Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Because I am not wholly convinced that AFM are the antichrist and MAP sensors are entirely awesome and because I am not across the detail of the Haltec and don't have a good understanding of the compromises involved in the two options as they relate to the ECU.

The air flow meter is unreliable and as they age, their readings change and change the tune as a result.

They are also slower to react to what the engine is doing as they measure the intake system filling up as well as what the engine is doing, making the throttle slower to react to your foot, as well as basic stuff like when they do die they are $300 each rather then 70 for a map

Oh and there's always they poor person stuck on the side of the road who blew and intercooler hose, cause a map doesn't care and will still be drivable

Well fair enough that is what you don't like about afm's but the question was about how they relate to the ECU that holds it back?

throttle response is a major difference and afms can throw the tune in the wrong cells with reversion, which was and still a major issue the pfc has

So you have fork out $300 every 10 years or so... not a great expense. to a certain point they are just as good as maps if the tuner knows what he is doing and there are a few around that do.

600 but even in your own words "to a certain point, they can be" but they usually aren't
  • Like 1

I think op wants afms so let him have afms. Otherwise all of this will turn into one big argument. A lot of us despise our afms. Especially when the solder joints crack or you have a boost leak or pop a intercooler pipe or the get oily and you have to clean them regularly.

Just keep the pfc. Why do you want to change it if you are not going map? Or eflex?....

I am almost certainly not but the main attraction of a current ECU is probably the ability to easily get data from it and log it in conjunction with a GPS data logger. Makes it easy to get such things as throttle %, rpm, or whatever else into the log without having to do it individually.

But like everyone says the PFC isn't the most refined thing in the world. Was brilliant in 1990, but it isn't 1990 anymore.

I think op wants afms so let him have afms. Otherwise all of this will turn into one big argument. A lot of us despise our afms. Especially when the solder joints crack or you have a boost leak or pop a intercooler pipe or the get oily and you have to clean them regularly.

Just keep the pfc. Why do you want to change it if you are not going map? Or eflex?....

I am the op not djr81

If getting rid of the AFM in preference of a map is recommended then I am all for it,

although I do not understand how it is an advantage if everybody says it is then I will believe them :P

If somebody wishes to explain then I would be grateful (I understand afm could be restriction to intake but I thought since map can only read pressure not flow it would be an advantage to have a AFM)

Jem are the ones initially suggesting I get the Haltec, but I am quite surprised that most people are in agreement I should ditch the PFC.

This could have been an expensive thread :/

I have a zeitronix zt2 wideband data logger for sale at the moment if all you want to do is log data.

250 bucks. Way cheaper than swapping ecu's, but also not as good as you can't log timing.

Edit: response was for djr81 not op.

As for op, it's a big outlay for minimal gains in my opinion.

Edited by Ben C34

Realistically what would I pay for the ECU and recommended sensors?

And what would I get for my PFC and Z32 AFM?

If it ends up costing me under $2k and I get launch control, flat shift, get to ditch the afm with support for e85 in the future as well as better resolution and logging then I am alright with the outlay, but are my expectations realistic?

The closest servo that sells e85 is over 500km away. E85 is not something I am willing to do, but if the ECU is compatible it is a bonus for future proofing my build. Would $2k be enough for Haltec after selling PFC? (Not including tune)

Basically the biggest thing you'll find when tuning a car is that a tuner needs as much accuracy as possible to tune the car. He's going to be pushing the motor pretty hard in some cases and if he can't fully trust the AFM this will definitely hold back the tune.


The other thing about these modern ECU's is that they have things like Long Term Fuel Trim, which essentially 'learns' where the ecu is running rich or lean when its being driven and then compensates for it. So if they are receiving incorrect signals about air, they will alter the tune and could become rubbish or your engine could show you a fireworks display, featuring pistons

Or you can look at it this way, your fitting a computer with 2014 technology in it and using technology designed in 1989 as your main load signal

Not exactly a fair point as most OEM management systems rely on AFMs. Doesn't matter what sort of AFM, so don't bother carrying on about flappy doors, vortex counters and all that. Hot wire AFMs are actually one of the better methods. Measuring load directly, as opposed to inferring it indirectly (by MAP) is actually a far more sound engineering practice.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Biggest thing is you're okay!   It sounds like between the accident, and the drive home, it was a pretty torturous trip again! On the bright side, you took the opportunity to enjoy the event more from the perspective of a spectator, than as an entrant!   Sad to see so much damage to the car. It really has taken a HUGE hit in the front end. If/when you choose to repair, hopefully the rails are straight (At least from shock tower backwards). Hopefully the extra cage coming through there has save most of the chassis rails, and HOPEFULLY saved the motor too. Best of luck when you eventually get motivated to start pulling it down to check it all out
    • Sounds more like what Brad said, that it's mainly transfer. What pad bed in procedure did you use, and did you replace/machine the rotors, or just swap pads?
    • The stutter is almost entirely in the pedal. I don't feel the brakes release and reapply as you would with ABS engaging but the pedal feels that way, without the brakes releasing. It only lasts for less than a second and the pedal is fine again. It's hard to explain, sorry.  I'll get under this weekend and just double check everything is tight. Fluid is at max where I left it.
    • What bedding in procedure did you use?   When you say stutter, what exactly do you mean? Like it feels like someone letting go of the brakes momentarily and regrabbing them again to get you to stop? Re-reading your post, and that is what it kind of makes me think you're explaining, like theres a little bit of a jolt, likely just as you're reaching a stop. I've only had this issue once. And if its caused by what caused mine, you will want to get the car up on stands again and check it over. Mine was a case of a caliper mounting bolt coming out and letting the caliper rotate on the other remaining bolt and gave play in a wheel as it came to a stop. But not every stop either!
    • Yeop... binned it   This will be a summary will not many pics atm and cbf  Fixed the samsonas - it was totally munched Put a new precision 7675 T4 on with proper split pulse mani Got to Sydney to get to car - drove to canberra to get racecar - drive back to sydney that night Next day all day at Plasmaman putting on new clamps cleaning some things up and adding another large engine oil cooler sitting at the rear above diffuser to keep things cooler Next day - Tuesday - on Dyno - killer wikid awesome pumped out really good numbers - more mid range and on lower boost levels Wednesday - first prac - all day again getting the suspension right - had to borrow front suspension again - out do a lap come in - out do a lap - in - what i had just couldnt handle the load at the more consistent higher speeds - got a lap in at the end of the day that was pretty reasonable  Put it this way that lap wouldve had me in 4th in Pro am for the whole event - with only 700 hp and used tyres Thurs first official prac day - lap out warm up - then entered a hotlap with above setting and 80% effort took corners 1,2,3 and into 4 car felt awesome -  rear came around out of nowhere bang into the wall near front on at whatever 140 kmph Done, over, gone Just one of those how did that happen apparently as all indications show nothing out of the ordinary Got to spend the rest of the time at the event like I hadnt done before - was actually Ok mainly as I had my family and my boy is 9 and got treated like a rockstar Long trip home, lost a trailer wheel in nowhere land, X5 airbag suspension gave up half way across nullabour and rode on bumps stops (its now completely fine) had to do a 19 hr drive day on day 3 as accommodation got screwed up so just had to keep driving till found a town with some Now to reassess - hopefully the motor and other things are OK but yet to be seen too. There is no easy fix there is no i'll just order that part and get it sent - we'll have a talk to people see what can happen and what the go is but at minimum its rebuild from scratch struts forward and alot of time effort and $ should and if I return and if but maybe/ when  I have the cage tied into the front strut towers - if I didnt have that things couldnt been worse you can say its just a front end but if you know what goes into these cars... you'll know what that actually means in reality   Car was very fast. Disappointing we just didnt get to show it Effort doesnt win you races though     Apparently this is motorsport !  
×
×
  • Create New...