Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I can't see it mattering what orientation you mount them. Forwards, backwards, upside down, inside out. Face it....99% of them are just a pipe. Bent back and forth with fins on the outside, but just a pipe. Push oil in one end and it will come out the other, along with any bubbles that were in there or are contained in the incoming flow. There is no reason to worry about bleeding, filling, or any other bullshit. There's no reason to consider whether heat rises or falls or twists itself in knots.

Yes that's true for the tube type ones but the better quality such as Setrab or Mocal are built like a radiator and should be mounted with the inlet and outlet facing up or on its side with inlet at the bottom and outlet at the top. If this type is mounted upside down air can be trapped at the top reducing efficiency.

  • Like 1

Would it also depend on what part of the system you are adding a cooler to? How strong the pump is pushing will determine whether the cooler is filled quick enough, or only a few rows filled say if you had the in and out upside down.

I've tried to find info on the skyline auto trans, steering etc pumps with no luck.

Would it also depend on what part of the system you are adding a cooler to? How strong the pump is pushing will determine whether the cooler is filled quick enough, or only a few rows filled say if you had the in and out upside down.

I've tried to find info on the skyline auto trans, steering etc pumps with no luck.

SK has a piece on upgrading the stock trans cooler with a bigger (also pipe type) cooler:

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/59399-transmission-cooler/

SK has a piece on upgrading the stock trans cooler with a bigger (also pipe type) cooler:

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/59399-transmission-cooler/

thanks bob, mine is setup in basically the same way, but a bit higher. :) My thinking was that such a large cooler is almost useless as the oil only runs down the bottom of the cooler.

I was more interested in orientation of coolers for different parts, like steering, diff, engine etc. as i couldn't find any info on flow rates of the oil.

IMG_4164.jpg

IMG_4162.jpg

Mounted mine sideways as that was the best way to have it for my particular setup over in the passenger side front bar region. Not a fan of squeezing a cooler in infront of the radiator, plus my P/S and aircon stuff is already there.

My R34 GTT OEM auto trans cooler was vertical (middle of the pic):

9741259392_0b90ae22fa.jpg

I installed a Davies Craig core the same way:
9871850506_48e9a33e89_z.jpg

The car is now manual and I've just replaced the Davies Craig with a Mocal oil cooler core, again vertical (on the right):

24060434862_2227508f3f.jpg

^^^ I've also reused the original trans cooler as a PS cooler, it's now horizontal.

...

Like GTSBoy said, the orientation probably doesn't matter as long as you get some decent air flow through the core...

You'd have some of the most chilled out power steering out there.
May i ask, what was the reason you decided to move the trans/PS cooler, and put the oil in its place?
Id have thought oil on the side would be better, as it would be a lot hotter than the trans that it replaced and would get cleaner airflow and not heat up the radiator?

Maybe i'm overthinking it.

You'd have some of the most chilled out power steering out there.

May i ask, what was the reason you decided to move the trans/PS cooler, and put the oil in its place?

Id have thought oil on the side would be better, as it would be a lot hotter than the trans that it replaced and would get cleaner airflow and not heat up the radiator?

Maybe i'm overthinking it.

Haha maybe - I got a bit carried away with the PS cooling after reading this: http://www.trak-life.com/diy-power-steering-oil-cooler/

Re previous auto trans cooler (Davies Craig), it's been disconnected since the manual conversion. I just modified the original auto trans cooler bracket and used the same space for the new oil cooler for a sturdy mount.

From a heat perspective you're right, it would have made more sense running the oil cooler in the guard. However the oil cooler is significantly bigger than the original auto trans core so would have been a tight squeeze. The braided hoses are difficult too because you can't do small radius turns, probably would have needed to have inlet and outlet facing down which is not ideal.

Anyway here's the Trak-Life inspiration for the oil cooler install: http://www.trak-life.com/diy-r33-skyline-oil-cooler-with-thermostat/

This borrowed pic gives a idea of the core size:

DIY-Oil-Cooler-03.jpg

I have no arisen etcI run both cooler cores (Oil and power Steering) the same as above ^^^ (outlets both facing headlights though) I have no air con or anything up front though.

I was taught to use them like that years ago, and Ive always done it since. Never had any issues doing it like so either. ;)

Edited by R31 drift pig

Found this on gtr.co.uk: http://www.gtr.co.uk/forum/56507-aftermarket-oil-cooler-location-poll.html

post-45640-0-93588000-1452199264_thumb.png

Looks like there is a pretty even mix of install locations for oil coolers.

On the R34 the washer bottle takes up a fair bit of spare in the RH guard and if you have a return flow cooler the piping will be in the LH guard, so those can limit your options.

post-45640-0-93588000-1452199264_thumb.png

Orientation doesn't mean a lot, prob more important is airflow, I've got both my powersteer cooler and engine oil cooler between the intercooler and radiator (large Ron Davis Rad) where in a perfect world they wouldn't be jammed in there......but all my temps even on the track equalise at very well.

OilCoolers-1.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I saw you mention this earlier and it raised a red flag, but I couldn't believe it was real. Yes, the vacuum signal should vary. It is the one and only load signal from the engine to the ECU, and it MUST vary. It is either not connected or is badly f**ked up in some way.
    • @Haggerty you still haven't answered my question.  Many things you are saying do not make sense for someone who can tune, yet I would not expect someone who cannot tune to be playing with the things in the ECU that you are.  This process would be a lot quicker to figure out if we can remove user error from the equation. 
    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
×
×
  • Create New...