = 75%... so I add about 6 litres of 98 and then fill the rest with E85.

Sound OK?

I think a wideband O2 sensor sounds like a good idea, and Nistune supports that now (although I'm mainly worried about the high load/max boost/max revs type scenarios). Where have you got your sensor installed, is it mounted permanently?

6L would be ok. I used to add that much anyway in winter just to help with chilly cold starts. 10L of 98 would work fine too. It isn't too critical, ethanol gives you a fair safety margin, and the chance you will foul plugs is minimal.

The wideband is standalone, you don't need to plug it into the Nistune. I use mine for road tuning and to make sure the mixtures are ok.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...