Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I've finally done it! I've gone down to the drag strip and took my R33 for a run. With no mods, well except for a K&N panel filter and a heavy duty clutch I managed to get a 14.9 on my first go. Searching on his forum looks like most stock skylines get between low 15s and high 14s. So atleast I know my car is doing OK. Timeslip can be found here

http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rafsland/DSC01425.jpg

Now that I have the BUG to get a better time I looking to you guys for some advice. Before I start increasing my horse power I would like to be able to launch as good as I can. So what rpm do you guys find that gives you the best times and what about types pressure?

My first launch I launched with about 3500 rpm. My second launch I used 5000 rpm and my time was a little worse 15.06. The track at willow bank is so grippy I thought more rpms would be a good idea :(

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45119-first-drag-in-my-r33/
Share on other sites

That 60' isn't *too* bad at 2.269 .. i mean even if you got a really good launch you'd could get it down to a flat 2.0. Even if you did theoretically thats really only going to knock 0.269 off your final time, and you would still be mid 14's there really. So probably that 3500 to launch at is not too bad to be honest in your car.

So really it points to just the rest of the power not being there in your car after that initial 60' - combined with slow gearchanges or something like that as the MPH is a little low.

So really, just some modifications if you ask me will push you into lower 14sec territory and beyond.

Thanks for the reply! There is another "test and tune" at willowbank in a couple of weeks. I would like to improve on my time, hopefully get it into the mid 14's .. Gee first time ever to willowbank and Im hooked, it's worse then nicotine ;)

Your saying my mph is a little low :( for a stock R33. My gear changes were as quick as I could possibly move my hands and I reved just before limiter, 6999. Also using BP ultimate - oh and I just changed the oil to castrol 5/30. What MPH should I be getting?

At the moment I just want to concentrate on getting my stock R33 optimised - then work on that!!

Has anyone found advancing the timming to improve the MPH? Maybe my timming is out a little!?!?!

Even if you did theoretically thats really only going to knock 0.269 off your final time

Have you been drinking?

Well done on not being one of the talkers and actually getting out there!!! Regarding the above comment, taking 0.269sec off of your 60 foot time will have the effect of taking more like 0.5 - 0.6 secs off of your ET. Having said that, it's a great start. There are people on this forum that are running low 12's that because of a 2.2 60' time, can't take advantage of their extra horsepower.

Try different things to get the most out of your car. Try running 20psi in your rear tyres to aid in the launch, change gears just before 7krpm and have fun.

Let us know how you go and good luck.

Adrian

Have you been drinking?

probably...think i was mixing up something i was going to say and what i did say :-s oops

if you get past the first 60' quicker, you will be going quicker at that point, which should mean you get a higher MPH and better time at the end. it will definitely be more than 0.269 :)

but anyhow.. test and tune is also wednesday nights also. Few of the SAU regulars will be there tomorrow night running (inc me).. Have only run a few times in VIC (and didn't do spectacularly) so will be interesting to see how i go.

Is the "test and tune" busy on Wednesday nights? Last saturday night it took about 1.5 hours to get a run. :P

Next time I go down the track I'll play with the tyre pressure. I'll give the 20psi a go!

Do you think it is possible to get a flat 2 60ft with a stock skyline? Has it been done before?

Yeah i think a flat 2 would be possible with the correct setup and a good launch.

I was also going to point out what 2rismo picked up on. Up to the 60ft mark is where you'll make or break so to speak. My advice would be to work on your starts. That's where you can pick up some time if you know what you're doing.

Scott

You got the bug just like me :(

Your mph might be a little low but I wouldnt expect it to rise very much until you get an exhaust. The 60ft is good for a first time.

When I had a cat back and pod I ran 14.3@98mph with a 2.4 60ft.

0.269sec off of your 60 foot time will have the effect of taking more like 0.5 - 0.6 secs off of your ET

That means my car is good for 13.2-13.3 with a decent launch... I really gotta practice my launches.

taking 0.269sec off of your 60 foot time will have the effect of taking more like 0.5 - 0.6 secs off of your ET.

The basic rule of thumb is, every tenth gained over the 60' is two tenths off the ET. So as a random example... say someone was to run a 12.357 ET on a 2.119 60', and then they managed to drop their 60' to a 1.900, they "should" get an 11.919 ET. And then they would be very happy :(

There are people on this forum that are running low 12's that because of a 2.2 60' time, can't take advantage of their extra horsepower.

Are there? Who? :cheers:

When I had a cat back and pod I ran 14.3@98mph with a 2.4 60ft.  

.

So your saying just an exhaust from the cat back and some decent airflow will drop off ~ 0.5- 0.7 secs?... Even though your 60ft was not awesome. What type of exhaust did you get?

Yep. Exhaust mods are a turbos best friend :rant:

The extra air flow will see the boost rise by a few psi forcing your mph to go up and ET to come down.

Mine is a Jasma 3" and was on the car when it arrived from Japan. I added a 3" dump/front pipe and @ 10psi ran 13.8@101 with a 2.2 60ft. Since then I have added high flow cat and chip and I'm hunting low 13s... I just need to launch it properly.

Thanks for the input guys. it has been helpful and I really want an exhaust now!!! :D

From the research I sifted from the crap and the real 1/4 miles times I have come up with this. I'm trying to keep it real so I can have fun and challenge myself every step of the way through my mods. how does this sound guys?

A stock R33 Skyline GTS-T (when I say stock I mean absolutely nothing done to it - not even an airfilter ) with an experienced driver should get at best down the 1/4 mile a 14.8 - 14.5!!! I think the best I have read is a 14.7...

Give this car a 3 inch catback exhaust and a 14.3 with 2.4 60ft is possible, so maybe a flat 14.0 with an awesome 60ft is possible

Pump up the power with a dump pipe and 10psi and a 13.8 is possible!

Anything extra is into the sub 13 and beyond.. Too many combinations to list!!

All this talk is making me want to go the the drags and see what times I can get!

Another thing that is bothering me, has anyone broken anything going down the quarter with your skyline? Assuming you have less than 250kw at the wheels.

Another thing that is bothering me, has anyone broken anything going down the quarter with your skyline? Assuming you have less than 250kw at the wheels.
I've had around 30+ runs over the last 7mths all around 14.1-14.8sec and never broken a thing. Drive in, run, drive home and live another day :D

I have however had quite a few Holdens destroy themselves right beside me on the first run of the nite hehehe.

I've had around 30+ runs over the last 7mths all around 14.1-14.8sec and never broken a thing. Drive in, run, drive home and live another day :D

I have however had quite a few Holdens destroy themselves right beside me on the first run of the nite hehehe.

hehehe Thats what I like to hear :D ....

When I was talking to the guy I was racing "commodore SS " he warned me to be careful about breaking a diff or somthing on the drive chain as he had done before!! But I was 99.9% sure I had nothing to worry about - after all, the skyline is the upgrade KING it was built for torture :) 30 runs down the track confirms it for me!!!

  • 2 weeks later...

I went down the track again last night in an attempt to beat my last time. Well I succesfully did but cheated a little. Instead of adjusting the tyre pressure and changing my launch revs to get a better time I raised my boost by ~2 psi. I did this by taking of the hose that goes to the solenoid and plugged in a little rod with a hole in it. Got my friends boost gauge and drilled out the hole until I reached ~9psi. Pretty dodgy but it worked. Anyway I managed to get a 1/4 mile time of 14.546 at 94.98 mph and a 60ft time of 2.146.

here is the link http://www.users.bigpond.net.au/rafsland/DSC01426.jpg

Im pretty happy since I beat every stat from my last run without spending a cent. I hope if I add another 2psi I can drop another 0.4s which will give me 14.1 :cheers: without spending a cent.

From the research I sifted from the crap and the real 1/4 miles times I have come up with this. I'm trying to keep it real so I can have fun and challenge myself every step of the way through my mods. how does this sound guys?

A stock R33 Skyline GTS-T (when I say stock I mean absolutely nothing done to it - not even an airfilter ) with an experienced driver should get at best down the 1/4 mile a 14.8 - 14.5!!! I think the best I have read is a 14.7...

I managed to hustle my stock (yes really) gtst in 14.2....but I was running sticky r type tyres so that may be the difference. Unfortuntely the timing at wsid was not working properly that night so they didn't give me a 60' time :P

I managed to hustle my stock (yes really) gtst in 14.2....

I looked at your profile and I noticed you were running 9psi. So I don't think you can say your car is stock - your car was modified slightly. In my case unless my driving was better I was able to reduce my quarter mile by 0.4secs. So for the guys out there looking for the fastest real possible time in a factory condition i.e stock skyline will be mislead. But a 14.2 with only 9psi is still awesome. That time was beating skylines I saw last night that had 300 horses at the wheels - well done.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Meh, I think we're well into a new era of 90s JDM car. The days when spare engines and parts were cheap and plentiful are long gone. Therefore the YOLO approach is now massively difficult to justify, use and maintain. One should start to ponder whether an 800HP build is really justified, using stock parts. My thoughts? If you like/love the car and want to keep it and don't want to ruin yet another one, then be discrete about how much you ask from the stock parts. A 5 or 600 HP build is still a very fast car. If you want to go silly, have to have the 1000HP territory, then just drop all your cash, buy billet everything (or PRP cast block, etc etc) and use a bigger/more modern gearbag, and put a massive retrofit diff and axles into it. If you ruin any of those things then you're either ham fisted and deserve it, or you're pushing waaaay too far for the stock stuff anyway. The (presumably) young guys who are buying 30-35 year old busted arse Jap refugees and thinking they can live the life that was lived by others 20 years ago are deluded. Expectations need to be adjusted somewhat.
    • Just don’t be silly enough to think it’ll never happen either 
    • I take it that you bought the centre to suit the GTR axles? As in there was a plan, not just somehow lucky that it worked? It all looks excellent, by the way.
    • New engine block time. Up to you whether you want to keep going down this road with this project. Unfortunately a lot of these cars are like this. The road to getting these cars into decent shape is long and not fun for reasons that you're discovering. 
    • Essay time. First things first, an RB running stock turbo and boost levels shouldn't get so bad as to stall from reversion if the recirc valve has been deleted. Should get a little fluffy and annoying, but in my experience, not so bad as to stall. Of course, every car is a bit different, so it remains possible that stalling will happen. So, running with no recirc valve is somewhat of an option, for otherwise stock stuff. Atmo BOVs cause all sorts of shit, even on an otherwise stock setup. Only gets worse the higher the boost and the bigger the turbo. At that point you really need to go for a different ECU and no AFM. Rebuilding the stock recirc valve configuration is not hard. You just need a stock or aftermarket BOV with the appropriate adapter for the 2 bolt flange on the back of the J pipe, and to get/make an appropriate ~1" pipe to get the air back to the turbo inlet, and to possibly modify the inlet (if it is not stock) to take the recirc pipe back in. Not hard. Just takes some cutting and welding. Putting an R35 type AFM into the car anywhere is not as simple as just buying the AFM and throwing it in. You will also need to buy the appropriate boss that will then need to be welded onto the pipe where you're installing it. You can clearly see why by looking at the photo posted above. They are not a "simple" swap for a stocker. You can't put on in place of the stock AFM. You can put one in place of the stock AFM, if you get the mounting boss and weld it to some pipe and otherwise make that pipe piece work like the stock AFM housing. Or you can buy such an adapter, either complete with the 4 bolt flange for the air box, or without, for varying degrees of work needed to then make it fit your stock airbox or some pod filter or whatever you have going on. Oh, and the R35 AFM is not plug and play. The wiring is different, but changing that is trivial. The plug is also different so you either end up repinning the original wires onto the new plug, or you just use a short adapter. If you weld a boss to the cold side pipe, the cold side pipe really wants to be 3", otherwise the scaling on the meter can get a bit weird, but whatever the pipe size, it's not as easy as just using the (fully documented in the Nistune doco) simple method for choosing R35 AFM in X" pipe size in the software, because the scaling will already be a bit different. Anyway, all of this has been comprehensively worked through on the Nistune forums, so there is full knowledge available. I would use a Link/Haltech before I would bother putting an AFM into a cold side pipe. That's a lot of effort for a bodge. Nistune is great, can work well even at fairly high power levels, but you are stuck with the limitations of it being the stock ECU, which includes needing to use an AFM, which is not always convenient for every set of modifications. You have to have a think about what you already have, what you want to have, and decide early if you'd be better off jumping ship to an aftermarket ECU. This so you don't waste time and money doing things 2 or 3 times. Never heard of ECUmaster. Sounds like a backyard operation. If there are good tuners for it where you are, and it is a solid product, then it will be fine. We're only talking about an R engine here. Back in the day they all ran on crude nasty early 90s ECUs and they were fine. You don't need a rocket surgeon's ECU to run one.
×
×
  • Create New...