Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Since I only buy nissans (or datsuns!) these days, and a skyline's not the car for this job.....

Does anyone know anything about the "March 3HB Super Turbo"? Apparently its a kei car made from 1989 (making it a handy 15 years old).

Has anyone seen an 89 model for sale? Approx price in yen?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46073-march-super-turbo/
Share on other sites

ahh spectacular, I actually wanted an auto but thought they were all manual :P whats the price on the window there?

do you watch a lot of the auctions, I was hoping there might be a few around

It can be in really poor condition as long as the engine and transmission are OK ;)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46073-march-super-turbo/#findComment-936581
Share on other sites

about 200,000yen with 28,000km but this is a H3 dude...

OK Im a simple person, whats the difference between H3 and 3HB or did I just write down the wrong thing?

Thanks for your help with my dreaming :P

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46073-march-super-turbo/#findComment-936600
Share on other sites

its a funny world, Autospeed did a review on one this week :)

--------------------------------------------------------

It seems the ‘hot hatch’ label is applied to any ol’ shopping trolley with slightly more power than usual. But believe us when we tell you this hatch is hot.

The Japanese-market Nissan March Super Turbo – which boasts a supercharger and turbocharger – can easily blast its way to 100 km/h in the high 7 second range. In real world driving, that’s fast enough to keep pace with many high-profile turbocharged guns. No need to be intimidated when you pull up alongside a Galant VR4, Liberty RS or TX3 Turbo!

So how can this humble looking hatch run with the performance giants?

Well, under the bonnet lives Nissan’s fabulous MA09ERT 930cc in-line four. It’s not a particularly sophisticated engine with just a 7.7:1 static compression ratio, SOHC and 8 valves, but its bolt-on forced induction hardware is nothing short of amazing. The March Super Turbo employs one of the few OE supercharger/turbocharger set-ups in the world.

And it works a treat.

At low-to-mid revs, the 930cc four is boosted by a positive displacement blower (see Supercharger Steal - Part One for details). At higher revs, however, a relatively large turbo kicks in to give great top-end performance. Note that the transitional stage is very smooth thanks to a relatively simple supercharger/turbo control system. At low rpm the turbo blows through the supercharger which is effectively ‘free-wheeling’. Then, at high rpm, the supercharger is disengaged by an electro-magnetic clutch and the turbo feeds the engine via a supercharger bypass passage. Airflow through this passage is controlled by a differential pressure valve which begins to open as the turbocharger nears operating speed.

Give it just a whiff of throttle at low rpm and you’ll see the supercharger deliver up to 7 psi of boost. This means wonderful part-throttle performance but, curiously, flooring the throttle at this stage doesn’t necessarily equate to greater acceleration. At more than 4500 rpm, however, the turbocharger steps in and boost pressure swells to 13 psi. That’s when it’s go-go-go!

With 81kW at 6200 rpm and 130Nm at 4800 rpm the March Super Turbo – which weighs just 770kg - is an absolute rocket. Performance varies depending on the temperature of the top-mount air-to-air intercooler, but high 7 second 0 – 100s are easy. Note that, as far as we can determine, the March Super Turbo is available only as a 5-speed manual.

With supercharged torque available at low revs, there’s little chance of bogging down off the line – the only concern is wheelspin caused by too many revs. We discovered the standard 175/65 13 tyres are easy to light up, despite fitment a front LSD.

But one of the biggest downsides of the March Super Turbo is its unrefined chassis.

Underneath, it’s obvious this little flier is built on a budget platform – the primitive beam rear axle is a giveaway. Still, the ride is reasonably comfortable and the chassis doesn’t do anything unexpected when flung through an urban corner – there’s a bit of understeer but that’s it. There is, however, quite a lot of reaction through the steering wheel when accelerating hard on an undulating surface – typical high-power front-wheel-drive stuff. Note that our test car also had worn-out dampers.

The March’s non-assisted steering feels fine when you’re cruising along but it loads up massively at parking speeds and when you fling it around. The difference in weighting is dramatic.

With ventilated discs up front and drums at the rear, braking performance was fine during our test. There is no ABS.

Chassis rigidity wasn’t exactly a forte for hatchbacks in the 1980s – and the Nissan March is no exception. Expect the usual body jiggles, tailgate rattles and creaks. This aside, the cabin is accommodating and comfortable. The March can seat four people with surprisingly good space – sure it’s a bit tight overall, but it’s not an imposition to sit in the back. The Super Turbo also gets flashy sports buckets which are comfortable and supportive.

Standard interior features include power mirrors, a graphic equaliser and air conditioning. There’s a decent array of gauges as well. The main cluster houses an easy-to-read speedo, tacho, fuel level and coolant temp gauge while a central gauge pod contains a clock, voltmeter and boost gauge (marked in millimetres of mercury). The only immediately noticeable absentee is power windows.

Visually, the March Super Turbo is pretty anonymous. Viewed from the rear you could be forgiven for thinking it’s an everyday Pulsar – albeit slightly downscaled and with a rear spoiler. At the front, however, the Super Turbo looks at you with its prominent fog lights and bonnet scoop. Subtle side skirts and wheel arch flares, 13 inch alloy wheels and Super Turbo stickers are the only other remaining eye catchers. Painted black, the March Super Turbo looks tough enough to raise interest – but not enough to deter a potential traffic light challenger!

We really cannot overstate the speed of this little car. To put things into perspective, it’s totally within its capabilities to wipe, say, a Hyundai Excel with an aftermarket turbo kit. Oh, and you can buy an entire Nissan March for the cost of just the Hyundai’s turbo kit!

Available from Adelaide’s Yahoo Motorsport for AUD$4600 (plus ADR-ing), this March Super Turbo is one of the more expensive 15 year old import hatches we’ve tested – but it’s also by far the most serious. Our test vehicle had 113,000km on the clock and, at the time of photography, was in need of some body detailing. Note that the March Super Turbo was released in Japan in 1989 and was axed in 1992.

Unfortunately, finding suitable parts will be a hassle. The EK10-series March was never officially delivered to Australia, which means all body and interior parts are very difficult to source. The same goes for that fantastic supercharged/turbocharged engine – it’s an orphan. We should say, however, the engine and some other design elements look very similar to local Pulsar/EXA models – we wouldn’t be surprised if some parts were interchangeable.

Now let’s veer off the rails for a moment...

If you like the idea of wasting HSVs and WRXs, the March Super Turbo offers plenty of tuning potential. The stock air intake looks quite restrictive, as does the press-bent and heavily muffled exhaust system. Improving intake and exhaust flow could probably give 100-odd kilowatts in total. And what about the top-mount ‘interheater’ and boost pressure? Well, whack a larger ‘cooler in the nosecone and up the turbo boost maybe a couple of psi and you’d have one insanely quick little beast. Fit some grippy front tyres and you’d have a 6 second 0 – 100 km/h machine – guaranteed.

Serious performance is there for the taking!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46073-march-super-turbo/#findComment-948741
Share on other sites

there's plenty of march super turbo's running around in the japanese Kei car championships... and the H3 evolee's talkin about means H3 = 1991, you're lookin for an H1 car which is 1989.

i believe you are after this...

http://www.j-garage.com/nissan/march/2410.htm

How about a nice lil 1989 Nissan Pao Campustoppo :)

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/46073-march-super-turbo/#findComment-948752
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...