Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys and girls,

After assembling my rb26 for the 2nd time now after bearing woes...she's gone again. Lasted maybe 20hours of run time. Mains are gone. I'd say it needs a line bore, and the crank is already 30' under so I'd need a new one.

My thoughts are this- have the block reconditioned, line bore, new crank and any machining necessary.

Or do I go n1 block and new crank? N1 block is the best part of $3000 and would require a bore to 86.5mm to suit my forged pistons.

Cost effectiveness? Do I just buy a 2.8stroker and sell my existing forged rotating assy or have my block machined and stay 2.6

Has anybody made this decision and could perhaps steer me in the right direction. I'd like to go 2.8 but it seems reasonably pricey, but if it's going to cost me an arm and a leg for machining the stock block+ new crank I'll go 2.8.

How much did machining cost you? What did u do? What would you consider next time?

Mods, rb26- billet n1 pump

- baffles

- head drain, restrictor

- trust oil cooler.

-forged 2.6

-264 hks cams and hks2540 lag king turbos.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/456257-rb26-spins-another-set-of-bearings/
Share on other sites

You don't build a 2.6, it's a pointless exercise IMO. Put a stocker in it and run it. If you want more capacity and it's benefits then prepare for a very expensive exercise.

Of you do decide to do a stroker, I'd be finding out the reason why the two engines before hand failed. That or give the assembly job to someone who knows what they're doing. It wouldn't happen for just no reason and you don't want it to happen to an expensive 2.8 rotating assembly.

Get rid of those woeful turbos too.

Well I already have the forged rotating assy in the car. Not that it's needed at my power level, I bought the car with spun bearings, got crank straightened, checked clearances 1.5thou, crank runout. Plastiguage etc. no dice. I think I'll remove the motor, have a shop look over it and stay 2.6, maybe pick up some 2530s (the 2540s do nothing until 5500rpm.)

Did you suggest buying a secondhand short block when you said building a 2.6 is pointless??

I appreciate the feedback. Thank you

What I mean by building a 2.6 is a waste of time is this.

If you need a new crank, rods and pistons plus paying someone to screw it together and allllll the costs (oil and water pumps, gaskets blah blah) what's the difference in cost of going a bigger bottom end? The bigger bottom end will be a little more exxy, sure. But the end result is so much better. (Some would argue it doesn't sound as good or whatever they dribble on about but that's another debate).

Now, being low mounts (say 2530's or so) and say you cap power at 350 - 380 kw and not spin it to the moon (7000-7500 max rpm), why do you need to build it?

The lasts two attempts have failed. You would have been better off whacking a stocker in it, getting it tuned and away you go. Odds are it would have lasted ALOT longer and driven exactly the same (save for compression differences which wont make a night and day difference anyway)

Ahh okay, perhaps I find a stock long block. And swap my billet pump out. Would YOU go to the trouble of fresh bearings, fitting my oil restrictor and a decent headgasket? Or just run with it and stay under 380? After thinking about stroking and the costs I'm a little turned off by the idea.

Newcastle. If you think it would be fine then I'll just do the oil pump and drop it in. I guess I'm just scared of the (probably overstated) rb26 oiling issues. I guess there are plenty of stock rb26s without baffles, billet pumps, head drains and restrictors getting around, I have all that and an oil cooler and look where I am.

FYI when I bought my first stock 33 gtr engine, we pulled the sump off to out tomei baffles in, so while it open we put new standard size bearings in for piece of mind, can be done but depends how far you want do go with a stocker

arp headstuds with stock gasket is a good idea if running over 20-22psi

Yeah well it's probably an hours extra work for bearings. Can't hurt. Probably cheaper than a full strip down on my block. I'll make a few calls and see what costs will be. The new crank alone is $800+ I saw a long block go for $1000 this week on sau. Seems like good value to me

Nitto the r34 was making over 600kw from memory on the standard bottom end r34 engine before the oil pump went. If you get an r33 engine in good nick and fit headstuds it will probably last for years with heaps of boost dialled in

Gtr700 had 580awkw on stock motor before they went wild with it. Only blew it up by accidentally downshifting and overevving. I have a billet n1 pump gear set so I'm sure I can make it work

  • Like 1

No warrantee on the shop build?

Any idea what caused the failure?

What oil were you using and how far up the dipstick was it filled to?

What was the driving conditions when it went? (track/dragstrip/street fang/street cruise, rpm)

There's no doubt that oiling issues DO exist in these engines, but I agree they are case by case.

My engine (as received) had 5 spun crank mains and 2 rods as well. Also the crank was bent beyond repair and I'm not a fan of grinding cranks in high revving long cranks anyway so that was out.

That being said, I think these factory built engines with the "fit bearings to the OD of crank and ID of rod" style of sizing almost dictates a "tighter" tolerance than most builds. Tighter tolerance = less oil lossage out of the bearing surfaces, which equates to the ability to use a smaller oil pump. So after 90% of us rebuild with standard bearings or a little looser tolerance (from polishing burrs from crank, or in your case oversized), then I think the issue is that the factory oil pump starts to fall out of being able to supply the correct VOLUME of oil feeding the bearings (loose bearings need more flow). The head restrictor keeps you close to keeping volume on the crank by reducing what is going up to the head and of course all other baffles, etc, just keep oil to the bearings in general. If you had a continuing starvation problem on track, I would lean towards baffles, breathing, etc, but I think there was something up with the rebuilds (looser tolerances, crank not retaining straightness, etc).

That being said, I am a big fan of the larger oil pump volumes in these engines. But I'd also have to recommend: deeper sump, more oil separation, etc...because the bigger pumps will pump the pan dry on factory setups (at least the Tomei oil pump installation manual says this).

I don't know if the billet gears you have supply any additional flow, but I would be looking into a replacement with a higher flowing pump if doing a rebuild and DEFINITELY looking for a factory replacement crank.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Has equal chance of cleaning an AFM and f**king an AFM. I think you can work out what happened. When the Hitachi ECU sees the AFM die and goes into the associated limp mode, then it will start and run just fine, because it ignores the AFM and just runs on idle maps that will do what it needs to get it going. But there is no proper load signal, so that's about all it can do. My suggestion? If you don't want to go full aftermaket ECU, then get some R35 GTR AFM cards and some housings to put them in, in the stock location, and Nistune the ECU. Better to do a good upgrade than just replace shitty 40 year old tech with the same 40 year old tech.
    • So my car was recently having trouble starting on initial crank, I would need to feather the gas for it to start up but besides that it would start and run fine. So I clicked the idle air control valve (with throttle body cleaner) and cleaned the MAF sensors (with MAF cleaner). The start up issue was fixed and now the car turns over without the assist of the throttle, but the car is in limp mode and wont rev past 2.5k RPM. From what I understand the IACV would not put the car in limp mode, so I am to believe it is the MAF sensors, but it was running fine before and now I cant get it out of limp mode. I cleaned the MAF made sure the o rings were seated properly. Made sure the cables were plugged in properly, the cables also both read the same voltage. Does anybody know why this is or what could be causing this or how to get it out of limp mode?
    • Ooo I might actually come and bring the kids, however will leave the shit box home and take the daily
    • Thanks. Yeah I realised that there's no way I'd be able to cover the holes with the filler, it would just fall through. Thanks again @GTSBoy!
    • That was the reason I asked. If you were going to be fully bodge spec, then that type of filler is the extreme bodge way to fill a large gap. But seeing as you're going to use glass sheet, I would only use that fibre reinforced filler if there are places that need a "bit more" after you've finished laying in the sheet. Which, ideally, you wouldn't. You might use a blob of it underneath the sheet, if you need to provide some support from under to keep the level of your sheet repair up as high as it needs to be, to minimise the amount of filler you need on top. Even though you're going bodge spec here, using glass instead of metal, the same rules apply wrt not having half inch deep filler on the top of the repair. Thick filler always ends up shitting the bed earlier than thin filler.
×
×
  • Create New...