Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just filled up the rb25 silvia ive got and found out its doing over 17L per 100kms. This is just gentle driving around the suburbs, no highway, so that could partially explain it, but its still off the scale.

Would a dyno tune help diagnose the problem?

Possibly oxygen sensor? Is it possible to test the o2 sensor without just buying another and seeing if it works better?

Considering the silvia weighs a couple hundred kilos less than a skyline, fuel consumption should be even better one would assume, so im keen to try and work out what the problem with this is.

91 Silvia Q's with Rb25DET (from '96 R33 afaik)

RB25 gbox

2.5" exhaust

Boxed pod filter

Running 10psi vis bleed valve

FMIC (600x300x65)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/45327-17l100kms-with-rb25-solution/
Share on other sites

ill check the fuel pressure hopefully sometime next week.

as for o2 sensor, ive read different places where you can get cheaper ones (from falcon or something?) that work just as good?

also ill reset the ecu tonight - didnt think of that till now, but it may help?

EL Ford O2 sensor, from petroject cost me $80. The plug is different, as are the pins, so you need to swap them.

I couldnt get the solder to take to the OEM sensor wires, so had to remove the pins from the plug, cut the wires and solder directly to the pins.

Either that or $184 from nissan.

I went from 250ks to a full tank to 350ks odd (i got 380 once) by changing the 02 sensor

its only supposed to last 40,000 ks according to nissan. i had mine replaced at 95,000 (odd) and it was the factory unit still. so i had 55,000 odd ks of a dead o2 sensor and bad fuel economy

the sole purpose of the o2 sensor is to give feedback to the ECU so it can lean out the fuel mixture

Geez, I'm starting to feel a bit better now (I'm not the only one)!!

I presume you're running the standard ECU. I'm running a similar setup to yours in my R33, with the addition of a Microtech LT12.

Up until a couple of weeks ago, I was consuming about 20.5L/100km driving it like a hurse!! Had it in my head that it should be returning more like 11-12L/100km.

Had some fine tuning done on the dyno last week and tonight I've returned 16.1L/100km with quite a few WOT blasts. Am pleasantly relieved that it's improved, but I'm not sure whether I can realistically expect much better at this stage. My car is currently putting out about 165rwkw, so I guess that this rate of consumption is not so unreasonable, it's just not what I'm used to.

However there are blokes out there running much higher outputs and claim to be running better economy than this!? What's the story guys? How is it so?

I definitely thought that a standard ECU would return much better economy than mine as the Microtech doesn't have a "closed loop" circuit to reduce consumption at idle and on steady throttle.

perhaps the dyno tune helped reduce it, but a new o2 sensor may help more?

does consult on the ecu (brother who works at nissan thinks they may have consult computer thingy) tell u much, eg would u be able to tell from it if the o2 sensor is dead?

this is readout from consult. are ECU's made as either MT or AT? if so, i think i may have a AT ecu

ticket reads:

SYSTEM: A/T

DATE: 07/11/2004 17:50:37

P/#: 31036 - 52F00

SELF-DIAG RESULTS

DTC RESULTS

THROTTLE POSI SEN

T/C CLUTCH SOL/V

LINE PRESSURE S/V

OVERRUN CLUTCH S/V

turns out my o2 sensor had short circuited or something internally (resistance ~ 8 ohms), and melted the insultation off one of the wires, then melted the wire.

so guess ill be needing a new o2 sensor

does the EL Ford one fit the same thread? if so does anyone know how it's wired up?

im not sure, it seems that most people are of the opinion that if the ford el sensor (3 wire) fits the thread, then u can use it.

try unscrew urs, then put it back in (not too hard) then go down to repco, unscrew it (bring wet cloth), and take it to the counter and compare it with the el ford one?

btw my fuel consumption is down to 13L/100kms from 15 and 17 last two times i filled, was hoping for less though. i think my ecu might be an auto one so perhaps something to do with that?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • On BMWs what I do because I'm more confident that I can't instantly crush the pinch welds and do thousands of USD in chassis damage is use a set of rubber jacking pads designed to protect the chassis/plastic adapter and raise a corner of the car, place the aforementioned 2x12 inch wooden planks under a tire, drop the car, then this normally gives me enough clearance to get to the front central jack point. If you don't need it to be a ramp it only needs to be 1-1.5 feet long. On my R33 I do not trust the pinch welds to tolerate any of this so I drive up on the ramps. Before then when I had to get a new floor jack that no longer cleared the front lip I removed it to get enough clearance to put the jack under it. Once you're on the ramps once you simply never let the car down to the ground. It lives on the ramps or on jack stands.
    • Nah. You need 2x taps for anything that you cannot pass the tap all the way through. And even then, there's a point in response to the above which I will come back to. The 2x taps are 1x tapered for starting, and 1x plug tap for working to the bottom of blind holes. That block's port is effectively a blind hole from the perspective of the tap. The tapered tap/tapered thread response. You don't ever leave a female hole tapered. They are supposed to be parallel, hence the wide section of a tapered tap being parallel, the existince of plug taps, etc. The male is tapered so that it will eventually get too fat for the female thread, and yes, there is some risk if the tapped length of the female hole doesn't offer enough threads, that it will not lock up very nicely. But you can always buzz off the extra length on the male thread, and the tape is very good at adding bulk to the joint.
    • Nice....looking forward to that update
    • Neg, the top one is actually for the front. The sizes are 18x10.5 +18 and 18x11 +32.   I measured many times but I'm sure I'll have problems as this is the thread for problems.
    • Just one thing; tapping tapered threads is tricky. Taps are always tapered and you would generally run it as far as you can, but with a tapered thread you have to stop much sooner otherwise the wide part of the taper will run in too far and you will have to thread the sensor in too far too as well (possible that it will never make a good seal) BTW nice wide wheels, I guess the top one is for the back!
×
×
  • Create New...