Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

now I've searched and come up with nothing, surely this has been discussed and its my search techniques that need improvement.

Have an aftermarket fuel pressure regulator and I'm just after what the fuel pressure should be at idle?!

Cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/457099-rb26-fuel-pressure/
Share on other sites

At idle it changes depending on the vac generated, hence why the base pressure is always set with the vac line disconnected. Should be around 40-45psi, depending how much boost you want to run. At idle the pressure will likely drop to 35-40psi once you hook the vac line back onto the reg.

so standard turbos with the restrictor removed running 13psi approx. you would think around 40-45psi should be fine!?

Note it actually has nothing to do with the state of your turbos or boost level that you are running or planning to run right now. What matters is that the pressure should be set to the same base as your stock regulator, which is notionally 43 psi which is right in the middle of that 40-45 psi range. Anywhere close to 43 should be fine.

If you choose to set it anywhere else (say 50 psi to allow for more hectic boost levels) then you will overfuel everywhere unless the ECU is retuned to suit. The opposite is also true.

The ability to set the base pressure somewhere other than stock is only useful for those who are planning to run more boost, coupled with at least some of, but probably all of the following list. Injectors, ECU, pump, lines, surge tank, etc etc.

GTSBoy is on the money, I just assumed you had an aftermarket ecu, as otherwise there is no point to change the reg.

Run high boost and you may need to drop your fuel pressure, as most pumps drop off badly in flow after 70-80psi.

thanks guys.

have nistune ecu, I won't get into it but the previous owner for some reason purchased large injectors, aftermarket fuel rail and adj. FPR. :no::angry:

I just want to make sure the base fuel pressure is right.

Thanks again.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...