Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys

I will be fitting an HTA3076 to my R34 (already bought the turbo based on previous advice on here). Basically I have the following current set up

R34 RB25 neo stock internals

garrett GT3076r .63 housing

tuneagent cheap manifold

external gate

1000cc id injectors

tomei type b 260 cams

big fuel pump, surge tank, exhaust, front mount etc

power fc running caltex e flex all the time making 320 rwkw.

The car currently runs 22 psi but drops down to 16 psi at the top end. Dyno sheet attached.

To give some background, I asked a few questions in this thread:

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426059-forced-performance-hta-turbos/page-15

The car was dropping down to 16 psi and even with the .63 housing was laggier than other people running a larger rear housing, but I decided to leave the car as it was until now. The turbo now appears to have shit itself so I am now replacing it. I thought hard about whether I should just put the HTA on the manifold I have now but given the boost control issue and the lag I think I would be better off changing the manifold, gate, turbo, housing and putting on a quality setup.

The question is what rear housing to go. I see a lot of talk of twin scroll for GT35 size turbos but not so much for for this HTA3076. What do people think of the following:

http://gcg.com.au/turbo-parts/turbine-housings/garrett-gt30r-series-1/turbine-housing-gt30r-t3-split-pulse-detail

http://gcg.com.au/turbo-parts/turbine-housings/garrett-gt30r-series-1/turbine-housing-gt30r-v-band-in-out-split-pulse-detail

Obviously if I went the divided housing I would get a proper manifold with either single or twin gates made up to suit. Looking to run 22-24 psi (stock internals). Unsure exactly what springs to order here. Around the desired PSI I want to run?

I was curious as to what size housing would be best and emailed GCG and they said:

In a similar ratio single entry vs dual entry comparison, power levels will be almost identical, however spool rates can be improved u to 800rpm depending on the application. If a proper manifold is made to suit split pulse, the advantages are very noticeable. Our most common 2.5L size would be either 0.82a/r or 0.83a/r. We haven’t used that many 1.01a/r split pulse turbos in this application, so we don’t really have any numbers between 0.82 S/E vs 1.01 D/E. Either way, anything in the 0.8** range is ideal for this engine.

Basically I am leaning towards going for the .83 twin scroll housing based on GCG's reply above, stating that power levels will be almost identical but will spool quicker. I drive the car on the street and would like less lag than what I have now. If I can also get more top end that is a bonus but I would really like to get some quick spool happening.

However I have read other people say that when you go twin scroll you go up a housing size as they restrict the top end.

So I just thought I would post this up as I know there are some very knowledgeable people on these boards. What are peoples thoughts on these rear housings?

Thanks

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/463143-what-rear-housing-for-hta3076/
Share on other sites

The car was dropping down to 16 psi and even with the .63 housing was laggier than other people running a larger rear housing...

... I think I would be better off changing the manifold, gate, turbo, housing and putting on a quality setup.

Basically I am leaning towards going for the .83 twin scroll housing based on GCG's reply above, stating that power levels will be almost identical but will spool quicker. I drive the car on the street and would like less lag than what I have now. If I can also get more top end that is a bonus but I would really like to get some quick spool happening.

Can't see your dyno sheet, bear in mind it only demonstrates what happens under full load. Not the real world transient response. I drove Mafia's 3076 0.63 setup, and reckon for road use that turbo with either water injection or E85 it's great on a RB25. Comes in earlier, also signs out earlier. But gives easy access to big streetable hp. Not ideal for track, IMO though.

Street use only, run with the 0.82 split pulse. But you must be prepared to get a well designed manifold with twin gates. That's going to cost, but it will get the best result. Wolverine's 3082 0.82 split pulse setup was extremely smooth and progressive. Don't recall that it rolled over up top, seemed pretty good. If you're running E85 it should be sensational.

A single scroll 0.82 would be far simpler to get a decent manifold and gate setup. Less complexity, less cost. Easier to install and maintain stuff. Again on E85, you're way ahead. Still, have to expect it will take around 4000-4200 to make 22psi, but it would run hard to 7500, maybe more given you have non standard cams.

You are probably going to find the 1.0x GT30 housings (in either single entry or split pulse) much less easy to get onto - do you know what their actual availability is? The thing I have noticed when playing with a 1.06 split pulse housing was that they are bulky and really make access to the oil & water lines on the centre cartridge very difficult. That alone would be enough to make me look elsewhere.

For best results, you can't beat cubic inches. Get a RB30 bottom end under that head. Run with the simpler/cheaper single scroll 0.82 and E85.

  • Like 1
  • 6 months later...
On 22 February 2016 at 9:44 PM, vkadam said:

Hi guys

I will be fitting an HTA3076 to my R34 (already bought the turbo based on previous advice on here). Basically I have the following current set up

R34 RB25 neo stock internals

garrett GT3076r .63 housing

tuneagent cheap manifold

external gate

1000cc id injectors

tomei type b 260 cams

big fuel pump, surge tank, exhaust, front mount etc

power fc running caltex e flex all the time making 320 rwkw.

The car currently runs 22 psi but drops down to 16 psi at the top end. Dyno sheet attached.

To give some background, I asked a few questions in this thread:

http://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426059-forced-performance-hta-turbos/page-15

The car was dropping down to 16 psi and even with the .63 housing was laggier than other people running a larger rear housing, but I decided to leave the car as it was until now. The turbo now appears to have shit itself so I am now replacing it. I thought hard about whether I should just put the HTA on the manifold I have now but given the boost control issue and the lag I think I would be better off changing the manifold, gate, turbo, housing and putting on a quality setup.

The question is what rear housing to go. I see a lot of talk of twin scroll for GT35 size turbos but not so much for for this HTA3076. What do people think of the following:

http://gcg.com.au/turbo-parts/turbine-housings/garrett-gt30r-series-1/turbine-housing-gt30r-t3-split-pulse-detail

http://gcg.com.au/turbo-parts/turbine-housings/garrett-gt30r-series-1/turbine-housing-gt30r-v-band-in-out-split-pulse-detail

Obviously if I went the divided housing I would get a proper manifold with either single or twin gates made up to suit. Looking to run 22-24 psi (stock internals). Unsure exactly what springs to order here. Around the desired PSI I want to run?

I was curious as to what size housing would be best and emailed GCG and they said:

In a similar ratio single entry vs dual entry comparison, power levels will be almost identical, however spool rates can be improved u to 800rpm depending on the application. If a proper manifold is made to suit split pulse, the advantages are very noticeable. Our most common 2.5L size would be either 0.82a/r or 0.83a/r. We haven’t used that many 1.01a/r split pulse turbos in this application, so we don’t really have any numbers between 0.82 S/E vs 1.01 D/E. Either way, anything in the 0.8** range is ideal for this engine.

Basically I am leaning towards going for the .83 twin scroll housing based on GCG's reply above, stating that power levels will be almost identical but will spool quicker. I drive the car on the street and would like less lag than what I have now. If I can also get more top end that is a bonus but I would really like to get some quick spool happening.

However I have read other people say that when you go twin scroll you go up a housing size as they restrict the top end.

So I just thought I would post this up as I know there are some very knowledgeable people on these boards. What are peoples thoughts on these rear housings?

Thanks

Hey man I'm also looking at doing the .83 twin scroll rear on a hta3076 but on a s1 rb25 with pon cams on e85... 

Did you end up going down this route? What result did you see??

Fwiw I also went from a gt3076 to HTA 3076 on my 34 gtt, it isn't done yet but as with you i also went with the Poncams and water/meth (no e85) I was fully prepared to go the twin scroll route but after much reading it seemed the concensus was 'it's not worth it for a turbo this size that's already responsive' so I got a top Mount 6 boost manifold and single scroll rear, .82 I think?

Fwiw I also went from a gt3076 to HTA 3076 on my 34 gtt, it isn't done yet but as with you i also went with the Poncams and water/meth (no e85) I was fully prepared to go the twin scroll route but after much reading it seemed the concensus was 'it's not worth it for a turbo this size that's already responsive' so I got a top Mount 6 boost manifold and single scroll rear, .82 I think?




Yeah man I pmed you last week about yours... Have a look in your inbox brother

Hey sorry for the late reply. I did end up purchasing the twin scroll housing and getting a workshop to fit it all up and tune it. The car will not hold boost and drops back to 16psi at redline for some reason (down from 22 psi, it did the same thing with my old 3076). However it still makes 353 rwkw at that 16 psi. It is a totally different car to drive. At the same rpm where it used to make under 200rwkw it now makes almost 300 rwkw. Compared to what I had before (garrett 3076 .63 with a tuneagent manifold) it now almost feels like going back to a car with the stock turbo down low.

Edited by vkadam
  • Like 1

here is the new sheet. At 115 klms per hour it makes about 290 rwkw. So it made a pretty big difference.

Also the torque is way up. At 95 klms on the old turbo it made 150nm whereas with the new turbo it makes 300nm at 95klms.

new dyno.jpg

Edited by vkadam
here is the new sheet. At 115 klms per hour it makes about 290 rwkw. So it made a pretty big difference.

Also the torque is way up. At 95 klms on the old turbo it made 150nm whereas with the new turbo it makes 300nm at 95klms.

new dyno.jpg

Thanks for your reply man [emoji4]

What size a/r twin scroll rear housing did you end up using? And what manifold did you mate it with?

What boost control are you running and what size gate?

Sorry for 20 questions brother hahah

+1 actually following up with results
 

.63 rears just are kind of shit in the real world, you nearly never get a better result or a more responsive result from going that way. See also: Cheap manifolds. Use the stocker (its really not that bad) or go full retard and twin scroll high mount things.

16 hours ago, vkadam said:

I did end up purchasing the twin scroll housing and getting a workshop to fit it all up and tune it. The car will not hold boost and drops back to 16psi at redline for some reason (down from 22 psi, it did the same thing with my old 3076). However it still makes 353 rwkw at that 16 psi.

It is a totally different car to drive.... it now almost feels like going back to a car with the stock turbo down low.

Great news, great result.  Got pics of the install?  As per PWRLaurel, interested to see more about the manifold (and gate/s) setup.

 

Could be FMIC related as the pressure is dropping dramatically across the core.. so hot side could still be 22psi however cold side is 16psi (as an example).

Try hooking up the pressure source from the cold side to your actuator and block off the pressure source (compressor side).

And "if" it's hitting 22psi all the way, then you know your FMIC is playing silly buggers.

Could be FMIC related as the pressure is dropping dramatically across the core.. so hot side could still be 22psi however cold side is 16psi (as an example).

Try hooking up the pressure source from the cold side to your actuator and block off the pressure source (compressor side).

And "if" it's hitting 22psi all the way, then you know your FMIC is playing silly buggers.



Another plausible possibility for sure... I run my turbosmart eboost2 boost gauge source from the plenum and I have a separate Omori Boost gauge source from the compressor housing and there is a very slight (less then a full second) delay in me reaching my target boost at the plenum and the compressor spikes to 1psi higher at the same time.

Correct me if I'm wrong but could another possibility be faulty/weak bov?

^^ Consider boost leaks from any/everywhere.

I'd also think about the air intake pipe, filter, intercooler piping, intercooler, and every part of the exhaust system.

Some flow-restrictive areas aren't immediately obvious until after they're changed, and the hp output increases like magic.

I wouldn't consider it "that" easy to push a setup like VKAdam has up near the 400kW mark without a few challenges.  But what he's got now is pretty impressive!

 

^^ Consider boost leaks from any/everywhere.

I'd also think about the air intake pipe, filter, intercooler piping, intercooler, and every part of the exhaust system.

Some flow-restrictive areas aren't immediately obvious until after they're changed, and the hp output increases like magic.

I wouldn't consider it "that" easy to push a setup like VKAdam has up near the 400kW mark without a few challenges.  But what he's got now is pretty impressive!

 

For sure man! Its a great result especially compared to the old gt3076...

As far as boost leaks go,

I spray soapy water all around the bay and use compressed air (30-35psi) through a 2-1/2 inch tapered pvc tap and pressurise my whole system to eliminate boost leaks! Works a treat and I very rarely have any leaks cos I do the test a few times a year or whenever I'm doing an intercooler flush or turbo inspection or swap etc...

I would suggest vkadam does something similar to rule that out also..

Went with the .83 twin scroll

The manifold was sinco and used two turbosmart 40mm comp gates. The workshop also put in a Nitto Head gasket, ARP head studs and Performance valve springs.  Also put 1600cc injectors in and retuned. For some reason my 1000ccs were at a pretty high duty cycle at only 320 rwkw.

DaleFZ1 - Thanks for your advice in this thread, appreciate it. I do not have pics, however if you are interested I could take some.

Laurelpower and dosepipe sutututu- yea I will try and find where the boost leak is occurring. If it ran 22 or 24 psi to redline it would have to be getting close to 400kw, so that would be good. However at the moment I can't really put that power to the ground effectively.

 

Plans for the car are:

- get boost leak fixed

- flare rear guards

- alignment to reduce negative camber in rear

- new wider and grippier rear tyres

 

Car currently has 18x10 +15 on the rear with stock guards not even rolled and there is very little clearance. It currently has ksport coilovers that came with the car and are relatively hard. It does look to have some negative camber which means it never scrubs. I am hoping if I roll and flare the rear guards I can run less negative camber without scrubbing and get much better traction without spending too much more money. Traction at the moment is really lacking.

I too have had struggles with traction so I added some micro flares, some 315/30/18 nitto nt01 semi slicks and re aligned the car to only .8° camber on both rears. I can't recommend the nt01 enough. Excellent grip even without a warm up. I also run my rear coilovers and sway bar on the softest settings.

As far as your turbo/engine set up is concerned, have you read the thread about a hta3076 by 34GeeTeeTee on his rb25 Neo ?
His engine set up is very similar to yours except single scroll not twin scroll but (absolutely no offence intended) his results are far more impressive than yours... Here's his dyno for before and after the turbo swap e2beec2c9ea4423b64eea4edca8d7874.jpg

Blue line is gt3076 and red line is hta3076



Here the link to the thread: Forced Performance Hta Turbos


There must be a restriction or boost leak somewhere in your system bro...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Place the new daughterboard in the case and mount it using the 3 small black rivets provided, and reconnect the 3 factory ribbon cables to the new board Then, use the 3 piggyback cables from the daughterboard into the factory board on top (there are stand offs in the case to keep them apart. and remember to reconnect the antenna and rear cover fan wires. 1 screw to hold the motherboard in place. Before closing the case, make a hole in the sticker covering a hole in the case and run the cable for the android unit into the plug there. The video forgot this step, so did I, so will you probably. Then redo the 4 screws on back, 2 each top and bottom, 3 each side and put the 2 brackets back on.....all ready to go and not that tricky really.      
    • Onto the android unit. You need to remove the top screen because there is a daughterboard to put inside the case. Each side vent pops out from clips; start at the bottom and carefully remove upwards (use a trim remover tool to avoid breaking anything). Then the lower screen and controls come out, 4 screws, a couple of clips (including 3 flimsy ones at the top) and 3 plugs on the rear. Then the upper screen, 4 screws and a bunch of plugs and she is out. From there, remove the mounting brackets (2 screws each), 4 screws on the rear, 2 screws top and bottom and 3 screws holding in the small plates on each side. When you remove the back cover (tight fit), watch out for the power cable for the fan, I removed it so I could put the back aside. The mainboard is held in by 1 screw in the middle, 1 aerial at the top and 3 ribbon cables. If you've ever done any laptop stuff the ribbon cables are OK to work with, just pop up the retainer and they slide out. If you are not familiar just grab a 12 year old from an iphone factory, they will know how it works The case should now look like this:
    • Switching the console was tricky. First there were 6 screws to remove, and also the little adapter loom and its screws had to come out. Also don't forget to remove the 2 screws holding the central locking receiver. Then there are 4 clips on either side....these were very tight in this case and needed careful persuading with a long flat screw driver....some force required but not enough to break them...this was probably the fiddliest part of the whole job. In my case I needed both the wiring loom and the central locking receiver module to swap across to the new one. That was it for the console, so "assembly is the reverse of disassembly"
    • But first....while I was there, I also swapped across the centre console box for the other style where the AV inputs don't intrude into the (very limited !) space.  Part# was 96926-4GA0A, 284H3-4GA0B, 284H3-4GA0A. (I've already swapped the top 12v socket for a USB bulkhead in this pic, it fit the hole without modification:) Comparison of the 2: Basically to do the console you need to remove the DS and PS side console trim (they slide up and back, held in by clips only) Then remove the back half of the console top trim with the cupholders, pops up, all clips again but be careful at the front as it is pretty flimsy. Then slide the shifter boot down, remove the spring clip, loose it forever somewhere in the car the pull the shift knob off. Remove the tiny plastic piece on DS near "P" and use something thin and long (most screwdrivers won't fit) to push down the interlock and put the shifter down in D for space. There is one screw at the front, then the shifter surround and ashtray lift up. There are 3 or 4 plugs underneath and it is off. Next is the rear cover of the centre console; you need to open the console lid, pop off the trim covering the lid hinge and undo the 2rd screw from the driver's side (the rest all need to come out later so you can do them all now and remove the lid) Then the rear cover unclips (6 clips), start at the top with a trim tool pulling backwards. Once it is off there are 2 screws facing rearwards to remove (need a short phillips for these) and you are done with the rear of the console. There are 4 plugs at the A/V box to unclip Then there are 2 screws at the front of the console, and 2 clips (pull up and back) and the console will come out.
    • So, a bit of a side trip, but one that might be interesting for people with JDM cars and japanese head units. I know @Pac previously posted about a carplay/android auto adapter he installed which used the AUX input, and @V35_Paul put in one of the Tesla style units that replace both screens. The option I went with was a Lsait LLT-YF-VER5.87_2 (https://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/Lsailt-8GB-Android-Multimedia-Interface-for_1601187633672.html). Price was $1,150 for a single unit although they are much cheaper if you are willing to buy 2....$857ea. Make you you get the version 2 not version 1, it is faster and has a better UI - this is the manufacturer listing: http://www.lsailt.com/product/348.html. BTW if you've never bought from Alibaba before, don't be concerned....these guys can't stay in business unless they are responsive, ship fast etc, they were excellent (probably faster shipping than most local places) So, this was my task for a lazy Sat afternoon....looks complex but was all done in a few hours (it probably helps that I had some of it apart before so it was a bit familiar). I also decided to add a HD USB drive recorded at the same time and the unit also supports an aftermarket reverse cam (if you don't want to retain factory) and also AV in and HDMI out It looks much worse than it is, in fact in was genuinely all plug and play (no custom wiring at all). This video was pretty good (skipped a few steps), unfortunately they are an Aussie seller but no longer sell this unit (I guess Carplay/AA adapters are easier to install and much cheaper) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T5hJfYOB8Dg
×
×
  • Create New...