Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 89
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

RE: the deposit

If I was the seller I would not find it unreasonable if someone requested their deposit back after discovering the car was not as I had advertised (ie mechanical fault, signs of crash repairs or dodgy modifications)

If I was the buyer in the above situation I would certainly argue my point that it should be refunded.

You should note that leaving a deposit is usually not necessary, and if the dealer wants something you give them a token 50 - 100 bucks maximum.

Expect to lose that if the deal falls through but always ask for it back in case the dealer momentarily loses his marbles.

I dont understand why you forked over so much cash as a deposit....

RE: the deposit

If I was the seller I would not find it unreasonable if someone requested their deposit back after discovering the car was not as I had advertised (ie mechanical fault, signs of crash repairs or dodgy modifications)

If I was the buyer in the above situation I would certainly argue my point that it should be refunded.

Well that would depend on whether the seller had claimed in his advertisement, or by spoken word that the engine was in perfect health, and it was later discovered that it wasn't. In *THAT* case, then the deposit should be refunded as the product was not as advertised.

BUT if the potential buyer simply changes his/her mind, cannot find the necessary funds, loses his licence, finds out something about the car he/she didn't like/whatever... Deposit should not be returned. That's the whole point of a deposit. The potential buyer should have ensured the car was to his/her prefect liking before putting a deposit down on the car.

As sewid said, the potential buyer did NOT have to leave a deposit. Doing so is a sign to the seller that the buyer is genuinely interested in buying the car, and wishes the seller to take the car off the market. The deposit is security for the seller in case the buyer pulls out and he loses another potential buyer that he has told that the car is no longer on the market.

That's the whole point of a deposit. If you expect your money back just because it fails a compression test, you're being unreasonable and don't understand the whole point of a deposit. The only time you should get your deposit back is if the car is not in the condition stated by the seller.

Oh, and zymotic... Anything over 150-ish is pretty decent.

The main thing is even compression across the cylinders... Don't be worried if it only manages 150 across the board and not 180 compression.

What you should be worried about is this:

180 175 180 110 170 180

or

160 90 155 165 160 85

Notice a large difference in compressions in a couple of those cylinders? That's what you should be looking for... That's a bad sign :thumbsup:

Oh, and zymotic... Anything over 150-ish is pretty decent.

eek, i thought the lower the number the better? :uhh:

when i had one done it came up to around 125 accross the board and they said this was better than usual

then again when i got it done elsewhere they were around 150 so cant really tell which is accurate but as least they're consistant.

re: the problem of the smoke... the people who are saying it could be steam, is this also possible as he has said it also happened at warm after idling for 10 mins, i thought white steam was fine at startup and warmup but any other time might not be so cool...

Jim

Thanks Guys,

Merli in particular for that excellent reply. Now I've got some good ammunition to make my decision following the comp test/inspection.

The dealer assured me word of mouth only that the engine was healthy and that the white smoke was due to car being washed.

I will attempt to get my deposit back if the mechanicals are poor as per the inspection, due to the fact that he stated clearly that the engine was good.

1 1/2 hrs in theory till the inspection I will keep u guys appraised of developments.

Results are in on compression test:

1 = 180

2 = 175

3 = 170

4 = 175

5 = 175

6 = 180

Oil is old needs changing.

Air filters need recharging.

1 tyre has a slo leak.

Needs new wiperblades.

Few cracks on spoiler.

No smoke was evident during idle or under load during road test and the car behaved normally.

Looks like I might be owning a blue whale instead. Provided the REVS check is clear.

Merli, could u check your private messages please :cheers:

I'm one confused chap.

Zy dont be so happy just because the engine is fine, you gotta worry about the chassis/running gear.

dont forget what N/A was saying, i totaly understand EXACTLY was he is sayin.

you gotta worry about the chassis/running gear.

The same can be said for many a car. Especially, GTR's coming in from Japan. At least here I gave it a good going over and then had a pro inspection and comp test. Thats a good start.

I don't know what else I'm supposed to do pull the entire car apart and check each piece?

I'm confused with the REVS check etc nothing else. Trying to iron out the numbers.

OMG it needs new wiper blades!!! Better clean out the slush fund :cheers:

Compression is very good, nice and even and fairly high too, w00t :) Sounds like at least the engine is in decent condition, if you're happy with the rest of the car then it looks like you may well have found a bargain, congratulations. Bastard.

Provided REVS works out & I buy the car (looks like it) I'll c if I can post some pics.

Its a bit on the bling, bling side with the bonnet vents and pins. I like the side skirts and front bar but might trade that bonnet in for a standard one. I kind of dig the clean sleeper look. I'm too old for bling bling rice (Reminds me to remove nismo sticker from boot).

Is it possible to powerdercoat silver mags to make them gunmetal. Is this expensive?

Firsts things first though - straighten that panel and get a good alarm. Oh and change the oil with some HQ synth, buy and use a K&N filter recharge kit, fix slo leak, and most importantly replace the wiper blades :cheers:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • our good friends at nismo make a diff for it, I have one (and a spare housing to put the centre in) on the way. https://www.nismo.co.jp/products/web_catalogue/lsd/mechanical_lsd_v37.html AMS also make a helical one, but I prefer mechanical for track use in 2wd (I do run a quaife in the front, but not rear of the R32)
    • What are we supposed to be seeing in the photo of the steering angle sensor? The outer housing doesn't turn, right? All the action is on the inside. The real test here is whether or not your car has had the steering put back together by a butcher. When the steering is centred (and we're not caring about the wheel too much here, we're talking about the front wheels, parallel, facing front) then you should have an absolutely even number of turns from centre to left lock and centre to right lock. If there is any difference at all then perhaps the thing has been put back together wrongly, either the steering wheel put on one spline (or more!) off, and the alignment bodged to straighteb the wheel, or the opposite where something silly was done underneath and the wheel put back on crooked to compensate. Nut there isn't actually much evidence that you have such a problem anyway. It is something you can easily measure and test for to find out though. My money is still on the HICAS CU not driving the PS solenoid with the proper PWM signal required to lighten the load at lower speed. If it were me, I would be putting either a multimeter or oscilloscope onto the solenoid terminals and taking it for a drive, looking for the voltage to change. The PWM signal is 0v, 12V, 0V, 12v with ...obviously...modulated pulse width. You should see that as an average voltage somewhere between 0V and 12V, and it should vary with speed. An handheld oscilloscope would be the better tool for this, because they are definitely good enough but there's no telling if any cheap shit multimeter that people have lying around are good enough. You can also directly interfere with the solenoid. If you wire up a little voltage divider with variable resistor on it, and hook the PS solenoid direct to 12V through that, you can manually adjust the voltage to the solenoid and you should be able to make it go ligheter and heavier. If you cannot, then the problem is either the solenoid itself dead, or your description of the steering being "tight" (which I have just been assuming you mean "heavy") could be that you have a mechanical problem in the steering and there is heaps of resistance to movement.
    • Little update  I have shimmed the solenoid on the rack today following Keep it Reets video on YouTube. However my steering is still tight. I have this showing on Nisscan, my steering angle sensor was the closest to 0 degrees (I could get it to 0 degrees by small little tweaks, but the angle was way off centre? I can't figure this out for the life of me. I get no faults through Nisscan. 
    • The BES920 is like the Toyota Camrys of coffee machines. E61 group head is cool, however the time requirements for home use makes it less desirable. The Toyota Camry coffee machine runs twin boilers and also PID temp control, some say it produces coffees as good as an E61 group head machine.
    • And yes with a full tank it will hit limiter free revving or driving 6B6CDF6E-4094-426D-A9CB-6C553475FE36.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...