Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I found the stock specs of the NEO turbo cams, they aren't to bad from factory, I'd start at 7 deg advanced on intake and 5 deg retarded on exhaust and tune from there

Otherwise the 252s would be better for response then the 260s

Just realised you have VCT on inlet so no adjusting there :(

I found the stock specs of the NEO turbo cams, they aren't to bad from factory, I'd start at 7 deg advanced on intake and 5 deg retarded on exhaust and tune from there

Otherwise the 252s would be better for response then the 260s

Just realised you have VCT on inlet so no adjusting there :(

Pretty sure ben has a way of easily adjusting intake cam on neo that im going to look into, How do you feel the 252s would affect midrange and response?

34geeteetee is making 395rwkw with the factory cams in his r34, so really you should save your money and put it towards something more useful

I am under the impression he is using tomei B cams? He is also using E85 which is not an option for me.

It is not a case of saving money or not, i have already purchased type B cams, springs, retainers shims etc.. If it is going to make an Improvement then i might as well do it, but if it is going to be considered a performance Decrease then i should bin the cams for something more suitable.

Perhaps i should start a new thread so i don't derail OP's any further. I am looking more for NEO, specific advise, im not convinced results from rb25 or r33 rb25 would mimic results of the neo

You will see a 10kw gain in the top the issue is will you lose anything in the bottom end and how much!

Cause you'll be surprised the difference losing power from the bottom of the range makes to the overall driving experience

And seriously 10kw can be had by screwing in another 1-2psi of boost and is a lot cheaper that way

  • Like 1

34geeteetee is making 395rwkw with the factory cams in his r34, so really you should save your money and put it towards something more useful

I need to check that.

I'm 99 percent sure he is using type b cams and has raved about them.

Edited by Ben C34
Peak Power Comparison

(for Stock Cat. Equiped Cars)

TYPE A 405 ps
TYPE B 406.33 ps
TYPE R 404.65 ps

So at just over 400ps you make under 2hp less but some on here say lag can improve by 800rpm... I wonder what the difference in power is like at 700ps and 8500rpm

I currently have Grex (Trust) drop in cams that came with the car, as far as I'm aware they came in either 256/256 or 264/264 9.1. Always pondered how much I would kill top end power with the Tomei Type-R, can always do with more midrange :)

Edited by SimonR32

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't know if you can disassemble the thing and put it backwards for different ramp rates. They're both "2 ways" or both "1.5 ways" because well, 2 ways and 1.5 ways are the same 'thing' I do not know for sure, but I believe the 38420-RSS15-B5 is the 1 way, and 38420-RSS20-B5 is the two way. In other words, I predict Nissan considers this: to be a 1.5 way. No idea what actually happens when it arrives/you disassemble it. It would be an excellent question to ask Nismo directly! I somehow doubt you will get an answer though, I feel you would be the first person to document what you encounter when you open the box and the internet would be grateful.
    • I'm going to slap an old nismo logo sticker on my spare one and sell it to the land of the free for a thousand bucks
    • lol, probably should have read further!
    • Well - they have arrived.  And they are easy on the eye to put it mildly... These only have three bolts - but for a start there is a key that fits with vacuum like precision..  And as you can see by my ruler, the interface is large..   I listened to a podcast on HP Academy about Dan (KiwiCNC) and I'm more than comfortable he knows what he is doing. R35 Bearing assembly should arrive later today so can mock that up for a look. Can't wait to get these on and get some brake pressure logging too. IMG_3860.MP4
    • I would be very confident that they are the same parts (the 2 different SKUs). It seems very clear that you can drop the cam in the 2-way opening, or in the other opening. If you arrange it in the other opening in the same way that you see any other 1-way diff, ie, with the flat of the cam up against the 1° side of the opening, then it would work as a 1-way. It can only spread the ramps when driving forwards - cannot spread the ramps on overrun. It would then appear obvious that if you put the cam into the opening "backwards", that you would get the angled flats of the cam working onto the "points" of the 1° side of the opening, which would give you ramp spread in both loading directions. I do wonder if the forward direction of the 1.5-way config is equivalent to the forward direction of the 2-way, seeing as the cams are flipped and the angled surfaces on those would need to be the same on each side - AND - clearly when installed in either the 2-way or 1-1ay configuration they are not intended to work exactly the same (the ramp angles on the 2-way are 10° different between forward and backward, and the ramp doesn't exist in the 1-way config). 'twere me, I think I would rather actually have a set of rings that offered the 2-way with two different sets of ramp angles, say the 55/45 of the existing design and maybe a 45/37.5 combo for a less aggressive effect), AND another set of rings with a dedicated 1.5-way opening and a dedicated 1-way opening. The 1.5-way opening would actually have the steeper angle on the overdrive side that causes it to be less pushy than the forward drive angle, like you see in many other diffs. But really - if this Nismo thing is thought out properly and all those surfaces work on each other the way that they need to, who am I to argue?
×
×
  • Create New...