Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I had no cat on my Legalis R when I bought the car.

Fitted a 100 cell cat, couldn't notice any loss in power at all (under 5000 rpm )

Also the cat didn't make it any quieter really. Maybe 3-5 dB

Just want it to be legal, plus bonus bung for tuning.

Still over 110 dB.

Over 110db is illegal, right? Whatever you have cat or not. But de-cat is another reason for defect

I know you've already bought your exhaust but the Legalis is the best sounding exhaust for the m35

Purely sexual I tell ya !!

It does flow cause I managed 317kw with a decat front pipe

Very quiet no drone inside the cabin

But loud when you get on it

Yes there is a difference as with the 42.7mm you are actually restricting the flow where as the 60.5 mm silencer (SIS090) is actually the same internal size as the exhaust internal so no flow is restricted. You will need to cut a small amount from the end to allow to fit. I will try and find a pic for you to show

  • Like 1

You need to cut of 32mm of the inner pipe to fit flush. Are you on face book ill tag you in my post.

ordered SIS090 today with special sound absorbing cotton ring to reduce the drony.

post-137368-0-10270200-1459237534_thumb.jpg

post-137368-0-82014800-1459237534_thumb.gif

post-137368-0-71093600-1459237537_thumb.jpg

NIS001 is 135mm length, SIS090 is 220mm. i would like to cut 85mm on SIS090, this could make the exhaust air go into the small room then out to atm, like a smaller muffler.

post-137368-0-03705800-1459238142.jpg

Edited by YangLIU

Yeah i dont understand the need for the cotton donut....

The silencer works as the exhaust gasses now exit further towards the rear of the muffler thus less space for noise?

Wow. That cotton ring will do shit all. As will your small gap plan

I'm betting on it. 5 bucks. Cash.

here is a video for that cotton ring. not sure if it is sure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 馃槩 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
  • Create New...