Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am nearing completion of my build and need to decide on a turbo. I have narrowed it to a few choices and would like some feedback on my selection and math (because garrett boost advisor and BW match-bot programs slightly differ in recommendations).

Engine is the following:

BC stroker on stock N1 bores = 2.75L

9:1 CR

SS BC valves oversized +0.5mm intake and exhaust

Ported cylinder head (nice smooth setup...nothing crazy)

Tomei Poncam A's

Divided T4 tubular manifold

Haltech Platinum PnP ECU

850cc injectors

Tomei oil pump

Greddy Sump

Side drains for pan (2x -10 lines to breather, etc).

Car is R32 GTR and is street car with plans to track on occasion. Pump gas most likely all I will run which is "93 octane" here (98 RON?)

BW 8374 EFR 1.05 AR

Match bot shows Boost comes on strong at 3200, and 532 HP at 7500 rpms

BW 8374 S300SX .91AR

Again extremely similar numbers to the 8374 EFR with exception of the ability of the compressor to come on earlier?! With the .91 AR housing and the shallower compressor map, this should make 16 psi boost at 3000 rpms. Technically this should be a better combo for 532 BHP?

Am I missing something between these plots because I was assuming the EFR would have made more HP on top end?

BW EFR 9180 1.05 AR

15 psi boost at 3800 rpms. At 20 psi now a 50 HP gain making 580 BHP.

(Next post will be Garrett Turbos).

Edited by HarrisRacing
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/455509-bc-stroker-275l-turbo-choices/
Share on other sites

I have this kit (essentially, but its on a Neo)

I use a GTX3076R (.82ar)

It's very responsive. It makes about 407kw for a manual on E85. (but at 21psi, may be reachable on 98)

I would say a better fit is probably a GTX3582, but of course it depends on the application of the car, supporting mods, and all that jazz.

If I had the balls and didn't live in Victoria, I'd probably use a Precision 6466 if I didn't have to consider the local arm of the law.

If your never planning on running E85 then you should consider lowering the compression closer to 8-8.5:1. This will allow you to run those larger turbo's at least a bit closer to 1.5kg/cm without hitting the knock limit.

There is little point in running a huge turbo when you can't boost it more than 1kg/cm boost with it, that is unless you want that big turbo for visual appearance, and don't care about the combined lag and lower power level.

Dude sorry to burst your bubble, but you are not going to make 16psi by 3000rpm with an 83/74.. Especially with that size engine on that fuel. 3500rpm would be a good result for 16 pound in my opinion

Though I do agree the 83/74 with the smaller turbo is your best option for power and response

Hi All, I have removed the posts about legalities of cars in the States. Please stay on topic in here.

If you want to chat about legalities and importing, you could always start a thread in the new US forum.

  • Like 1

Dude sorry to burst your bubble, but you are not going to make 16psi by 3000rpm with an 83/74.. Especially with that size engine on that fuel. 3500rpm would be a good result for 16 pound in my opinion

Though I do agree the 83/74 with the smaller turbo is your best option for power and response

Thanks and I totally agree. I must be using some bad VE numbers. More than likely I am too high on the VE at the low rpms and too low on the high rpms. I'm trying to reverse engineer other people's graphs to see what to expect for VE. The calcs in match-bot display HP in flywheel HP, and NONE of my calcs come close to some of the numbers that others have hit on pumpgas. Very curious to see what Geoff or others would use for VE on an RB26DETT that's stroked and ported.

Here is the latest model that I have for an 8374 EFR in the match-bot software.

I'm using RPM, VE, Boost, calc'd HP as follows:

3200 rpm, 90%, 15 psi, 254HP

3500 rpm, 90%, 21 psi, 313HP

4500 rpm, 110%, 21 psi, 444HP

6000 rpm, 110%, 21 psi, 561 HP

7500 rpm, 105%, 21 psi, 623 HP

8500 rpm, 100%, 21 psi, 613 HP

I guess the question is, if you plot this in excel, does it look like a good graph. Match-bot shows that the turbine and the compressor on this engine (90% VE at 3200 rpm) should make the 15 psi boost no problem BUT Theory and practice are only the same in theory...not in practice.

I reverse engineered some 2.6L VE numbers and came up with the following:

RPM - VE

3000 - 72

3500 - 72

4000 - 80

4500 - 100

5000 - 111

5500 - 117

6000 - 120

6500 - 121

7000 - 121

7500 - 118

8000 - 115

These numbers support some dynos that prove that the 8375 turbo is maxxed out at ~68 lbs/min airflow. It also supports the boost threshold of such setups. I am assuming this setup had CAMS.

If I use these VE numbers, my estimated 2.75L HP dyno comes up as attached on pump gas and 21 psi boost by 4k rpms and dropping to 18-17 range above 7500 on the 8375 and .91 housing.

Feel free to play with my Match-bots:

low rpms

high rpms

post-136202-0-92008700-1428876307_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-17774600-1428876317_thumb.jpg

Edited by HarrisRacing

And here is the 8375 .91 AR twin scroll at 21psi (dropping to 17) VS. the 8374 EFR IWG .92 AR twin scroll turbo which can hold 21 psi to my redline. As you can see they are almost IDENTICAL in spool and power with exception of the EFR being able to support the extra flow (74 lbs / min) on the top end and carrying 21 psi all the way to redline of 8500 rpms. Pretty much projected to make 50 whp more from 7500-8500 from the little extra push from the compressor.

Again these are pumpgas projections on low boost (21 psi max). On my stroker motor I DEFINITELY give the nod to the 8374 EFR on .92. On a 2.6L, however, it didn't make this much difference!

Shame of it all is that if the 8375 was offered with the same turbine as the 8374EFR, I think the 8375 (cast) would matche the 8374 EFR almost identically at 18 psi (or lower) on 2.6L.

8375 results from match-bot are in post above.

2.75L 8374 EFR .92 IWG T4 divided matchbot results:

low rpm

high rpm

I know I'm replying to myself, but I still think I'm trying to offer solutions for some of the stroker guys out there.

post-136202-0-30760600-1428960772_thumb.jpg

Added a comparison of the following:

2.75L engine

8375 cast compressor w/ .91 AR T4 housing (76mm turbine, 60mm compressor)

8374 EFR w/ .92 IWG (74mm turbine, 61.4 billet compressor)

7670 EFR w/ .92 IWG (70mm turbine, 57mm billet compressor)

One graph at 19 psi the other at 21. Both the 8375 and the 7670 EFR are out of breath on this motor at high rpms and cannot sustain the boost. Still for a $600 turbo, the 8375 is really showing how nice it is, but the 8374 EFR is still the king of the powerband on this setup.

One thing to note...I also compared the new FMW (billet) compressors in the Airwerks turbo with these and found exterme similarities between them. I'm SURE the EFR's are better and spool better and transient response is better, but the compressor and turbine maps plot extermely similar to the following:

7670 EFR .92 IWG = S200SX 57mm FMW w/ 1.00 (or maybe .88) housing

8374 EFR .92 IWG = S300SX 62mm FMW w/ .91 AR

Basically there are your journal bearing comparisons. But after you add the Wastegate and recirc valve, you are getting back up in the ballpark of EFR's and might as well get the technology.

So the comparison is starting to show for me:

8374 EFR .92 IWG ~ $2300

S300SX FMW 62 w/ .91 EWG ~ $1150 + $400 wg + $150 BOV = 1700

S300SX cast 60mm w/ .91 EWG ~$600 + $400 wg + $150 BOV = 1150

post-136202-0-68332500-1429082097_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-93499600-1429082108_thumb.jpg

Edited by HarrisRacing

Decided to go with Geoff's advice from Full-Race. Even though I'm on relatively small cams, Match bot and real results agree that the EFR 8374 with IWG .92 housing should be an incredible street turbo.

the deciding factor was an Ebay auction that popped up and I snatched the turbo in seconds. I will not tell what I bought it for, but it is $600 less than I have ever seen advertised which seems insane to me...and it was a 100% ebayer with the correct BW part number: 179357.

We will see if it shows up next Tuesday.

now to find a header that fits R32 accessories.

Patrick

I wonder how close the 83/74 and 83/75 are in frame size dimensions.

If it was a direct bolt in it would be my upgrade option for sure when the time came.

Maybe Geoff could answer this if he's hanging around

I wonder how close the 83/74 and 83/75 are in frame size dimensions.

If it was a direct bolt in it would be my upgrade option for sure when the time came.

Maybe Geoff could answer this if he's hanging around

Doesn't look anywhere close to direct bolt in from the dimensions from their catalog. Looks like the EFR is significantly larger, plus that strange offset housing with no dimension? And the fact that there is no clearance dimension from the wastegate canister.

That being said, I do see that the journal FMW is the same dimensions and is a worthy swap if just trying to get more top end. I'd bet the front housing and wheel are all you'd need and I do recall reading a post where Geoff says that all BW setups are individual component balanced so you can just swap the front wheel and cover without need for complete balancing (I could be mistaken there...I have been reading a ton of turbo stuff lately).

Sure would be a cool back to back dyno comparison just showing what swapping a compressor wheel would do! (hint).

Hope this helps.

post-136202-0-90641900-1429585417_thumb.jpg

Edited by HarrisRacing

Yes I do remember him saying the same thing about balancing components. It would be a great comparison but I'm sick of not being able to drive my car so what I have will do for now. Cheers for the info mate!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...