Jump to content
SAU Community

Chopper Wheel For Ross Balancer


shnaped_second
 Share

Recommended Posts

If you get something made up, remember it needs to have the missing teeth for reference, I have 280-290 missing from memory

Mine is a 36 - 2 wheel, also you need to make sure that the wheel is balanced and not too thick as it will foul on the front timing cover

I used 6mm but I put mine on an ATI balancer but measure your own

Are you using a Ross trigger kit? Ensure the wheel runs directly over the sensors, around 2 mm spacing mine is from memory.. Too close or too far and it will not work properly.

It's a big job man

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you get something made up, remember it needs to have the missing teeth for reference, I have 280-290 missing from memory

Mine is a 36 - 2 wheel, also you need to make sure that the wheel is balanced and not too thick as it will foul on the front timing cover

I used 6mm but I put mine on an ATI balancer but measure your own

Are you using a Ross trigger kit? Ensure the wheel runs directly over the sensors, around 2 mm spacing mine is from memory.. Too close or too far and it will not work properly.

It's a big job man

Im running a platinum pro so i can only run 24 + 1, using a murrayis kit and the cam side is already fitted with 1gt101 just need to remove the balancer and fit a wheel, the ross wheel doesn't have a missing tooth And lots of kits people have made or used dont have them missing either... not to sure if there is any problem with that?

post-7636-0-23717300-1446498758_thumb.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I dunno man, my tuner said that's how it needed to be made for me link G4 so that's how I made it. My old Ross had a couple of missing teeth but no it doesn't necessarily need to have teeth missing

I can only assume that those setups would get engine position from the CAS at start up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For sure, bromance with common shit box interests.
    • People like Johnny Dose Bro might be laughing at my post because I accidentally added 100mm to my numbers. 350-355 is indeed the lower limit. 450 is off-road Skyline spec.
    • What is the "compromise" that you think will happen? Are you thinking that something will get damaged? The only things you have to be concerned about with spherical jointed suspension arms are; Arguments with the constabulary wrt their legality (they are likely to be illegal for road use without an engineering certificatation, and that may not be possible to obtain). A lot more NVH transmitted through to the passengers (which is hardly a concern for those with a preference for good handling, anyway). Greatly increased inspection and maintenance requirements (see above points, both).   It is extremely necessary to ask what car you are talking about. Your discussion on strut tops, for example, would be completely wrong for an R chassis, but be correct for an S chassis. R32s have specific problems that R33/4 do not have. Etc. I have hardened rubber bushes on upper rear control arms and traction rods. Adjustable length so as to be able to set both camber and bump steer. You cannot contemplate doing just the control arms and not the traction arms. And whatever bushing you have in one you should have in the other so that they have similar characteristics. Otherwise you can get increased oddness of behaviour as one bushing flexes and the other doesn't, changing the alignment between them. I have stock lower rear arms with urethane bushes. I may make changes here, these are are driven by the R32's geometry problems, so I won't discuss them here unless it proves necessary. I have spherical joints in the front caster rods. I have experienced absolutely no negatives and only positives from doing so. They are massively better than any other option. I have sphericals in the FUCAs, but this is driven largely by the (again) R32 specific problems with the motion of those arms. I just have to deal with the increased maintenance required. Given how much better the front end behaves with the sphericals in there.....I'd probably be tempted to go away from my preference (which is not to have sphericals on a road car, for 2 of the 3 reasons in the bulleted list above), just to gain those improvements. And so my preference for not using sphericals (in general) on a road car should be obvious. I use them judiciously, though, as required to solve particular problems.
    • Aren't we already on one? SAU unforgettable bromance.
    • Easiest way to know is to break out the multimeter and measure it when cold, then measure all the resistances again once it gets hot enough to misfire. Both the original ignitor and the J Replace version. Factory service manual will have the spec for the terminal measurements.
×
×
  • Create New...